LEAVE MY ELEVATOR ALONE Topic

Well, that should put the Stormy Daniels matter to rest for good. Nothing to see here if Trump's lawyer paid the money out of his own pocket. Presumably so that she'd shut up about an affair that never happened. Or something. Anyway, it's settled now. Let's move on.
2/13/2018 10:57 PM
LOL...good stuff.
2/13/2018 11:14 PM
By the way, regarding that Obama portrait that's making some conservatives so angry. Obama should have gone full troll for that. Worn his tan suit, and in one hand held a Koran, and in the other a jar of Dijon mustard. That would've freaked out Hannity so much he wouldn't have even noticed all the "secret sperm" in the painting.
2/14/2018 1:14 AM
2/14/2018 10:50 AM
2/14/2018 11:22 AM
Observations from the desert............ after a bit of a lapse in bothering with commentary................

1. For a guy who claimed he knew more "...than the Generals" Trump has sure surrounded himself with military folks.
2. The increase in the deficit/debt should be no surprise from a guy who declared himself "...the king of debt".
3. Now we know why General Kelly was willing to take the Chief of Staff job for Trump.
a. He has revealed himself to be just as big of a liar, and just as big of a power-mad tyrant as his boss. Kinda scary considering who he is and his former role within the military.
b. From a cynical angle, it could be viewed as IF we've actually had a "coup" take place. Considering WHY Kelly was willing to assume the post. Certainly it isn't because of respect for someone he obviously views as a "chump/moron". Could it be because he viewed the position as a way to ACTUALLY be the secret head of Gov't........ with military backing and the ignorance/complicity of Congress and the complete delusion of the elected fool?
4. Our POTUS sure seems to have a slanted view of "due process". Seems it only applies to folks who ostensibly support HIM.
5. It is now apparent that this POTUS will break ANY law, bend ANY rule, obfuscate and deny ANY truth in his desire to rule, screw the masses of middle class and poor, and fool the bleating ignorant sheep and deny-Er's who REFUSE to accept that they made a horrible misjudgment with their willingness to look the other way and elect an unqualified tyrant because of their fears and hatred of an (admittedly) scary strong female with too many suspect connections and too much baggage. I don't blame them for their mistaken judgment, I blame the Democratic party for refusing to face the obvious FACT about their candidate. However, I am beginning to blame the deniers, and apologists who CONTINUE to deny the obvious as time (and MORE damning) facts become all too apparent.
6. DRAIN the SWAMP! Start at the top!. With the head Two. (Chump and Dense) Or Three.(Chump, Dense, and Ryan) or the head 5 or 6 for all I care (Chump, Dense, Ryan, McConnell, Schumer, etc!)
7. The Republican party is in REAL danger of being seen as the Anti- Party FOREVER.
a. Anti-Female
b. Anti-Colored's
c. Anti-Middle Class
d. Anti-Poor (Welfare Mother's!)
e. Anti-Immigration (Many agree with this!)
f. Anti-Science and Information.
g. Anti-College and Education
h. Anti-Environment
i. Anti-Truth
j. Anti-Human dignity

You think that's the way to success politically in this Country in the 21st Century?
I wouldn't bet a plug nickel on that idea!
2/14/2018 11:47 AM
I care about:

#1) Economy: is DJT a business friendly POTUS? --- YES
#2) Military: Is DJT a military supportive POTUS (spend more) --- YES
#3) Israel: Does DJT support Israel or support giving money to their enemies such as Iran and the Palestine state. --- Israel

He checks my three primary boxes. The rest is noise.
2/14/2018 11:56 AM
Boris. In direct response.

