Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):
Does slavery and Jim Crow still affect black people? I want a yes/no answer.

Bad policing? If you get arrested when you are innocent, you go to jail, lose your job, and have that on your record the rest of your life. If you get killed, well, you are dead.

Netenyahu is.

#1) IT depends on your definition of affect. If you believe the Holocaust still affects Jews then "Yes" if you don't then "No". It affects them in my opinion because they don't have the benefits of generational wealth. But that is the only way. And that impact cannot be cured.

#2) This is true for all races. You are a moron. You didn't answer my question. Learn to read.

#3) In your opinion. You have zero proof. Other than what you see on CNN.

Keep up the good work.

#1) OK. So it does affect them. This has been my point the entire time. We agree. If a racist institutional practice affects them, then that is institutional racism. Case closed.

#2) INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET ARRESTED MORE. INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET KILLED AT A HIGHER RATE. THIS MEANS THAT IT AFFECTS BLACK PEOPLE DISPROPORTIONALLY.

#3) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/middleeast/netanyahu-corruption-probes-israel-intl/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/police-question-benjamin-netanyahu-over-third-corruption-case
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-corruption-arrests-20180218-story.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43051249

I don't watch CNN btw.

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:33:00 AM (view original):
If you answer yes, then they face institutional racism. If you answer no, then why does the 70-40 split occur?

What 70-40 split are you referring to? Is the NBA racist? Y or N?

If N then why is it 75% black?

Single parent rates. 70% for black people and 30% white people.

N.

There are a couple of cultural practices. One is that basketball is typically a cheaper sport to get into and you really don't have to compete privately to get really good at a young age. Sports like baseball, soccer, football, etc. are slightly harder to get into in the USA. The NBA was one of the first leagues to fully accept black people in their league. So young people see their heroes growing up playing basketball and they want to do it too. Those are a couple reasons right there.

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):
Does slavery and Jim Crow still affect black people? I want a yes/no answer.

Bad policing? If you get arrested when you are innocent, you go to jail, lose your job, and have that on your record the rest of your life. If you get killed, well, you are dead.

Netenyahu is.

#1) IT depends on your definition of affect. If you believe the Holocaust still affects Jews then "Yes" if you don't then "No". It affects them in my opinion because they don't have the benefits of generational wealth. But that is the only way. And that impact cannot be cured.

#2) This is true for all races. You are a moron. You didn't answer my question. Learn to read.

#3) In your opinion. You have zero proof. Other than what you see on CNN.

Keep up the good work.

#1) OK. So it does affect them. This has been my point the entire time. We agree. If a racist institutional practice affects them, then that is institutional racism. Case closed.

#2) INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET ARRESTED MORE. INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET KILLED AT A HIGHER RATE. THIS MEANS THAT IT AFFECTS BLACK PEOPLE DISPROPORTIONALLY.

#3) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/middleeast/netanyahu-corruption-probes-israel-intl/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/police-question-benjamin-netanyahu-over-third-corruption-case
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-corruption-arrests-20180218-story.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43051249

I don't watch CNN btw.

#1) WAS!!! WAS!!! WAS!!! NOT IS!!! That is like asking if slavery affects them. UGH!!! Case NOT Closed. You dummy. LOL.

#2) No it doesn't. The NBA is 75% black. So does that mean that owners are prejudiced against white players?!?!??! NO!!

#3) CNN is FAKE NEWS.

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:33:00 AM (view original):
If you answer yes, then they face institutional racism. If you answer no, then why does the 70-40 split occur?

What 70-40 split are you referring to? Is the NBA racist? Y or N?

If N then why is it 75% black?

Single parent rates. 70% for black people and 30% white people.

N.

There are a couple of cultural practices. One is that basketball is typically a cheaper sport to get into and you really don't have to compete privately to get really good at a young age. Sports like baseball, soccer, football, etc. are slightly harder to get into in the USA. The NBA was one of the first leagues to fully accept black people in their league. So young people see their heroes growing up playing basketball and they want to do it too. Those are a couple reasons right there.

40% for white people. Because culturally it is deemed as OK. Not so in other cultures such as Jewish and Asian American.

1. Soccer is just as cheap to play. Mostly white people play it.
2. NFL is 68% black. That is an expensive sport. So are the NFL owners also prejudice? Do tell.
3. Baseball started accepting black people in 1947. Well before people even knew what the NBA was. Your narrative is false, sports journalist. And they had ridiculous stars like Willie Mays, Frank Robinson, Maury Wills, to name a few. Baseball is 70% white. Are the owners racist?

