24 years of this ****.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 2:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 2:01:00 PM (view original):
Obviously a ton of people thought it was going to influence something.....people that do this **** for a living. Whatever the reason, it's against the law.

I get it. I am just curious as to how? I logically cannot see it. I must know more!!!

Obviously the targets would be swing states. Maybe someone can write a book about it sometime? Derschewitz (sp??) thinks that this is not impeachable. IDK.

I do know this. Whatever Mueller comes back with, 50% of the country will like and 50% will hate.

But you will respect Mueller's authority on this, no? I just want to make that clear so there are no backsies when he releases his report.

How can I respect something I have yet to read. After the Stztrok (sp?) testimony I honestly no longer trust Washington or the FBI. Do you buy that he was unbiased? Things are so heated now I don't think anyone is unbiased.

If Mueller finds nothing then I probably won't believe him. If he finds that Trump and Putin are lovers, I will. No one would make that up, LOL.

As a sidebar. I thought that report on deflating footballs and TB was total BS. So I am a skeptic. I actually think Trump has been tougher on Russia than Obama was. He killed 200+ mercenaries in Syria, he armed Ukraine, he imposed sanctions on Iran, he is pushing on China and N. Korea. Why would Russia want him over HRC? Maybe to divide the country? I don't get it.

Mueller is biased. Everyone is. He also happens to be a conservative. And he is a good, honest man.

You don't know Mueller. You have no idea if he is good or honest. I am sure in 1985 they said the same thing about Bill Cosby. Conservatives are not Trump supporters necessarily. Not everyone is biased but most people are for sure. If that Stzork thing did not irritate you then you are not human.

Exactly. We don't know Mueller. For all we know he supports Trump.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?

Himself and the Bureau

None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT

In one exchange Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."

LOL - But he was not biased.





And particularly damaging was the fact that, according to unnamed US officials, Strzok played a role in changing former FBI Director James Comey's wording regarding how she handled classified information from "gross negligence" to the noncriminal "extremely careless."

Talk about refusing to answer questions. Yes. He was biased. Everyone is. He didn't let that impact his work.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 5:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 5:47:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 5:12:00 PM (view original):
Jesus. Even republicans are accusing Trump of treason after that embarrassment of a press conference.

Jesus is accusing Trump? What?

LOL

bad luck is so butt hurt. Do you explain winning and losing to your kids or are you part of the everyone gets a trophy crowd?

Oh yeah, I forgot you can’t actually read English.

Answer the question.

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 6:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?

Himself and the Bureau

None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT

In one exchange Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."

LOL - But he was not biased.





And particularly damaging was the fact that, according to unnamed US officials, Strzok played a role in changing former FBI Director James Comey's wording regarding how she handled classified information from "gross negligence" to the noncriminal "extremely careless."

Talk about refusing to answer questions. Yes. He was biased. Everyone is. He didn't let that impact his work.

OK, tangy. Go back to your safe space.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

He never thought Trump would win. I am OK with him having bias but don't lie and say you didn't. He said he didn't. LOL. He seemed to close the HRC investigation fairly rapidly though. Ha ha ha. That man is one conniving dude. That's fine just say as much.

"I hated Trump. I thought he would be an awful candidate and I am shocked he won. Still I did my job and did not have any bias toward the Clinton or Trump investigations"...seems simple enough.

If he was doing his job and he was not biased then why did Mueller drop him?

He said he didn’t let his personal opinions impact his work.

Lied again. LMAO.

But, of course, we now know the opinion of one agent, and he happens to be the one who substituted "extremely careless" for "gross negligence," a usage that might have suggested to some that Clinton had violated US laws in her handling of classified email materials. That agent, Strzok, despised Trump.

I mean, he isn't wrong though. I would describe it as extremely careless. But as John Oliver put it, the more you look into the emails the less of a story it becomes. That's why the big investigations of them come up with nothing.

Don't get me wrong, though. It was still extremely careless and tarnishes her reputation greatly.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 6:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.

Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.

Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?

Himself and the Bureau

None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT

In one exchange Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."

LOL - But he was not biased.





And particularly damaging was the fact that, according to unnamed US officials, Strzok played a role in changing former FBI Director James Comey's wording regarding how she handled classified information from "gross negligence" to the noncriminal "extremely careless."

Talk about refusing to answer questions. Yes. He was biased. Everyone is. He didn't let that impact his work.

OK, tangy. Go back to your safe space.

I got no safe space. I don't live in ******* California like BL. I live in Kansas. CON COUNTRY!

You and BL can keep going at it from your richy big cities.

I will stay back here with my working class country people.

I am the outsider.

Here is how this debate went:
CCCP: He's biased.
BL: Yes, but he clearly didn't let that impact his work.
CCCP: Well, if he had done that, he would have gotten fired, so HE'S BIASED.
BL: *Sigh*

The proof is in the pudding. Strzok clearly didn't do anything pre-election to favor Hillary. And yes, if he had no conviction for the law and everyone operated by their own political agendas he would have done more to favor Hillary. But the FBI is actually credible, and they are not deep state, SO THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN. Your only good argument is that Strzok changed the classification of the emails, but that's a big nothingburger to me. I don't think that was politically charged. You can argue right or wrong all you want, but an argument can certainly be made that he was right to change it.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 5:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 5:47:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 5:12:00 PM (view original):
Jesus. Even republicans are accusing Trump of treason after that embarrassment of a press conference.

Jesus is accusing Trump? What?

LOL

bad luck is so butt hurt. Do you explain winning and losing to your kids or are you part of the everyone gets a trophy crowd?

Oh yeah, I forgot you can’t actually read English.

Answer the question.

Really, do I have to teach you everything about the English language?

Your post was a great example of a rhetorical question. You were trying to prove a point, you weren’t expecting anyone to actually answer it.

I’m assuming Russia has an equivalent, not sure what it’s called though. This must be a good day for you, seeing an American President fellate the Russian President in front of the entire world.

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:25:00 PM (view original):
Your opinion is irrelevant just as mine was when I didn't have kids. I realized that quickly after I had them. Of course in the end they will date whomever they want but generally girls gravitate toward dating people who closest resemble how their dads acted and such. Look it up.

Boys are more of rebels. I was too. I know.

My daughter may date when I'm dead and gone, not a second before.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):
Your daughter plays LAX? Maybe you don’t have to worry about her dating dudes.

Too far!

The libs will explain exactly what Trump did and why we should all be ******. Soon. Shortly. Eventually.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 1:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 1:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 12:51:00 PM (view original):
I’m ignoring your Russia question because I already posted the GOP-led Senate intelligence committee report saying that Russia interfered in the election to benefit Trump. You ignored that.

The GOP-authored report found “no evidence” that the Trump campaign “colluded, coordinated or conspired with Russia.”

Yeah. That’s not what I said. I said Russia helped Trump.

Aside from that we don’t know that they colluded. But think about it, we know for a fact that Russia was trying to help Trump win. We also know for a fact, thanks to Dummy Jr., that the campaign was open to receiving help. So, what was stopping them from colluding?

I don't think Putin cared about Trump winning. Putin wanted to cause chaos. Hillary held a large advantage in the polls. He saw a close race as an opportunity to cause chaos. Had Trump held a large lead, I believe he would have helped Hillary. This isn't the first country that Russia has done this to. They need to be stopped.

Saying that, Hillary was an easy target. She came with so much baggage for Putin to expose.

We are all ignoring you, Doug. Your intellect is just too great for us to comprehend. Now, please post 150000000 pages of Rush Limbaugh spouting conservative nutjob propaganda again. Thanks!