1. He is BIG business friendly sure. Is he a business friendly Pres. overall? We don't know. Time will tell. Some say what he's just done is extremely risky considering the stable economic growth we were experiencing. It IS an increase in what you owe! (I ain't paying my share lol). I hope he hasn't just repeated the mistakes that the Republicans have made (at least twice!) before. As I said. Wait and see. I'm keeping myself liquid.
2. Ostensibly He is. BUT, Military strength BEGINS with economic strength. He just gambled with that!
3. YOU have far too much bias. As a citizen of the USA.......... MY priorities concern US, and global health (world peace, survivability, etc) So should yours! You live here now. Boston area? Let the Israeli's take care of themselves!. I have no axe to grind with Israel. They have been a solid ally and good friend. NOT everything their Gov't has done is supportable by unbiased people who aren't Israelis.
OUR role (as a Country) SHOULD be to promote Peace between ALL the peoples involved. Fairly! Without an agenda favoring ANY of the participants. It is MY belief that WE (the USA) shouldn't be giving money to ANY foreign powers (or Gov'ts) for the purpose of influence or attempting interference in the matters of other Nation/States internally!! (With some very select exemptions for the CIA and National Security)

The rest is about the quality of OUR citizen's LIVES! THAT is NOT noise. It just reveals the shortsightedness of YOUR judgments and opinions on political matters! And why they should not be paid much attention, too. Because they are flawed with horrible bias and self-assured baseless confidence.

No offense meant because I'm quite sure you're a good guy. You love baseball. Your wife and family, our Country, etc. Makes you like the rest of us. Occasionally wrong and VERY imperfect.
2/14/2018 12:12 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 2/14/2018 11:56:00 AM (view original):
I care about:

#1) Economy: is DJT a business friendly POTUS? --- YES
#2) Military: Is DJT a military supportive POTUS (spend more) --- YES
#3) Israel: Does DJT support Israel or support giving money to their enemies such as Iran and the Palestine state. --- Israel

He checks my three primary boxes. The rest is noise.
maybe to you the rest is noise. It may be more than noise to other people.
2/14/2018 12:19 PM
Posted by The Taint on 2/13/2018 10:09:00 PM (view original):
It's all good folks, the lawyer footed the bill:


Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s longtime personal lawyer, said on Tuesday that he paid $130,000 out of his own pocket to a pornographic-film actress who had once claimed to have had an affair with Mr. Trump.

In the most detailed explanation of the 2016 payment made to the actress, Stephanie Clifford, Mr. Cohen, who worked as a counsel to the Trump Organization for more than a decade, said he was not reimbursed for the payment.

“Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly,” Mr. Cohen said in a statement to The New York Times. “The payment to Ms. Clifford was lawful, and was not a campaign contribution or a campaign expenditure by anyone.”

He declined to answer several follow-up questions, including whether Mr. Trump had been aware that he made the payment, what the motivation was or whether he had made similar payments to other people over the years.

Mr. Cohen has previously said that Mr. Trump has denied an affair with Ms. Clifford, whose stage name is Stormy Daniels.

Mr. Cohen’s statement about what he called “a private transaction” was the first time that he has acknowledged a role in the payment, which was first reported in January by The Wall Street Journal.

Mr. Cohen said that he had given a similar statement to the Federal Election Commission in response to a complaint filed by the government watchdog group Common Cause, which filed a complaint saying that the payment, which was made through a limited liability company that Mr. Cohen established, was an in-kind contribution to the Trump campaign.

Officials with Common Cause also sought to determine whether the payment was made by the Trump Organization or another person.

“The complaint alleges that I somehow violated campaign finance laws by facilitating an excess, in-kind contribution,” Mr. Cohen said in his statement. “The allegations in the complaint are factually unsupported and without legal merit, and my counsel has submitted a response to the F.E.C.”

He said he would not make any additional comments about the commission complaint “or regarding Ms. Clifford.”

Mr. Cohen was among Mr. Trump’s fiercest defenders during his time at the Trump Organization, often telling reporters during the 2016 presidential campaign that even false information about Mr. Trump could be damaging if printed. Ms. Clifford had told her story to the magazine In Touch in 2011, as well as the gossip website TheDirty.com. Both accounts were published last month after the report of the 2016 payment.

In fall 2016, Ms. Clifford was once again in discussion with news outlets, this time more mainstream. The payment from Mr. Cohen to Ms. Clifford reportedly came a few weeks before Election Day.

Ms. Clifford has not publicly denied an affair with Mr. Trump. A statement released by Mr. Cohen in her name in January denied an affair, but in interviews, she has refused to directly answer questions about it.

THIS is the most unbelievable piece of unmitigated BULLSHIT I've ever heard claimed!!!!

