I didn't hear that, Doug.

WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - US President Donald Trump's administration is asking Congress to cancel US$15 billion (S$20.04 billion) in unspent government funds.

Which AREAS are they in, Doug? Why aren't they spent?

Which AREAS are they in, Doug? Why aren't they spent?

We could build some wall with that money. And the savings from that would allow us to build more wall until we couldn't spend it anymore.

We could call that savings. Savings from spending on education and healthcare for illegals. We could spend it on our own children.

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 7:52:00 PM (view original):
Which AREAS are they in, Doug? Why aren't they spent?

That's a good question. You should ask it twice. I would answer it once.

OF COURSE I know you'll hit us up on education and children etc.

BUT that is the whole point. SOMEBODY still couldn't spend all the money. AND don't be a prima donna. That money goes to adults to pay for their playtime.

EVERYBODY here in Realville knows about money. NOT in Washington. NOT in the bubble.

MONEY isn't real in the bubble and kids are just a concept. And no matter what happens, the government will take care of them.

And I'm the government. And we're broke. Here in Realville.

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 4:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 3:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 11:53:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Yes, but most young people then start making real money by the age of 35 and slowly turn to logic. Idiot Tang does not understand basic math even if the tax rate is 37%. Someone who made $100mil is paying $37 mil in taxes. How much more does Tang want that person to pay? Honestly. Someone who makes $100k and is in the 25% bracket pays $25k.

Hmmmm....$37mil vs. $25k? Lets tax the rich more!!!!!!!!!

Tang needs to learn percents and what an "ally" is. He is a total moron. Actually I just insulted morons by calling Tang a moron.

Right. So let's say we adopt the CCCP proposal. Tax based on actual money payed, not percent. We have two options.

1. Make the poor pay 37 million dollars of their income every year and.... Wait... Poor people don't own 37 million dollars..Ok..

2. Lower the taxes the rich pays to 25k! Yeah! Equality! Also the Feds won't raise any money and the world economy collapses!

Look at it on the flip side. The rich take home 73 million per year. The 100k person takes home 73k per year. If we wanted to raise money, who would be the best option to raise taxes on? I wonder...

You idiot it is "paid" not "payed".

The poor pay nothing. They receive an earned income credit. The rich pay enough and employ persons such a landscaper or a housekeeper. We need to spend less not tax more. We need to clean up corruption and we certainly need people like you to get a clue.

Yes, the $73mil that person EARNED to do with as he pleases. That is called capitalism. If you don't like it then move.

OK, so if the poor paying 'nothing' is a problem then how do we fix it? What would a perfect world look like to you?

I agree that we need to make cuts. Again, I suggested cutting the military budget significantly. What would you cut, CCCP?

Yep. Take home that 73 mil and do whatever the hell you want.

#1) Raise the retirement age to 72
#2) Reduce and or eliminate numerous Gov't pensions
#3) Ban Lobbying
#4) Reduce entitlements. Give elderly vouchers for meds so they don't just go because they are bored. Same for disabled, etc.
#5) Amend pharma laws for more generic drugs
#6) Work with insurance companies to cover more at lower costs. Under ACA the insurance companies benefited from historic profits. I am sure that was not the intent.Then again with BHO anything is possible.
#7) The military provides millions of jobs and inventions that is not the problem. Dumbass. I have told you this 1000000x.

I'd start there

Posted by DougOut on 5/13/2018 8:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 7:52:00 PM (view original):
Which AREAS are they in, Doug? Why aren't they spent?

That's a good question. You should ask it twice. I would answer it once.

OF COURSE I know you'll hit us up on education and children etc.

BUT that is the whole point. SOMEBODY still couldn't spend all the money. AND don't be a prima donna. That money goes to adults to pay for their playtime.

EVERYBODY here in Realville knows about money. NOT in Washington. NOT in the bubble.

MONEY isn't real in the bubble and kids are just a concept. And no matter what happens, the government will take care of them.

And I'm the government. And we're broke. Here in Realville.