There is no prejudice anywhere here. Each person should be looked upon as an individual. That is the correct rhetoric. Yours is dangerous and annoying.

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):
Does slavery and Jim Crow still affect black people? I want a yes/no answer.

Bad policing? If you get arrested when you are innocent, you go to jail, lose your job, and have that on your record the rest of your life. If you get killed, well, you are dead.

Netenyahu is.

#1) IT depends on your definition of affect. If you believe the Holocaust still affects Jews then "Yes" if you don't then "No". It affects them in my opinion because they don't have the benefits of generational wealth. But that is the only way. And that impact cannot be cured.

#2) This is true for all races. You are a moron. You didn't answer my question. Learn to read.

#3) In your opinion. You have zero proof. Other than what you see on CNN.

Keep up the good work.

#1) OK. So it does affect them. This has been my point the entire time. We agree. If a racist institutional practice affects them, then that is institutional racism. Case closed.

#2) INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET ARRESTED MORE. INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET KILLED AT A HIGHER RATE. THIS MEANS THAT IT AFFECTS BLACK PEOPLE DISPROPORTIONALLY.

#3) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/middleeast/netanyahu-corruption-probes-israel-intl/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/police-question-benjamin-netanyahu-over-third-corruption-case
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-corruption-arrests-20180218-story.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43051249

I don't watch CNN btw.

#1) WAS!!! WAS!!! WAS!!! NOT IS!!! That is like asking if slavery affects them. UGH!!! Case NOT Closed. You dummy. LOL.

#2) No it doesn't. The NBA is 75% black. So does that mean that owners are prejudiced against white players?!?!??! NO!!

#3) CNN is FAKE NEWS.

#1) You just said it still affects them. If it still affects them, then that is institutional racism. I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

#2) What? That example doesn't make sense. Please explain why more innocent black people get arrested and convicted.

#3) So is the Guardian? So is the LA Times? So is BBC? So is the NY Times? What? HEAD IN THE SAND.

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:33:00 AM (view original):
If you answer yes, then they face institutional racism. If you answer no, then why does the 70-40 split occur?

What 70-40 split are you referring to? Is the NBA racist? Y or N?

If N then why is it 75% black?

Single parent rates. 70% for black people and 30% white people.

N.

There are a couple of cultural practices. One is that basketball is typically a cheaper sport to get into and you really don't have to compete privately to get really good at a young age. Sports like baseball, soccer, football, etc. are slightly harder to get into in the USA. The NBA was one of the first leagues to fully accept black people in their league. So young people see their heroes growing up playing basketball and they want to do it too. Those are a couple reasons right there.

40% for white people. Because culturally it is deemed as OK. Not so in other cultures such as Jewish and Asian American.

1. Soccer is just as cheap to play. Mostly white people play it.
2. NFL is 68% black. That is an expensive sport. So are the NFL owners also prejudice? Do tell.
3. Baseball started accepting black people in 1947. Well before people even knew what the NBA was. Your narrative is false, sports journalist. And they had ridiculous stars like Willie Mays, Frank Robinson, Maury Wills, to name a few. Baseball is 70% white. Are the owners racist?

There is no prejudice anywhere here. Each person should be looked upon as an individual. That is the correct rhetoric. Yours is dangerous and annoying.

Mb. So black culture is inferior?

1. Soccer is pretty unpopular in the USA, and in the USA it is just as expensive as baseball. People don't go out and play soccer with their friends. They do with basketball.
2. This also links with the 'accepting black players' stuff. Football is very popular. Lots of rich families don't let their sons play it.
3. Yeah, but they didn't 'accept' them. They were not 'accepted' until the late 60's. And baseball is not 70% white. Far more latinos play it. Your narrative is false. Also baseball, sadly, isn't played as much anymore. Not many go out to the sandlot and play anymore. Again, if it needs to be organized, more white people will play it.

Correct. Unfortunately, right now, everyone is not looked upon as an individual. We must acknowledge that.

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):
Does slavery and Jim Crow still affect black people? I want a yes/no answer.

Bad policing? If you get arrested when you are innocent, you go to jail, lose your job, and have that on your record the rest of your life. If you get killed, well, you are dead.

Netenyahu is.

#1) IT depends on your definition of affect. If you believe the Holocaust still affects Jews then "Yes" if you don't then "No". It affects them in my opinion because they don't have the benefits of generational wealth. But that is the only way. And that impact cannot be cured.

