Trump's military parade is estimated to cost $92 million – $80 million more than earlier estimate

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/16/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):
3. Yes but this is why we have the electoral college.
6. "HE" no he did not.
7. We don't know because we are not military or para military personnel.
11. No, I just see that we are doing a lot more now than we did 20 years ago when I had your views. Like we recycle weekly, etc. we have made progress. Don't be a dick.
14. I may vote 3rd party. I really don't like the religous stance of the Red or their ultra devotion to the 2nd amendment and I am pro choice, although I see how many are pro life. I am actually like a lot of Dem policies and ideas but I cannot forgive them for the Palestinian flag at the DNC. I know its my problem, not theirs.
15. OK
16. Add years 08-16 and then add years of 00-07 and see what number is bigger. Add the deficits.
21. Because everyone else already left (all other western countries). Yes, no need for an embassy in a highly unstable country that is anti west.
22. I am trying to make them aware as much as I can. I have personally converted over 100 myself. Honestly.

2. That doesn't discredit the polls. They were not predicting the electoral college.
6. Was it under the Obama administration that the auto industry was bailed out?
7. OK whatever.
11. I was joking. Yes we have made progress. Let's keep making progress.
14. If you want to vote 3rd party, I can understand that. Unfortunately both major 3rd party candidates last year sucked ***. I considered a vote for Bernie but I voted blue to do my part to not get Trump elected. Of course I live in Kansas so it was pretty pointless.
16. I looked at a chart of deficit over time. Clinton got us a surplus and it slowly turned into a deficit under Bush, and then tanked in 07. Obama was put in a bad spot but the deficit shrunk every year he was in office, and he basically got us to pre-recession levels. I don't think adding it is fair. Standard deviation would be better, or just looking at a chart. It's pretty obvious that Obama did a pretty good job with this.
21. So if a country is unstable and dislikes us, **** 'em. Got it. We will never have good relations with North Korea then.
22. I mean, if you believe in it I can't argue. Every person counts. 100 is very insignificant.

2) They were predicting an HRC win.
6) They got in when? Nov? Come on. Just stop it. Go watch Too Big to Fail. Bailouts were coming regardless of POTUS.
7) OK I am right.
11) OK
14) My votes don't count either.
16) Bush and Obama were both bad.
21) Correct.Civil is one thing. Good is another.
22) I know. I am hoping they spread the word.

2. They predicted that she would win the popular vote.
6. Fine, agree to disagree.
7. No I just don't feel like arguing this with you.
14. I didn't say my vote didn't count, I was saying that my vote is going to be overshadowed by a ton of dumb hicks voting red. And I am not calling all Republicans dumb hicks, but many specifically in Kansas are.
16. Sure, you can have that opinion, but Obama did lower the deficit. That's a good thing. Correct?
21. Right, but to have CIVIL relations we would have to have some relations.
22. OK to each his own. I hope to do the same with Social Democracy :)

2) No they predicted she would be the next POTUS. Stop it.
14) It doesn't count
16) For one year compared to another year. In his 8 years he never balanced the budget, never attacked enititlements and put on more debt than all of the prior presidents combined.
21) We have relations with everyone. They need us more than we need them.
22) Good Luck...You may change your mind in 20 years.

If it needs verified, b_l posted poll after poll after poll that "proved" to us HRC was going to be our POTUS. Just go back and look at them all.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/16/2018 6:04:00 PM (view original):
2) They were predicting an HRC win.
6) They got in when? Nov? Come on. Just stop it. Go watch Too Big to Fail. Bailouts were coming regardless of POTUS.
7) OK I am right.
11) OK
14) My votes don't count either.
16) Bush and Obama were both bad.
21) Correct.Civil is one thing. Good is another.
22) I know. I am hoping they spread the word.

2) The polls predicted that voters would choose Clinton by a slightly larger margin than they would choose Trump.

Which was 100% correct.


The prediction models like 538 and Upshot had her at around 70% to win.