I'm the O'Reilly to your Stewart. The words outta your mouth don't comprehend with my brain. Please, answer my questions, and answer 'em straight.

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 8:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 4:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 3:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 11:53:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Yes, but most young people then start making real money by the age of 35 and slowly turn to logic. Idiot Tang does not understand basic math even if the tax rate is 37%. Someone who made $100mil is paying $37 mil in taxes. How much more does Tang want that person to pay? Honestly. Someone who makes $100k and is in the 25% bracket pays $25k.

Hmmmm....$37mil vs. $25k? Lets tax the rich more!!!!!!!!!

Tang needs to learn percents and what an "ally" is. He is a total moron. Actually I just insulted morons by calling Tang a moron.

Right. So let's say we adopt the CCCP proposal. Tax based on actual money payed, not percent. We have two options.

1. Make the poor pay 37 million dollars of their income every year and.... Wait... Poor people don't own 37 million dollars..Ok..

2. Lower the taxes the rich pays to 25k! Yeah! Equality! Also the Feds won't raise any money and the world economy collapses!

Look at it on the flip side. The rich take home 73 million per year. The 100k person takes home 73k per year. If we wanted to raise money, who would be the best option to raise taxes on? I wonder...

You idiot it is "paid" not "payed".

The poor pay nothing. They receive an earned income credit. The rich pay enough and employ persons such a landscaper or a housekeeper. We need to spend less not tax more. We need to clean up corruption and we certainly need people like you to get a clue.

Yes, the $73mil that person EARNED to do with as he pleases. That is called capitalism. If you don't like it then move.

OK, so if the poor paying 'nothing' is a problem then how do we fix it? What would a perfect world look like to you?

I agree that we need to make cuts. Again, I suggested cutting the military budget significantly. What would you cut, CCCP?

Yep. Take home that 73 mil and do whatever the hell you want.

#1) Raise the retirement age to 72
#2) Reduce and or eliminate numerous Gov't pensions
#3) Ban Lobbying
#4) Reduce entitlements. Give elderly vouchers for meds so they don't just go because they are bored. Same for disabled, etc.
#5) Amend pharma laws for more generic drugs
#6) Work with insurance companies to cover more at lower costs. Under ACA the insurance companies benefited from historic profits. I am sure that was not the intent.Then again with BHO anything is possible.
#7) The military provides millions of jobs and inventions that is not the problem. Dumbass. I have told you this 1000000x.

I'd start there

1) What good will workers age 62-72 do?
2) Agreed
3) Agreed, but this won't save any money.
4) Not sure.
5) Not sure.
6) Not sure.
7) OK, this is totally wrong. First, cutting the military budget by 100 billion dollars doesn't actually lose many, if any jobs. Most of that money is on stupid tech that never works. We don't have a draft. Second, why the middleman? Japan doesn't spend much on military (We do it for them) and they have tons of innovation. We can do programs that help inventors without the middleman of military.

How much money would these 7 things save?

Posted by strikeout26 on 5/13/2018 8:15:00 AM (view original):
Keep punishing the ones who have worked hard and taken risks so that they can provide for those who haven't worked as hard and taken as many risks. Great idea, Tang.

what makes you think poor people don't work as hard as rich people?? Sure, some poor people don't work hard, if at all, just like some rich people work very hard but some don't work at all either.

#4) Reduce entitlements. Give elderly vouchers for meds so they don't just go because they are bored. Same for disabled, etc.


are you saying the elderly and disabled just get drugs because they are bored??

Posted by wylie715 on 5/13/2018 11:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 5/13/2018 8:15:00 AM (view original):
Keep punishing the ones who have worked hard and taken risks so that they can provide for those who haven't worked as hard and taken as many risks. Great idea, Tang.

what makes you think poor people don't work as hard as rich people?? Sure, some poor people don't work hard, if at all, just like some rich people work very hard but some don't work at all either.

i would wager a years pay that the average self made millionaire outworks the average poor person and they for sure took more financial risks.

I would bet you that the first part of that isn't true.