#2) This is true for all races. You are a moron. You didn't answer my question. Learn to read.

#3) In your opinion. You have zero proof. Other than what you see on CNN.

Keep up the good work.

#1) OK. So it does affect them. This has been my point the entire time. We agree. If a racist institutional practice affects them, then that is institutional racism. Case closed.

#2) INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET ARRESTED MORE. INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET KILLED AT A HIGHER RATE. THIS MEANS THAT IT AFFECTS BLACK PEOPLE DISPROPORTIONALLY.

#3) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/middleeast/netanyahu-corruption-probes-israel-intl/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/police-question-benjamin-netanyahu-over-third-corruption-case
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-corruption-arrests-20180218-story.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43051249

I don't watch CNN btw.

#1) WAS!!! WAS!!! WAS!!! NOT IS!!! That is like asking if slavery affects them. UGH!!! Case NOT Closed. You dummy. LOL.

#2) No it doesn't. The NBA is 75% black. So does that mean that owners are prejudiced against white players?!?!??! NO!!

#3) CNN is FAKE NEWS.

#1) You just said it still affects them. If it still affects them, then that is institutional racism. I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

#2) What? That example doesn't make sense. Please explain why more innocent black people get arrested and convicted.

#3) So is the Guardian? So is the LA Times? So is BBC? So is the NY Times? What? HEAD IN THE SAND.

#1) You IDIOT!!! What happened before was RACISM and affects future generations. LMAO. Do you not understand English? I am seriously puzzled why you cannot understand this.

#2) They do? Show stats. As a % of arrests I think just as many "innocents" get arrested black or white. More black people are arrested because statistically they commit more crimes because they come from single parent households. I have already told you this 100000x. More arrests = more mistakes.

#3) Read the WSJ. There is a difference between news and editorials.

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 1:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:33:00 AM (view original):
If you answer yes, then they face institutional racism. If you answer no, then why does the 70-40 split occur?

What 70-40 split are you referring to? Is the NBA racist? Y or N?

If N then why is it 75% black?

Single parent rates. 70% for black people and 30% white people.

N.

There are a couple of cultural practices. One is that basketball is typically a cheaper sport to get into and you really don't have to compete privately to get really good at a young age. Sports like baseball, soccer, football, etc. are slightly harder to get into in the USA. The NBA was one of the first leagues to fully accept black people in their league. So young people see their heroes growing up playing basketball and they want to do it too. Those are a couple reasons right there.

40% for white people. Because culturally it is deemed as OK. Not so in other cultures such as Jewish and Asian American.

1. Soccer is just as cheap to play. Mostly white people play it.
2. NFL is 68% black. That is an expensive sport. So are the NFL owners also prejudice? Do tell.
3. Baseball started accepting black people in 1947. Well before people even knew what the NBA was. Your narrative is false, sports journalist. And they had ridiculous stars like Willie Mays, Frank Robinson, Maury Wills, to name a few. Baseball is 70% white. Are the owners racist?

There is no prejudice anywhere here. Each person should be looked upon as an individual. That is the correct rhetoric. Yours is dangerous and annoying.

Mb. So black culture is inferior?

1. Soccer is pretty unpopular in the USA, and in the USA it is just as expensive as baseball. People don't go out and play soccer with their friends. They do with basketball.
2. This also links with the 'accepting black players' stuff. Football is very popular. Lots of rich families don't let their sons play it.
3. Yeah, but they didn't 'accept' them. They were not 'accepted' until the late 60's. And baseball is not 70% white. Far more latinos play it. Your narrative is false. Also baseball, sadly, isn't played as much anymore. Not many go out to the sandlot and play anymore. Again, if it needs to be organized, more white people will play it.

Correct. Unfortunately, right now, everyone is not looked upon as an individual. We must acknowledge that.

#1) Inferior is subjective but the practice of single parenting is inferior to dual parenting and any culture that accepts that is inferior for ONLY that aspect. YES. Everyone should convert to Judaism ASAP. This is tongue in cheek.

#2) Subjective. A ton of "rich parents" let their sons play it. See Tom Brady. Josh Rosen comes from mega millionaires. Your narrative is idiotic.

#3) It is 70% white in MLB. Check the stats. No. Some didn't accept them and many did. Pee Wee Reese being one of many. You lost the narrative. My point is there is NO INSTITUTIONAL RACISM. There is still some individual racism.

