Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):
Your daughter plays LAX? Maybe you don’t have to worry about her dating dudes.

LAX is not softball. Nice try though. I am sure she ll date as many dudes as your sons....

I have one of each. They can date whoever they want. Liberal. Conservative. Male. Female. I don’t care, as long as they treat each other well.

Better yet, why don't you get them to date the same bipolar person, who thinks he's a male one day and a female the next?

The vast majority of the people working in the DOJ/FBI are conservative. Including Mueller.

Strzok’s comment regarding stopping Trump was an expression of outrage after Trump denigrated a gold-star family.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:55:00 PM (view original):
The vast majority of the people working in the DOJ/FBI are conservative. Including Mueller.

Strzok’s comment regarding stopping Trump was an expression of outrage after Trump denigrated a gold-star family.

OK, are you now an expert on FBI testimony? LOL.

Man you are really full of yourself. Would love to see how you fare in an MMA cage vs. moi. I'd give $5k to your choice of charity.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 1:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 1:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 1:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:51:00 PM (view original):
I’m ignoring your Russia question because I already posted the GOP-led Senate intelligence committee report saying that Russia interfered in the election to benefit Trump. You ignored that.

The GOP-authored report found “no evidence” that the Trump campaign “colluded, coordinated or conspired with Russia.”

Yeah. That’s not what I said. I said Russia helped Trump.

Aside from that we don’t know that they colluded. But think about it, we know for a fact that Russia was trying to help Trump win. We also know for a fact, thanks to Dummy Jr., that the campaign was open to receiving help. So, what was stopping them from colluding?

You said the release of emails caused HRC to lose votes. I wanted to know how? What was released in those emails that helped her lose votes? Did Russia really expose her as a flawed candidate?

Was it Russia's fault that:

1. Benghazi happened on her watch.
2. Her husband is considered a creep by many.
3. She called DJT supporters a basket of deplorables and irredeemables?
4. She lost the debates (subjective) but many thought Trump looked better.
5. Many in her party preferred Sanders over her.
6. Comey publicly reopened the investigation into her private server.
7. Huma's husband was a creep.
8. She did not campaign in Michigan.
9. She was laissez faire on the Syrian migration to the US.
10. Her Foundation was at best questionable.

Come on man. Blaming Russia for the loss is just sour grapes.

Please explain again what specifically Russia did to help Trump take votes from Clinton? Let's say they did collude and Putin says I want you to win and Trump says, thanks. What then? Did Russia pay voters? Did they change votes via cyber terror? What did they specifically do?

They specifically used a mis/dis information campaign against the American people in targeted states. Cambridge Analytics is at the heart of it and is being investigated not only by us, but by England in the Brexit campaign. If you remember, the raid on Cambridge is one of the first pieces of the whole puzzle to be put together.


It will all be spelled out when Mueller's final report comes down. It will be interesting to see if there was any attempted influence on the "Trumplandia" FBI office in NY, where the forced re-opening of the non-story Hillary emails happened 11 days before the election.

Dumb it down for me since you and BL think I am dumb.

I am Mike Smith and I live in Harrisburg, PA. I am undecided. What did Russia just do to make me vote for Trump over Clinton? Did they bribe me? Did they change my vote in the machine when I circled HRC it moved to DJT? The negative info. on HRC was already there. So now Putin says to Trump, I will help you win. Trump says. Thanks. They COLLUDE!!!!

Now what happens? I mean if you tell me that Putin changed votes and Trump knew about it he should be in jail. If you tell me Putin bribed swing voters in swing states and Trump knew, he should be in jail. But I just don't follow the granular logic of what Russia actually did to cause HRC to lose votes and for DJT to win votes?

Do you at least see where I am coming from here?

Why was Russia shopping dirt on Clinton and why was Trump's campaign interested in getting said dirt if there was no benefit to it?

IDK - This is what bothers me. How does colluding help anything? What can Russia do to influence US votes?

The bigger issue is and I didn't even know about it, is that the DNC colluded vs. Sanders? Is that true?