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 11:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 8:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 4:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 3:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/13/2018 11:53:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/13/2018 10:11:00 AM (view original):
Yes, but most young people then start making real money by the age of 35 and slowly turn to logic. Idiot Tang does not understand basic math even if the tax rate is 37%. Someone who made $100mil is paying $37 mil in taxes. How much more does Tang want that person to pay? Honestly. Someone who makes $100k and is in the 25% bracket pays $25k.

Hmmmm....$37mil vs. $25k? Lets tax the rich more!!!!!!!!!

Tang needs to learn percents and what an "ally" is. He is a total moron. Actually I just insulted morons by calling Tang a moron.

Right. So let's say we adopt the CCCP proposal. Tax based on actual money payed, not percent. We have two options.

1. Make the poor pay 37 million dollars of their income every year and.... Wait... Poor people don't own 37 million dollars..Ok..

2. Lower the taxes the rich pays to 25k! Yeah! Equality! Also the Feds won't raise any money and the world economy collapses!

Look at it on the flip side. The rich take home 73 million per year. The 100k person takes home 73k per year. If we wanted to raise money, who would be the best option to raise taxes on? I wonder...

You idiot it is "paid" not "payed".

The poor pay nothing. They receive an earned income credit. The rich pay enough and employ persons such a landscaper or a housekeeper. We need to spend less not tax more. We need to clean up corruption and we certainly need people like you to get a clue.

Yes, the $73mil that person EARNED to do with as he pleases. That is called capitalism. If you don't like it then move.

OK, so if the poor paying 'nothing' is a problem then how do we fix it? What would a perfect world look like to you?

I agree that we need to make cuts. Again, I suggested cutting the military budget significantly. What would you cut, CCCP?

Yep. Take home that 73 mil and do whatever the hell you want.

#1) Raise the retirement age to 72
#2) Reduce and or eliminate numerous Gov't pensions
#3) Ban Lobbying
#4) Reduce entitlements. Give elderly vouchers for meds so they don't just go because they are bored. Same for disabled, etc.
#5) Amend pharma laws for more generic drugs
#6) Work with insurance companies to cover more at lower costs. Under ACA the insurance companies benefited from historic profits. I am sure that was not the intent.Then again with BHO anything is possible.
#7) The military provides millions of jobs and inventions that is not the problem. Dumbass. I have told you this 1000000x.

I'd start there

1) What good will workers age 62-72 do?
2) Agreed
3) Agreed, but this won't save any money.
4) Not sure.
5) Not sure.
6) Not sure.
7) OK, this is totally wrong. First, cutting the military budget by 100 billion dollars doesn't actually lose many, if any jobs. Most of that money is on stupid tech that never works. We don't have a draft. Second, why the middleman? Japan doesn't spend much on military (We do it for them) and they have tons of innovation. We can do programs that help inventors without the middleman of military.

How much money would these 7 things save?

#1) My dad is 77. He retired at 66 from his career as an engineer. Got bored. Decided to do peoples taxes. He has over 250 clients. There are many jobs that people can do into their 70s. It also keeps you alert and in better health.
#2) Duh
#3) It will because now insurance companies cannot just wheel and deal and rip people off. There would be accountability.
#4) Better than no
#5) see #4
#6) see #5
#7) How do you know which tech works or doesn't work? It is top secret. Do you know anything about nano tech? Super expensive and super necessary. I would actually spend more not less. The military outsources most of the work to the private sector, so Mr. Big Government Idiot, those monies actually flow back to the people. Entitlements do not.

Your last question is impossible to answer as there are so many moving parts but I would say trillions due to the entitlements adjustments.

Posted by wylie715 on 5/14/2018 12:01:00 AM (view original):
#4) Reduce entitlements. Give elderly vouchers for meds so they don't just go because they are bored. Same for disabled, etc.


are you saying the elderly and disabled just get drugs because they are bored??

Not drugs. Visit MD offices because they have knee pain for example. You and I will shrug it off as we have work, etc. If you have nothing to do you go see the MD for any reason as its covered. Drugs should be generic and less expensive.