We must do nothing of the sort. We must make them look at individuals only and stop these crazy accusations and hateful verbiage of "institutional racism" and "white privilege".

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 1:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):
Does slavery and Jim Crow still affect black people? I want a yes/no answer.

Bad policing? If you get arrested when you are innocent, you go to jail, lose your job, and have that on your record the rest of your life. If you get killed, well, you are dead.

Netenyahu is.

#1) IT depends on your definition of affect. If you believe the Holocaust still affects Jews then "Yes" if you don't then "No". It affects them in my opinion because they don't have the benefits of generational wealth. But that is the only way. And that impact cannot be cured.

#2) This is true for all races. You are a moron. You didn't answer my question. Learn to read.

#3) In your opinion. You have zero proof. Other than what you see on CNN.

Keep up the good work.

#1) OK. So it does affect them. This has been my point the entire time. We agree. If a racist institutional practice affects them, then that is institutional racism. Case closed.

#2) INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET ARRESTED MORE. INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET KILLED AT A HIGHER RATE. THIS MEANS THAT IT AFFECTS BLACK PEOPLE DISPROPORTIONALLY.

#3) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/middleeast/netanyahu-corruption-probes-israel-intl/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/police-question-benjamin-netanyahu-over-third-corruption-case
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-corruption-arrests-20180218-story.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43051249

I don't watch CNN btw.

#1) WAS!!! WAS!!! WAS!!! NOT IS!!! That is like asking if slavery affects them. UGH!!! Case NOT Closed. You dummy. LOL.

#2) No it doesn't. The NBA is 75% black. So does that mean that owners are prejudiced against white players?!?!??! NO!!

#3) CNN is FAKE NEWS.

#1) You just said it still affects them. If it still affects them, then that is institutional racism. I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

#2) What? That example doesn't make sense. Please explain why more innocent black people get arrested and convicted.

#3) So is the Guardian? So is the LA Times? So is BBC? So is the NY Times? What? HEAD IN THE SAND.

#1) You IDIOT!!! What happened before was RACISM and affects future generations. LMAO. Do you not understand English? I am seriously puzzled why you cannot understand this.

#2) They do? Show stats. As a % of arrests I think just as many "innocents" get arrested black or white. More black people are arrested because statistically they commit more crimes because they come from single parent households. I have already told you this 100000x. More arrests = more mistakes.

#3) Read the WSJ. There is a difference between news and editorials.

#1) Correct. That is institutional racism.

#2) https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/7/14834454/exoneration-innocence-prison-racism
http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf
Yeah but that doesn't make sense. If everyone was treated equally and on an individual level, the fact that black people commit more crimes should not come up in your mind when you come to arrest another black person. You are proving my point. That is exactly what is happening and it is not OK.

#3) None of those were editorials. They were all reporting a news story. I bet you didn't even read them.

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 1:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 1:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:33:00 AM (view original):
If you answer yes, then they face institutional racism. If you answer no, then why does the 70-40 split occur?

What 70-40 split are you referring to? Is the NBA racist? Y or N?

If N then why is it 75% black?

Single parent rates. 70% for black people and 30% white people.

N.

There are a couple of cultural practices. One is that basketball is typically a cheaper sport to get into and you really don't have to compete privately to get really good at a young age. Sports like baseball, soccer, football, etc. are slightly harder to get into in the USA. The NBA was one of the first leagues to fully accept black people in their league. So young people see their heroes growing up playing basketball and they want to do it too. Those are a couple reasons right there.

40% for white people. Because culturally it is deemed as OK. Not so in other cultures such as Jewish and Asian American.

1. Soccer is just as cheap to play. Mostly white people play it.
2. NFL is 68% black. That is an expensive sport. So are the NFL owners also prejudice? Do tell.
3. Baseball started accepting black people in 1947. Well before people even knew what the NBA was. Your narrative is false, sports journalist. And they had ridiculous stars like Willie Mays, Frank Robinson, Maury Wills, to name a few. Baseball is 70% white. Are the owners racist?

There is no prejudice anywhere here. Each person should be looked upon as an individual. That is the correct rhetoric. Yours is dangerous and annoying.

Mb. So black culture is inferior?

1. Soccer is pretty unpopular in the USA, and in the USA it is just as expensive as baseball. People don't go out and play soccer with their friends. They do with basketball.
2. This also links with the 'accepting black players' stuff. Football is very popular. Lots of rich families don't let their sons play it.
3. Yeah, but they didn't 'accept' them. They were not 'accepted' until the late 60's. And baseball is not 70% white. Far more latinos play it. Your narrative is false. Also baseball, sadly, isn't played as much anymore. Not many go out to the sandlot and play anymore. Again, if it needs to be organized, more white people will play it.

