TRUMP: Best President Ever (New and Improved!) Topic

To Taint: That was obvious to anyone who saw the super delegates.
7/16/2018 3:10 PM
So whens Trump going to testify under oath?

thats right he wont.

his team knows he is incapable of not lying, even under oath.
7/16/2018 3:11 PM
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:11:00 PM (view original):
So whens Trump going to testify under oath?

thats right he wont.

his team knows he is incapable of not lying, even under oath.
IDK? When his attorneys tell him to? They think he is testifying to a biased person or people.

Do you think Pete S. was not biased? You're biased. I am biased. He was certainly biased. Come on man. Bad Luck is biased too. Toward Brad Radke. He he
7/16/2018 3:15 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
7/16/2018 3:17 PM
Ridiculous. Ludicrous. ******* straight up retarded.

an all-time apoligist.

straight up treason on stage today

history is going to be rough on the Trump Trainers.
7/16/2018 3:18 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?
7/16/2018 3:19 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
He never thought Trump would win. I am OK with him having bias but don't lie and say you didn't. He said he didn't. LOL. He seemed to close the HRC investigation fairly rapidly though. Ha ha ha. That man is one conniving dude. That's fine just say as much.

"I hated Trump. I thought he would be an awful candidate and I am shocked he won. Still I did my job and did not have any bias toward the Clinton or Trump investigations"...seems simple enough.

If he was doing his job and he was not biased then why did Mueller drop him?
7/16/2018 3:20 PM
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?
Himself and the Bureau
7/16/2018 3:21 PM
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:18:00 PM (view original):
Ridiculous. Ludicrous. ******* straight up retarded.

an all-time apoligist.

straight up treason on stage today

history is going to be rough on the Trump Trainers.
Hey hey hey hey!! Easy there big guy. Think of Punta Cana.
7/16/2018 3:21 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?
Himself and the Bureau
None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT
7/16/2018 3:22 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:20:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
He never thought Trump would win. I am OK with him having bias but don't lie and say you didn't. He said he didn't. LOL. He seemed to close the HRC investigation fairly rapidly though. Ha ha ha. That man is one conniving dude. That's fine just say as much.

"I hated Trump. I thought he would be an awful candidate and I am shocked he won. Still I did my job and did not have any bias toward the Clinton or Trump investigations"...seems simple enough.

If he was doing his job and he was not biased then why did Mueller drop him?
He said he didn’t let his personal opinions impact his work.
7/16/2018 3:23 PM
If PS wanted to damage the Trump campaign and waS as dirty as people say, he would have leaked the Trump/Russia investigation.
7/16/2018 3:24 PM
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?
Himself and the Bureau
None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT

In one exchange Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."

LOL - But he was not biased.





And particularly damaging was the fact that, according to unnamed US officials, Strzok played a role in changing former FBI Director James Comey's wording regarding how she handled classified information from "gross negligence" to the noncriminal "extremely careless."


7/16/2018 3:25 PM
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?
Himself and the Bureau
None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT
This 100%
7/16/2018 3:25 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:20:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
He never thought Trump would win. I am OK with him having bias but don't lie and say you didn't. He said he didn't. LOL. He seemed to close the HRC investigation fairly rapidly though. Ha ha ha. That man is one conniving dude. That's fine just say as much.

"I hated Trump. I thought he would be an awful candidate and I am shocked he won. Still I did my job and did not have any bias toward the Clinton or Trump investigations"...seems simple enough.

If he was doing his job and he was not biased then why did Mueller drop him?
He said he didn’t let his personal opinions impact his work.
FROM CNN:




If Strzok were subpoenaed to testify before a jury in an ordinary criminal case, his actions would doom the case. Attorneys who try cases for a living as I do would view Strzok's texts and testimony as a gold mine and a mother lode of cross-examination material.




Regardless of the IG's findings, which are only his personal opinion, objective jurors would be stunned by such an obviously biased investigator being employed by the FBI in such a lofty investigative position. Strzok would insert reasonable doubt into any criminal case where he appeared as a prosecution witness.



Some may assume that if Strzok really wanted to sabotage the election of Trump all he had to do was leak the fact that the FBI was investigating Trump. But that logic doesn't fly. Strzok would have feared loss of his job or possible criminal prosecution for such a leak -- particularly if classified information were involved. The true test of Strzok's biases and intentions can be found in his malicious text messages.




The biggest tragedy of all is that the conduct of Strzok, Page and ultimately Comey may well have been far more damaging than any covert actions against the United States by the Russians. They have destroyed the institutional credibility of a sacred American institution, the FBI.
7/16/2018 3:26 PM
◂ Prev 1...385|386|387|388|389...960 Next ▸
TRUMP: Best President Ever (New and Improved!) Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.