To answer your second question, yes.

Does it bother you?

A little. If the process were actually neutral (and BL is right that it doesn't have to be) then HRC MIGHT not have won the primary. And I think Sanders beats Trump if he wins the primaries.

You don't think the process should be neutral? Really? Why?

I think it should be. But in the current system it doesn't have to be.

Well then the DNC should not complain when people don't vote. Right? LOL

Sally thinks her vote should count. DNC says they know better than Sally does how she should vote. Sally says I'll stay home thanks. GOP wins election.

Thanks for highlighting the damage done by the email leaks. I knew you’d get it eventually.

Sally’s primary vote did count (Bernie lost by a lot) but the perception that the DNC favored Clinton damaged Clinton in the general.

Posted by all3 on 7/16/2018 2:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):
Your daughter plays LAX? Maybe you don’t have to worry about her dating dudes.

LAX is not softball. Nice try though. I am sure she ll date as many dudes as your sons....

I have one of each. They can date whoever they want. Liberal. Conservative. Male. Female. I don’t care, as long as they treat each other well.

Better yet, why don't you get them to date the same bipolar person, who thinks he's a male one day and a female the next?

Just keep them away from my kids. Far far far far far far far away.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Obviously a ton of people thought it was going to influence something.....people that do this **** for a living. Whatever the reason, it's against the law.

I get it. I am just curious as to how? I logically cannot see it. I must know more!!!

Obviously the targets would be swing states. Maybe someone can write a book about it sometime? Derschewitz (sp??) thinks that this is not impeachable. IDK.

I do know this. Whatever Mueller comes back with, 50% of the country will like and 50% will hate.

But you will respect Mueller's authority on this, no? I just want to make that clear so there are no backsies when he releases his report.

How can I respect something I have yet to read. After the Stztrok (sp?) testimony I honestly no longer trust Washington or the FBI. Do you buy that he was unbiased? Things are so heated now I don't think anyone is unbiased.

If Mueller finds nothing then I probably won't believe him. If he finds that Trump and Putin are lovers, I will. No one would make that up, LOL.

As a sidebar. I thought that report on deflating footballs and TB was total BS. So I am a skeptic. I actually think Trump has been tougher on Russia than Obama was. He killed 200+ mercenaries in Syria, he armed Ukraine, he imposed sanctions on Iran, he is pushing on China and N. Korea. Why would Russia want him over HRC? Maybe to divide the country? I don't get it.

It's really pretty simple Boris. Putin never dreamed Trump would actually win (who did, really?? not very many, anywhere!), so
the intent was to just damage HRC, weaken Her (because Putin figured she'd be the next prez.), f.. around with the election (using social media, etc) and seek to divide the American people and damage our Union. No big mystery.

As I said earlier, we're dumb. The sickness has made us blind. Putin succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.
We no longer even recognize truth.
Pay no attention to what you know and heed............ the piper calls.
He says Fake News. I'm awesome, doing a great job, it's all because of Me,
Heil On.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:55:00 PM (view original):
The vast majority of the people working in the DOJ/FBI are conservative. Including Mueller.

Strzok’s comment regarding stopping Trump was an expression of outrage after Trump denigrated a gold-star family.

OK, are you now an expert on FBI testimony? LOL.

Man you are really full of yourself. Would love to see how you fare in an MMA cage vs. moi. I'd give $5k to your choice of charity.

Expert? All I had to do was listen to him talk. That’s what Strzok testified to. Unless you think he was lying under oath.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 1:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 1:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 1:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:51:00 PM (view original):
I’m ignoring your Russia question because I already posted the GOP-led Senate intelligence committee report saying that Russia interfered in the election to benefit Trump. You ignored that.

The GOP-authored report found “no evidence” that the Trump campaign “colluded, coordinated or conspired with Russia.”

Yeah. That’s not what I said. I said Russia helped Trump.

Aside from that we don’t know that they colluded. But think about it, we know for a fact that Russia was trying to help Trump win. We also know for a fact, thanks to Dummy Jr., that the campaign was open to receiving help. So, what was stopping them from colluding?