Correct. Unfortunately, right now, everyone is not looked upon as an individual. We must acknowledge that.

#1) Inferior is subjective but the practice of single parenting is inferior to dual parenting and any culture that accepts that is inferior for ONLY that aspect. YES. Everyone should convert to Judaism ASAP. This is tongue in cheek.

#2) Subjective. A ton of "rich parents" let their sons play it. See Tom Brady. Josh Rosen comes from mega millionaires. Your narrative is idiotic.

#3) It is 70% white in MLB. Check the stats. No. Some didn't accept them and many did. Pee Wee Reese being one of many. You lost the narrative. My point is there is NO INSTITUTIONAL RACISM. There is still some individual racism.

We must do nothing of the sort. We must make them look at individuals only and stop these crazy accusations and hateful verbiage of "institutional racism" and "white privilege".

#1) Yeah, no. That's pretty hateful, if anything.

#2) Really? Are they the exception or the rule?

#3) It's 60%. I mean the owners. Not every team had them until the late 50's. I disproved your disproval.

Yeah, but as you yourself have inadvertently stated, people are not treated that way.

OMG

This is pointless. You are too dumb to debate this. You will just go on with your parroting and race divisive rhetoric. Stay away from my kids.

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 1:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 1:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):
Does slavery and Jim Crow still affect black people? I want a yes/no answer.

Bad policing? If you get arrested when you are innocent, you go to jail, lose your job, and have that on your record the rest of your life. If you get killed, well, you are dead.

Netenyahu is.

#1) IT depends on your definition of affect. If you believe the Holocaust still affects Jews then "Yes" if you don't then "No". It affects them in my opinion because they don't have the benefits of generational wealth. But that is the only way. And that impact cannot be cured.

#2) This is true for all races. You are a moron. You didn't answer my question. Learn to read.

#3) In your opinion. You have zero proof. Other than what you see on CNN.

Keep up the good work.

#1) OK. So it does affect them. This has been my point the entire time. We agree. If a racist institutional practice affects them, then that is institutional racism. Case closed.

#2) INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET ARRESTED MORE. INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET KILLED AT A HIGHER RATE. THIS MEANS THAT IT AFFECTS BLACK PEOPLE DISPROPORTIONALLY.

#3) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/middleeast/netanyahu-corruption-probes-israel-intl/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/police-question-benjamin-netanyahu-over-third-corruption-case
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-corruption-arrests-20180218-story.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43051249

I don't watch CNN btw.

#1) WAS!!! WAS!!! WAS!!! NOT IS!!! That is like asking if slavery affects them. UGH!!! Case NOT Closed. You dummy. LOL.

#2) No it doesn't. The NBA is 75% black. So does that mean that owners are prejudiced against white players?!?!??! NO!!

#3) CNN is FAKE NEWS.

#1) You just said it still affects them. If it still affects them, then that is institutional racism. I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

#2) What? That example doesn't make sense. Please explain why more innocent black people get arrested and convicted.

#3) So is the Guardian? So is the LA Times? So is BBC? So is the NY Times? What? HEAD IN THE SAND.

#1) You IDIOT!!! What happened before was RACISM and affects future generations. LMAO. Do you not understand English? I am seriously puzzled why you cannot understand this.

#2) They do? Show stats. As a % of arrests I think just as many "innocents" get arrested black or white. More black people are arrested because statistically they commit more crimes because they come from single parent households. I have already told you this 100000x. More arrests = more mistakes.

#3) Read the WSJ. There is a difference between news and editorials.

#1) Correct. That is institutional racism.

#2) https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/7/14834454/exoneration-innocence-prison-racism
http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf
Yeah but that doesn't make sense. If everyone was treated equally and on an individual level, the fact that black people commit more crimes should not come up in your mind when you come to arrest another black person. You are proving my point. That is exactly what is happening and it is not OK.

#3) None of those were editorials. They were all reporting a news story. I bet you didn't even read them.

#1) HOW? Those institutions such as MLB no longer practice this racism??!?!?!

#2) We agreed that policing needs to be improved but dual parenting would cause a lot less need to arrest people.

#3) Everything in CNN has an air of editorials. I refuse to give that network any viewership or readership. Sorry. I am not even sure if they declared DJT the President yet...

