I am usually sad?

Tangy, you have really gone off the deep end. Must be your white privilege.

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/5/2018 11:22:00 AM (view original):
I am usually sad?

Tangy, you have really gone off the deep end. Must be your white privilege.

Sad in a different way, usually.


You are right. I am deeply privileged to be white in this country. You are too.

I am? Do tell.

1. You whine about Trump
2. You have white guilt
3. You say you are both Jewish and Christian...whatever works to fit your narrative
4. You are uneducated
5. You are a terrible writer
6. You stalk me on the MLB forum

I think you need to reconsider which of us is "sad"?

I am more angry about the SB than sad because the defensive game plan was crap. But the Pats are the favorites to win it in 2019 already. Great team and a great run of 18 years. Cannot be sad about that. The Bruins are very good, the Celtics are awesome and young, the Red Sox are annual contenders. I am not sure what I need to be sad about? Would you please explain it to me?

Thank you

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/5/2018 11:31:00 AM (view original):
I am? Do tell.

1. You whine about Trump
2. You have white guilt
3. You say you are both Jewish and Christian...whatever works to fit your narrative
4. You are uneducated
5. You are a terrible writer
6. You stalk me on the MLB forum

I think you need to reconsider which of us is "sad"?

I am more angry about the SB than sad because the defensive game plan was crap. But the Pats are the favorites to win it in 2019 already. Great team and a great run of 18 years. Cannot be sad about that. The Bruins are very good, the Celtics are awesome and young, the Red Sox are annual contenders. I am not sure what I need to be sad about? Would you please explain it to me?

Thank you

1. I would not say 'whine'
2. I do not.
3. I am.
4. No I am not.
5. Subjective :)
6. I don't stalk anyone. I posted on that forum to give my two cents.

Good answer.

#1) What would you call it? I've been on these boards for 15 years? I didn't complain about BHO the way you do about DJT.
#2) I think you do. Opinions vary.
#3) How convenient. Are you a Buddhist as well?
#4) Yes, you are. Terrible writer and you admitted you are not well versed in the economy.
#5) Yes
#6) Regarding my post. There were 100 other posts. You chose mine. Stalker.

1) I rant :)
2) I am the only one who knows MY opinions. I do not.
3) You are Jewish and atheist. I am Christian and Jewish. We are Jewish in the same way. Stop arguing just to argue.
4) Funny. I don't write about the economy. I am a sportswriter. Please stay out of my job. And I don't argue just to argue. I am not knowledgable about the economy so I don't argue about it.
6) I quoted sjpokers post. Not yours. I said you were an idiot. You look way too far into this.

"C) The Page warrant was renewed at least three times and each renewal must be presented with new information. Law enforcement can’t use the same case to justify the renewal. The investigation must have been fruitful for a renewal."

THIS!

Each time the FISA application on Page was sought (multiple times, multiple Judges) the Gov't would have had to demonstrate to the Judge that the FISA was producing by disclosing to the Judge evidence sufficient to convince the Judge that probable cause was on-going and that Page "appeared" to be serving as a "foreign operative".

The idea that the FBI (or anybody) could have orchestrated a "plot" of the nature being inferred by Trump's defender's (Nunes, etc) is 0%, according to the guy who headed the FISA application process for George W. Bush!. It is nothing but a baseless conspiracy theory.

As to (pinhead) Rep. Gowdy. HE is the ONLY Republican that has actually viewed the complete file of info that the Nunes Memo is based on. HE relayed (to Nunes) what he claimed to have seen within the file. The Dem. that viewed it says the Nunes spin is inaccurate. Following the publication of the Nunes memo (based on Gowdy's account of the full file!) Mr. Gowdy announced he was NOT seeking re-election next year.

Interesting timeline IMO. Is Gowdy a liar??? My response is HE's a politician! Of course he is!!
Is he a bigger liar than Nunes??? Or Ryan?? or Pence??? Probably about equal.
NONE of them can compare to the supreme........... our DON, our WHINER........ Our Liar-In-Chief............. The ASSMAN cometh Donald J. Dump!

I am more interested in why Matt Particia didn't blitz Foles?!?!?

Politics is fun to get a rise out of the Left but that Pats game really hurt. I don't care about politics. I care about my Pats! :(

I feel for ya Boris.......... Well, sorta. You Pats fans have been VERY spoiled!

You raise a much better football point than you do political ones for sure!!! hahaha WHY DIDN'T the Pats blitz more??

Possible answer...........? Foles was seeing the field real well, and the few times the pats did Blitz he threw to exactly the right spot!
Anyways......... as us U of A fans remember well, when Foles gets rolling He's very good. He has way more athletic ability than it seems.
Didn't seem fazed by the big stage at all! Missed less passes than did Brady (who missed a few targets!)

All in all though IF you like offensive wide open football, THIS was the Best Super Bowl ever!! Hands Down.

I would have kept blitzing. I think Philly punted one time?

best game ever. I need a new liver.

I was at the Cs game before that. Great vibes. All went to hell. Bleh.

Pats already the 2019 faves in Vegas. Crazy!

They were probably the favorites last year. Look how that turned out.

yeah, this kinda felt like a swan song for them.

Posted by tangplay on 2/5/2018 4:34:00 PM (view original):
They were probably the favorites last year. Look how that turned out.

They made the SB with a chance to win? I think every team would take that every season. Its not like they finished 5-11. Your posts are dumb.