You said the release of emails caused HRC to lose votes. I wanted to know how? What was released in those emails that helped her lose votes? Did Russia really expose her as a flawed candidate?

Was it Russia's fault that:

1. Benghazi happened on her watch.
2. Her husband is considered a creep by many.
3. She called DJT supporters a basket of deplorables and irredeemables?
4. She lost the debates (subjective) but many thought Trump looked better.
5. Many in her party preferred Sanders over her.
6. Comey publicly reopened the investigation into her private server.
7. Huma's husband was a creep.
8. She did not campaign in Michigan.
9. She was laissez faire on the Syrian migration to the US.
10. Her Foundation was at best questionable.

Come on man. Blaming Russia for the loss is just sour grapes.

Please explain again what specifically Russia did to help Trump take votes from Clinton? Let's say they did collude and Putin says I want you to win and Trump says, thanks. What then? Did Russia pay voters? Did they change votes via cyber terror? What did they specifically do?

They specifically used a mis/dis information campaign against the American people in targeted states. Cambridge Analytics is at the heart of it and is being investigated not only by us, but by England in the Brexit campaign. If you remember, the raid on Cambridge is one of the first pieces of the whole puzzle to be put together.


It will all be spelled out when Mueller's final report comes down. It will be interesting to see if there was any attempted influence on the "Trumplandia" FBI office in NY, where the forced re-opening of the non-story Hillary emails happened 11 days before the election.

Dumb it down for me since you and BL think I am dumb.

I am Mike Smith and I live in Harrisburg, PA. I am undecided. What did Russia just do to make me vote for Trump over Clinton? Did they bribe me? Did they change my vote in the machine when I circled HRC it moved to DJT? The negative info. on HRC was already there. So now Putin says to Trump, I will help you win. Trump says. Thanks. They COLLUDE!!!!

Now what happens? I mean if you tell me that Putin changed votes and Trump knew about it he should be in jail. If you tell me Putin bribed swing voters in swing states and Trump knew, he should be in jail. But I just don't follow the granular logic of what Russia actually did to cause HRC to lose votes and for DJT to win votes?

Do you at least see where I am coming from here?

Why was Russia shopping dirt on Clinton and why was Trump's campaign interested in getting said dirt if there was no benefit to it?

IDK - This is what bothers me. How does colluding help anything? What can Russia do to influence US votes?

The bigger issue is and I didn't even know about it, is that the DNC colluded vs. Sanders? Is that true?

To answer your second question, yes.

Does it bother you?

A little. If the process were actually neutral (and BL is right that it doesn't have to be) then HRC MIGHT not have won the primary. And I think Sanders beats Trump if he wins the primaries.

You don't think the process should be neutral? Really? Why?

I think it should be. But in the current system it doesn't have to be.

Well then the DNC should not complain when people don't vote. Right? LOL

Sally thinks her vote should count. DNC says they know better than Sally does how she should vote. Sally says I'll stay home thanks. GOP wins election.

Thanks for highlighting the damage done by the email leaks. I knew you’d get it eventually.

Sally’s primary vote did count (Bernie lost by a lot) but the perception that the DNC favored Clinton damaged Clinton in the general.

I never said that. Man you like to reach. You are stating that the DNC picks what candidate they choose via the super delegates. Correct? Sally does not like that. Sally knows this because she can see the super delegates votes. She does not need Russia for that.

DNC's perception of favoring Clinton was the least of Clinton's flaws.

When your kids lose in sports, do you blame the Russians too?

Posted by laramiebob on 7/16/2018 2:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Obviously a ton of people thought it was going to influence something.....people that do this **** for a living. Whatever the reason, it's against the law.

I get it. I am just curious as to how? I logically cannot see it. I must know more!!!

Obviously the targets would be swing states. Maybe someone can write a book about it sometime? Derschewitz (sp??) thinks that this is not impeachable. IDK.