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 1:47:00 PM (view original):
OMG

This is pointless. You are too dumb to debate this. You will just go on with your parroting and race divisive rhetoric. Stay away from my kids.

Right. I hate how you go back on what you say and parrot everything over and over. I trapped you in a logical corner and you need a way out.

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 1:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 1:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 1:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):
Does slavery and Jim Crow still affect black people? I want a yes/no answer.

Bad policing? If you get arrested when you are innocent, you go to jail, lose your job, and have that on your record the rest of your life. If you get killed, well, you are dead.

Netenyahu is.

#1) IT depends on your definition of affect. If you believe the Holocaust still affects Jews then "Yes" if you don't then "No". It affects them in my opinion because they don't have the benefits of generational wealth. But that is the only way. And that impact cannot be cured.

#2) This is true for all races. You are a moron. You didn't answer my question. Learn to read.

#3) In your opinion. You have zero proof. Other than what you see on CNN.

Keep up the good work.

#1) OK. So it does affect them. This has been my point the entire time. We agree. If a racist institutional practice affects them, then that is institutional racism. Case closed.

#2) INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET ARRESTED MORE. INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE GET KILLED AT A HIGHER RATE. THIS MEANS THAT IT AFFECTS BLACK PEOPLE DISPROPORTIONALLY.

#3) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/middleeast/netanyahu-corruption-probes-israel-intl/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/police-question-benjamin-netanyahu-over-third-corruption-case
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-corruption-arrests-20180218-story.html
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43051249

I don't watch CNN btw.

#1) WAS!!! WAS!!! WAS!!! NOT IS!!! That is like asking if slavery affects them. UGH!!! Case NOT Closed. You dummy. LOL.

#2) No it doesn't. The NBA is 75% black. So does that mean that owners are prejudiced against white players?!?!??! NO!!

#3) CNN is FAKE NEWS.

#1) You just said it still affects them. If it still affects them, then that is institutional racism. I don't see what part of this you don't understand.

#2) What? That example doesn't make sense. Please explain why more innocent black people get arrested and convicted.

#3) So is the Guardian? So is the LA Times? So is BBC? So is the NY Times? What? HEAD IN THE SAND.

#1) You IDIOT!!! What happened before was RACISM and affects future generations. LMAO. Do you not understand English? I am seriously puzzled why you cannot understand this.

#2) They do? Show stats. As a % of arrests I think just as many "innocents" get arrested black or white. More black people are arrested because statistically they commit more crimes because they come from single parent households. I have already told you this 100000x. More arrests = more mistakes.

#3) Read the WSJ. There is a difference between news and editorials.

#1) Correct. That is institutional racism.

#2) https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/7/14834454/exoneration-innocence-prison-racism
http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf
Yeah but that doesn't make sense. If everyone was treated equally and on an individual level, the fact that black people commit more crimes should not come up in your mind when you come to arrest another black person. You are proving my point. That is exactly what is happening and it is not OK.

#3) None of those were editorials. They were all reporting a news story. I bet you didn't even read them.

#1) HOW? Those institutions such as MLB no longer practice this racism??!?!?!

#2) We agreed that policing needs to be improved but dual parenting would cause a lot less need to arrest people.

#3) Everything in CNN has an air of editorials. I refuse to give that network any viewership or readership. Sorry. I am not even sure if they declared DJT the President yet...

#1) Yeah, but again, if it still affects us, it still is institutional racism. I don't know if you understand what institutional racism means.

#2) Sure... I guess?

#3) Ok, ignore the CNN one.... What about the others? Is BBC fake news?

We agree on more than you think. We just need to iron out all our definitions.

Posted by tangplay on 5/8/2018 1:54:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/8/2018 1:47:00 PM (view original):
OMG

This is pointless. You are too dumb to debate this. You will just go on with your parroting and race divisive rhetoric. Stay away from my kids.

Right. I hate how you go back on what you say and parrot everything over and over. I trapped you in a logical corner and you need a way out.

LMAO? No. the fact that you think it is logical is why it can no longer be debated.

#1) Slavery was bad and evil
#2) The positive was that it brought people to the US from a 3rd world country and future generations get to live in the US.
#3) Unfortunately we just started treating people fairly recently. That includes racial and gender minorities.
#4) I am in the same boat as most African Americans. I didn't come from generational wealth. I had to work 2 jobs for 15 years or so to afford a house and such.

There is no MORE institutional racism. There is no logical corner. Because there is no logic with you.

You are deranged. And dumb.