Have you EVER met a lawyer??? Does anyone here believe that ANY lawyer ANY time would reach into his or her OWN POCKET to pay off a "settlement" of this amount of $$$ for anyone he/she represents without recompense????? That is just wild!!!!

IF any of you readers/posters are willing to believe that this LAWYER actually did what HE is claiming he did (forking over real MONEY out of his OWN pocket for a client!) F'ing RIDICULOUS!!! That's NOT how lawyers work and there isn't an attorney in America who would stand personal expense on behalf of a client!!! I'd bet it violates some sort of ethical Canon of Lawyers! How can somebody expect someone to "drain the swamp" when HE is (and has been) a MAJOR member of the very same swamp of liars and crooks?? Foolish rabbit.
2/14/2018 12:21 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 2/14/2018 12:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 2/14/2018 11:56:00 AM (view original):
I care about:

#1) Economy: is DJT a business friendly POTUS? --- YES
#2) Military: Is DJT a military supportive POTUS (spend more) --- YES
#3) Israel: Does DJT support Israel or support giving money to their enemies such as Iran and the Palestine state. --- Israel

He checks my three primary boxes. The rest is noise.
maybe to you the rest is noise. It may be more than noise to other people.
I only care about myself. Not other people. You do you and I do me.
2/14/2018 12:33 PM
Posted by laramiebob on 2/14/2018 12:12:00 PM (view original):
Boris. In direct response.

1. He is BIG business friendly sure. Is he a business friendly Pres. overall? We don't know. Time will tell. Some say what he's just done is extremely risky considering the stable economic growth we were experiencing. It IS an increase in what you owe! (I ain't paying my share lol). I hope he hasn't just repeated the mistakes that the Republicans have made (at least twice!) before. As I said. Wait and see. I'm keeping myself liquid.
2. Ostensibly He is. BUT, Military strength BEGINS with economic strength. He just gambled with that!
3. YOU have far too much bias. As a citizen of the USA.......... MY priorities concern US, and global health (world peace, survivability, etc) So should yours! You live here now. Boston area? Let the Israeli's take care of themselves!. I have no axe to grind with Israel. They have been a solid ally and good friend. NOT everything their Gov't has done is supportable by unbiased people who aren't Israelis.
OUR role (as a Country) SHOULD be to promote Peace between ALL the peoples involved. Fairly! Without an agenda favoring ANY of the participants. It is MY belief that WE (the USA) shouldn't be giving money to ANY foreign powers (or Gov'ts) for the purpose of influence or attempting interference in the matters of other Nation/States internally!! (With some very select exemptions for the CIA and National Security)

The rest is about the quality of OUR citizen's LIVES! THAT is NOT noise. It just reveals the shortsightedness of YOUR judgments and opinions on political matters! And why they should not be paid much attention, too. Because they are flawed with horrible bias and self-assured baseless confidence.

No offense meant because I'm quite sure you're a good guy. You love baseball. Your wife and family, our Country, etc. Makes you like the rest of us. Occasionally wrong and VERY imperfect.
1) We agree
2) We agree
3) Israel is our ally. Iran is not. Case closed. Tough to promote peace with those who don't want peace.

To me the rest is noise. To you it is not. Opinions vary. You have your vote and I have mine.

2/14/2018 12:37 PM
All true Boris.
As I suspect with most thinking folks. When you get down to reality (basics) we're all not that far apart.
It's a shame that thinking Americans split the vote and let uninformed idiots voting on who know what basis control the outcomes.
But such is the case. Society is quickly melting down to the lowest common denominator. It's called numbers/volume.
Mediocrity (and worse) dominates. Quality of thought and action is nearly irrelevant any longer.
Hence guys like Chump and Dense. I ask again (as I have in many many elections before this last one) Is this REALLY the best we can do??

Treat the ladies in your life well today. It avoids problems later!
2/14/2018 1:07 PM
what good is business friendly if he destroys the economy...none other then the ceo of goldman saches said today that trump is in the process of blowing up the economy...the ceo criticized more spending on top of massive tax cuts which were wrong in the time of a good economy.
2/14/2018 1:19 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
◂ Prev 1...217|218|219|220|221...530 Next ▸
LEAVE MY ELEVATOR ALONE Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.