I do know this. Whatever Mueller comes back with, 50% of the country will like and 50% will hate.

But you will respect Mueller's authority on this, no? I just want to make that clear so there are no backsies when he releases his report.

How can I respect something I have yet to read. After the Stztrok (sp?) testimony I honestly no longer trust Washington or the FBI. Do you buy that he was unbiased? Things are so heated now I don't think anyone is unbiased.

If Mueller finds nothing then I probably won't believe him. If he finds that Trump and Putin are lovers, I will. No one would make that up, LOL.

As a sidebar. I thought that report on deflating footballs and TB was total BS. So I am a skeptic. I actually think Trump has been tougher on Russia than Obama was. He killed 200+ mercenaries in Syria, he armed Ukraine, he imposed sanctions on Iran, he is pushing on China and N. Korea. Why would Russia want him over HRC? Maybe to divide the country? I don't get it.

It's really pretty simple Boris. Putin never dreamed Trump would actually win (who did, really?? not very money, anywhere!), so
the intent was to just damage HRC, weaken Her (because Putin figured she'd be the next prez.), f.. around with the election (using social media, etc) and seek to divide the American people and damage our Union. No big mystery.

As I said earlier, we're dumb. The sickness has made us blind. Putin succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.
We no longer even recognize truth.
Pay no attention to what you know and heed............ the piper calls.
He says Fake News. I'm awesome, doing a great job, it's all because of Me,
Heil On.

That I can see! Russia wanted to damage Clinton only to find that Clinton was already so damaged there was no need for them to interfere. LOL.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:55:00 PM (view original):
The vast majority of the people working in the DOJ/FBI are conservative. Including Mueller.

Strzok’s comment regarding stopping Trump was an expression of outrage after Trump denigrated a gold-star family.

OK, are you now an expert on FBI testimony? LOL.

Man you are really full of yourself. Would love to see how you fare in an MMA cage vs. moi. I'd give $5k to your choice of charity.

Expert? All I had to do was listen to him talk. That’s what Strzok testified to. Unless you think he was lying under oath.

I 100% think he was lying under oath. He never thought DJT would win so he talked trash. Ooooops. He said Trump should lose 100mil to zero. LOL.

Nah he was not biased. Man you are gullible.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:55:00 PM (view original):
The vast majority of the people working in the DOJ/FBI are conservative. Including Mueller.

Strzok’s comment regarding stopping Trump was an expression of outrage after Trump denigrated a gold-star family.

OK, are you now an expert on FBI testimony? LOL.

Man you are really full of yourself. Would love to see how you fare in an MMA cage vs. moi. I'd give $5k to your choice of charity.

Expert? All I had to do was listen to him talk. That’s what Strzok testified to. Unless you think he was lying under oath.

I 100% think he was lying under oath. He never thought DJT would win so he talked trash. Ooooops. He said Trump should lose 100mil to zero. LOL.

Nah he was not biased. Man you are gullible.

So you’re the one claiming to be an expert on testimony?

Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:55:00 PM (view original):
The vast majority of the people working in the DOJ/FBI are conservative. Including Mueller.

Strzok’s comment regarding stopping Trump was an expression of outrage after Trump denigrated a gold-star family.

OK, are you now an expert on FBI testimony? LOL.

Man you are really full of yourself. Would love to see how you fare in an MMA cage vs. moi. I'd give $5k to your choice of charity.

He said so himself. Lol.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 1:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 1:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 1:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:51:00 PM (view original):
I’m ignoring your Russia question because I already posted the GOP-led Senate intelligence committee report saying that Russia interfered in the election to benefit Trump. You ignored that.

The GOP-authored report found “no evidence” that the Trump campaign “colluded, coordinated or conspired with Russia.”

Yeah. That’s not what I said. I said Russia helped Trump.

Aside from that we don’t know that they colluded. But think about it, we know for a fact that Russia was trying to help Trump win. We also know for a fact, thanks to Dummy Jr., that the campaign was open to receiving help. So, what was stopping them from colluding?

