THEMUELLER CHRONICLES INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT Topic

paul manafort was sent to jail today until his trial because of witness tampering........trump said in response that manafort had very little to do with the campaign.
6/15/2018 12:01 PM
Prosecutors haven't tied Manafort, Gates and Kilimnik's alleged wrongdoings to the actions of the Trump campaign, which is at the core of Mueller's investigation. However, prosecutors have said in several previous court filings they are looking into Manafort's contacts with Russians and Ukrainians -- including Kilimnik -- and possible coordination he may have orchestrated with them while he oversaw the campaign.
6/15/2018 12:08 PM
he was sent to jail for his dc case meaning he will be in jail except for his va trial in july until september . at the earliest.
6/15/2018 12:08 PM
Giuliani demands Mueller suspend Russia probe

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/rudy-giuliani-robert-mueller-ig-report/index.html
6/15/2018 12:12 PM
like anything Giuliani says is worth paying attention to.
6/15/2018 12:52 PM
To be fair both sides need to be represented.
6/15/2018 1:14 PM
Are there two Paul Manaforts? Is this guy being sent to the slammer the same Paul Manafort who ran Trump's campaign for five months, and continued to advise Trump through the presidential transition? Or is it a different Paul Manafort? Because Trump was talking about a Paul Manafort the other day and he said that Paul Manafort "had nothing to do with our campaign." Gotta be two different guys, right? Even Trump wouldn't lie that blatantly.
6/15/2018 1:16 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 6/15/2018 12:52:00 PM (view original):
like anything Giuliani says is worth paying attention to.
Rudy is going to be in big trouble when it comes out he lied about leaks from the New York FBI office, better known as Trumpland. The IG report was a nothing burger of the biggest degree.
6/15/2018 1:22 PM
that is a very big under the radar story.
i can see him getting sued for defamation somewhere down the line also.
6/15/2018 1:30 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
As with Trump, there's a good chance Rudy will be using the diminished capacity defense somewhere down the line. He comes off as deranged/senile every time I hear him speak.

6/15/2018 1:40 PM
Good summary here of the IG report and the fallout from it.

During an appearance on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show on Thursday night, Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump’s legal adviser and cable-news frontman, called on the Justice Department to suspend the special counsel, Robert Mueller, as early as Friday. Giuliani didn’t say whether he had cleared this demand with Trump, but it seems unlikely that he would say such a thing without getting at least some direction, or encouragement, from the President.

In any case, Giuliani’s statement indicates that a moment of crisis may be at hand. For months now, Trump’s closest allies on Capitol Hill and in the news media have been preparing to use a report by Michael Horowitz, the inspector general of the Justice Department, about the F.B.I.’s handling of the 2016 Hillary Clinton e-mail inquiry, as a pretext to go after, and, if possible, derail the Mueller investigation. Just hours after the report was released, Giuliani went on the attack. “I believe Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein have a chance to redeem themselves, and that chance comes about tomorrow,” he told Hannity. “Tomorrow, Mueller should be suspended and honest people should be brought in, impartial people, to investigate these people like Strzok. Strzok should be in jail by the end of next week.”

Strzok is a senior F.B.I. agent who worked on the Clinton e-mail case and the investigation into possible ties between Russia and the Trump campaign. In recent months, Trump and his supporters have seized on some text messages that Strzok sent, in 2016, to Lisa Page, a former employee of the bureau, with whom he was having an affair, as evidence of a “deep state” conspiracy against the President. The inspector general’s report revealed more of these Strzok-Page exchanges, including one, from August of 2016, in which Page said of Trump, he’s “not ever going to become President, right? Right?” Strzok replied, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

Clearly, Strzok didn’t like Trump, and when the existence of the texts became public, last year, Mueller removed him from his team. The lengthy inspector general’s report, most of which is devoted to other matters, says that the Strzok-Page texts “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.” Crucially, however, the report also includes some detailed exculpatory remarks about the duo. (Page resigned from the F.B.I., last month. Strzok is still employed by the agency, but he is facing an internal disciplinary process.)

At one point, the report says, “Our review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence directly connecting the political views these employees expressed in their text messages and instant messages to the investigative decisions we reviewed.” Elsewhere, the report states, in reference to the Clinton e-mail investigation, “We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures than did others.”

This finding jibed with the report’s over-all findings. Although the report was highly critical of James Comey, the former director of the F.B.I., for the manner in which he announced that the Clinton e-mail investigation had ended, and later, announced that it had been reopened, it concluded that the investigation itself was carried out professionally and free of political bias. Rather than focussing on that conclusion, which runs counter to what Trump has been saying for almost two years, the President’s supporters, with Giuliani in the lead, are cherry-picking from the report to try to scuttle the Mueller investigation, which didn’t even start until May of 2017, after Trump had fired Comey.

During his interview with Hannity, Giuliani asked how the F.B.I.’s Trump-Russia investigation began, in 2016. Then he answered his own question, by referring to Strzok and Page and claiming, “These people fixed it.” He also said that the Justice Department, once it had suspended Mueller, should “throw out all the people who have been involved in the phony Trump investigation and bring in honest F.B.I. agents from the New York office, who I can trust implicitly. And they should turn their attention to Comey, Strzok, Page.”

To be sure, Giuliani is a loudmouth, and in recent weeks he’s uttered many provocative statements. But in calling on the Justice Department to suspend Mueller and dismantle his investigation, he went beyond anything he has said before. The question now is whether senior G.O.P. politicians, particularly Republican leaders on Capitol Hill, will stand up for Mueller in the face of these incendiary attacks. Unless they do, Trump may well be encouraged to go ahead and order the suspension or firing of Mueller—a course of action that he has clearly been itching to follow for a long time. On Friday morning, he tweeted, “FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who headed the Clinton & Russia investigations, texted to his lover Lisa Page, in the IG Report, that ‘we’ll stop’ candidate Trump from becoming President. Doesn’t get any lower than that!”

So is Trump going to follow through on what Giuliani's calling for here? I don't believe Sessions and Rosenstein will do anything, so it'd have to be Trump who gets the ball rolling. I think Rudy wants him to do it.

6/15/2018 2:21 PM
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31892/comey-says-inspector-general-report-vindicates-him-ben-shapiro
6/15/2018 2:29 PM
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31896/huge-report-says-us-will-withdraw-un-human-rights-hank-berrien




The Human Rights Council has no problem inviting a man cited as one of the most brutal men in the world address it, and a look at the new members inaugurated in 2017 into the Council shows a list of some of the most anti-human rights governments in existence.



President George W. Bush boycotted the Council for three years before Barack Obama rejoined it in 2009. Last month, the notoriously anti-Israel Council voted to accuse Israel of excessive use of force. The United States and Australia were the only two members of the 47-member body to vote against the resolution.

6/15/2018 2:34 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 6/15/2018 2:35:00 PM (view original):
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31896/huge-report-says-us-will-withdraw-un-human-rights-hank-berrien




The Human Rights Council has no problem inviting a man cited as one of the most brutal men in the world address it, and a look at the new members inaugurated in 2017 into the Council shows a list of some of the most anti-human rights governments in existence.



President George W. Bush boycotted the Council for three years before Barack Obama rejoined it in 2009. Last month, the notoriously anti-Israel Council voted to accuse Israel of excessive use of force. The United States and Australia were the only two members of the 47-member body to vote against the resolution.

this is off topic...out of courtesy i did not redline it...off topic submissions will be redlined.
6/15/2018 3:38 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4...14 Next ▸
THEMUELLER CHRONICLES INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.