Posted by Tucker T's on 8/2/2018 2:08:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Tucker T's on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):


The Only Evidence . . .

this is the part where you mention Uranium One.

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Tucker T's on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):


The Only Evidence . . .

this is the part where you mention Uranium One.

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 12:57:00 PM (view original):
Treason is a crime. If it can be proven that the Russian government interfered in the presidential election, giving aid to a foreign adversary is treason. I'm not sure it matters whether he knew, especially if it can be proven that members of his campaign participated.

that said, we only have the word of the intelligence community as "evidence." that's not good enough for me. it's funny how everyone thinks they know the result of the probe before it is over. I feel like The Atlantic might know more than Mueller at this point.

I think the financial crimes end up being Trump's downfall. Conspiracy charges around the Russia stuff would be bad, but that's tough to prove absent direct evidence.

Money laundering? Tax evasion? Those are much easier to prove.

what financial crimes? the President hasn't been charged with any.

The President hasn’t been charged with anything.

this is true. he's innocent until proven guilty. that's not to say there won't be something legitimate, but there is no evidence of financial crimes by this administration related to any involvement with Russia.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/2/2018 2:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 12:44:00 PM (view original):
1973: “I am not a crook”

2018: “Collusion is not a crime”

Collusion is not crime. Dumbass. Duh.

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 2:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Tucker T's on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):


The Only Evidence . . .

this is the part where you mention Uranium One.

Wait what? Uranium one isn't a scandal.

The State Department couldn't even veto the deal. Unless you think Clinton led a conspiracy of 9 Federal agencies to sign off on the deal.

It's the dumbest ******* non-scandal since fast and furious.

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 2:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 12:57:00 PM (view original):
Treason is a crime. If it can be proven that the Russian government interfered in the presidential election, giving aid to a foreign adversary is treason. I'm not sure it matters whether he knew, especially if it can be proven that members of his campaign participated.

that said, we only have the word of the intelligence community as "evidence." that's not good enough for me. it's funny how everyone thinks they know the result of the probe before it is over. I feel like The Atlantic might know more than Mueller at this point.

I think the financial crimes end up being Trump's downfall. Conspiracy charges around the Russia stuff would be bad, but that's tough to prove absent direct evidence.

Money laundering? Tax evasion? Those are much easier to prove.

what financial crimes? the President hasn't been charged with any.

The President hasn’t been charged with anything.

this is true. he's innocent until proven guilty. that's not to say there won't be something legitimate, but there is no evidence of financial crimes by this administration related to any involvement with Russia.

A) I wouldn't expect there to be much, if any concrete evidence made public regarding financial crimes. But there are plenty of pieces of circumstantial evidence out there already.

B) The financial crimes may or may not be related to Russia, but it doesn't really matter. Crimes is crimes, yo.

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 2:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 2:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 12:57:00 PM (view original):
Treason is a crime. If it can be proven that the Russian government interfered in the presidential election, giving aid to a foreign adversary is treason. I'm not sure it matters whether he knew, especially if it can be proven that members of his campaign participated.

that said, we only have the word of the intelligence community as "evidence." that's not good enough for me. it's funny how everyone thinks they know the result of the probe before it is over. I feel like The Atlantic might know more than Mueller at this point.

I think the financial crimes end up being Trump's downfall. Conspiracy charges around the Russia stuff would be bad, but that's tough to prove absent direct evidence.

Money laundering? Tax evasion? Those are much easier to prove.

what financial crimes? the President hasn't been charged with any.

The President hasn’t been charged with anything.

this is true. he's innocent until proven guilty. that's not to say there won't be something legitimate, but there is no evidence of financial crimes by this administration related to any involvement with Russia.

A) I wouldn't expect there to be much, if any concrete evidence made public regarding financial crimes. But there are plenty of pieces of circumstantial evidence out there already.

B) The financial crimes may or may not be related to Russia, but it doesn't really matter. Crimes is crimes, yo.

therein lies the rub. we deserve to see the evidence. otherwise, the Republicans have the ability to call it a witch hunt. taking the word of Washington insiders is not what I do. we learned that lesson the hard way when "evidence" led us into Iraq.

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 2:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 2:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 2:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 1:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 12:57:00 PM (view original):
Treason is a crime. If it can be proven that the Russian government interfered in the presidential election, giving aid to a foreign adversary is treason. I'm not sure it matters whether he knew, especially if it can be proven that members of his campaign participated.

that said, we only have the word of the intelligence community as "evidence." that's not good enough for me. it's funny how everyone thinks they know the result of the probe before it is over. I feel like The Atlantic might know more than Mueller at this point.

I think the financial crimes end up being Trump's downfall. Conspiracy charges around the Russia stuff would be bad, but that's tough to prove absent direct evidence.

Money laundering? Tax evasion? Those are much easier to prove.

what financial crimes? the President hasn't been charged with any.

The President hasn’t been charged with anything.

this is true. he's innocent until proven guilty. that's not to say there won't be something legitimate, but there is no evidence of financial crimes by this administration related to any involvement with Russia.

A) I wouldn't expect there to be much, if any concrete evidence made public regarding financial crimes. But there are plenty of pieces of circumstantial evidence out there already.

B) The financial crimes may or may not be related to Russia, but it doesn't really matter. Crimes is crimes, yo.

therein lies the rub. we deserve to see the evidence. otherwise, the Republicans have the ability to call it a witch hunt. taking the word of Washington insiders is not what I do. we learned that lesson the hard way when "evidence" led us into Iraq.

I would assume that we will eventually see the evidence, either in a trial or in a report given to congress.

I don't expect them to lock him up based on secret info.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/2/2018 2:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Tucker T's on 8/2/2018 2:08:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bds9992 on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Tucker T's on 8/2/2018 1:59:00 PM (view original):


The Only Evidence . . .

this is the part where you mention Uranium One.

LMAO!!!

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/2/2018 2:36:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 2:45:00 PM (view original):
You were crying like a *****. Don’t lie.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/2/2018 2:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/2/2018 2:45:00 PM (view original):
You were crying like a *****. Don’t lie.

I was? LOL

See below

Posted by bad_luck on 8/1/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):
All countries have major issues. Enough of the US is dumb and/or racist enough to elect Trump President. That’s a major issue.

Then strikeout ***** slapped you and you ran away with your tail between your legs...again.

Progress...