You said the release of emails caused HRC to lose votes. I wanted to know how? What was released in those emails that helped her lose votes? Did Russia really expose her as a flawed candidate?

Was it Russia's fault that:

1. Benghazi happened on her watch.
2. Her husband is considered a creep by many.
3. She called DJT supporters a basket of deplorables and irredeemables?
4. She lost the debates (subjective) but many thought Trump looked better.
5. Many in her party preferred Sanders over her.
6. Comey publicly reopened the investigation into her private server.
7. Huma's husband was a creep.
8. She did not campaign in Michigan.
9. She was laissez faire on the Syrian migration to the US.
10. Her Foundation was at best questionable.

Come on man. Blaming Russia for the loss is just sour grapes.

Please explain again what specifically Russia did to help Trump take votes from Clinton? Let's say they did collude and Putin says I want you to win and Trump says, thanks. What then? Did Russia pay voters? Did they change votes via cyber terror? What did they specifically do?

They specifically used a mis/dis information campaign against the American people in targeted states. Cambridge Analytics is at the heart of it and is being investigated not only by us, but by England in the Brexit campaign. If you remember, the raid on Cambridge is one of the first pieces of the whole puzzle to be put together.


It will all be spelled out when Mueller's final report comes down. It will be interesting to see if there was any attempted influence on the "Trumplandia" FBI office in NY, where the forced re-opening of the non-story Hillary emails happened 11 days before the election.

Dumb it down for me since you and BL think I am dumb.

I am Mike Smith and I live in Harrisburg, PA. I am undecided. What did Russia just do to make me vote for Trump over Clinton? Did they bribe me? Did they change my vote in the machine when I circled HRC it moved to DJT? The negative info. on HRC was already there. So now Putin says to Trump, I will help you win. Trump says. Thanks. They COLLUDE!!!!

Now what happens? I mean if you tell me that Putin changed votes and Trump knew about it he should be in jail. If you tell me Putin bribed swing voters in swing states and Trump knew, he should be in jail. But I just don't follow the granular logic of what Russia actually did to cause HRC to lose votes and for DJT to win votes?

Do you at least see where I am coming from here?

Why was Russia shopping dirt on Clinton and why was Trump's campaign interested in getting said dirt if there was no benefit to it?

IDK - This is what bothers me. How does colluding help anything? What can Russia do to influence US votes?

The bigger issue is and I didn't even know about it, is that the DNC colluded vs. Sanders? Is that true?

To answer your second question, yes.

Does it bother you?

A little. If the process were actually neutral (and BL is right that it doesn't have to be) then HRC MIGHT not have won the primary. And I think Sanders beats Trump if he wins the primaries.

You don't think the process should be neutral? Really? Why?

I think it should be. But in the current system it doesn't have to be.

Well then the DNC should not complain when people don't vote. Right? LOL

Sally thinks her vote should count. DNC says they know better than Sally does how she should vote. Sally says I'll stay home thanks. GOP wins election.

Now you're getting it!

exactly

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 2:55:00 PM (view original):
The vast majority of the people working in the DOJ/FBI are conservative. Including Mueller.

Strzok’s comment regarding stopping Trump was an expression of outrage after Trump denigrated a gold-star family.

OK, are you now an expert on FBI testimony? LOL.

Man you are really full of yourself. Would love to see how you fare in an MMA cage vs. moi. I'd give $5k to your choice of charity.

Expert? All I had to do was listen to him talk. That’s what Strzok testified to. Unless you think he was lying under oath.

I 100% think he was lying under oath. He never thought DJT would win so he talked trash. Ooooops. He said Trump should lose 100mil to zero. LOL.

Nah he was not biased. Man you are gullible.

So you’re the one claiming to be an expert on testimony?

I just speak English. If I think the Pats will beat the Rams 100 - 0...I am likely favoring the Pats in a biased fashion. LOL. Duh.

He was talking about impeaching Trump six days before conducting one interview. I am OK with him being biased but him saying he wasn't makes him a liar liar pants on fire.