As I’m sure you’re aware, 30% is still a fairly likely scenario.

Posted by tangplay on 8/16/2018 6:17:00 PM (view original):
2. They predicted that she would win the popular vote.
6. Fine, agree to disagree.
7. No I just don't feel like arguing this with you.
14. I didn't say my vote didn't count, I was saying that my vote is going to be overshadowed by a ton of dumb hicks voting red. And I am not calling all Republicans dumb hicks, but many specifically in Kansas are.
16. Sure, you can have that opinion, but Obama did lower the deficit. That's a good thing. Correct?
21. Right, but to have CIVIL relations we would have to have some relations.
22. OK to each his own. I hope to do the same with Social Democracy :)

If you want to advocate for social democracy, you need to prove that the ideas are economically feasible. Just saying that it's good because Tang and Bernie say so is not going to win many over. Prove to people that it's realistic economically.

Tang is socially conscious. He does not care about economics.

Posted by bad_luck on 8/17/2018 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/16/2018 6:04:00 PM (view original):
2) They were predicting an HRC win.
6) They got in when? Nov? Come on. Just stop it. Go watch Too Big to Fail. Bailouts were coming regardless of POTUS.
7) OK I am right.
11) OK
14) My votes don't count either.
16) Bush and Obama were both bad.
21) Correct.Civil is one thing. Good is another.
22) I know. I am hoping they spread the word.

2) The polls predicted that voters would choose Clinton by a slightly larger margin than they would choose Trump.

Which was 100% correct.


The prediction models like 538 and Upshot had her at around 70% to win.

As I’m sure you’re aware, 30% is still a fairly likely scenario.

Typical b_l trying to BS his way out of his stupidity. Go back and look - he was claiming double-digit victory for the loser beotch.

Posted by all3 on 8/17/2018 5:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/17/2018 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/16/2018 6:04:00 PM (view original):
2) They were predicting an HRC win.
6) They got in when? Nov? Come on. Just stop it. Go watch Too Big to Fail. Bailouts were coming regardless of POTUS.
7) OK I am right.
11) OK
14) My votes don't count either.
16) Bush and Obama were both bad.
21) Correct.Civil is one thing. Good is another.
22) I know. I am hoping they spread the word.

2) The polls predicted that voters would choose Clinton by a slightly larger margin than they would choose Trump.

Which was 100% correct.


The prediction models like 538 and Upshot had her at around 70% to win.

As I’m sure you’re aware, 30% is still a fairly likely scenario.

Typical b_l trying to BS his way out of his stupidity. Go back and look - he was claiming double-digit victory for the loser beotch.

BL is certainly an interesting person. Doesn't see the ultra Left as psychos.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/17/2018 11:06:00 AM (view original):
2) No they predicted she would be the next POTUS. Stop it.
14) It doesn't count
16) For one year compared to another year. In his 8 years he never balanced the budget, never attacked enititlements and put on more debt than all of the prior presidents combined.
21) We have relations with everyone. They need us more than we need them.
22) Good Luck...You may change your mind in 20 years.

2. I agree with what BL said on this.
14. Remove the electoral college.
16. I agree with your statement. I am saying that Obama did a good job with the deficit. Fair?
21. You just said that we shouldn't have relations with Libya or Iran.
22. I might. But I currently live in the here and now.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/17/2018 5:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 8/17/2018 5:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/17/2018 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/16/2018 6:04:00 PM (view original):
2) They were predicting an HRC win.
6) They got in when? Nov? Come on. Just stop it. Go watch Too Big to Fail. Bailouts were coming regardless of POTUS.
7) OK I am right.
11) OK
14) My votes don't count either.
16) Bush and Obama were both bad.
21) Correct.Civil is one thing. Good is another.
22) I know. I am hoping they spread the word.

2) The polls predicted that voters would choose Clinton by a slightly larger margin than they would choose Trump.

Which was 100% correct.


The prediction models like 538 and Upshot had her at around 70% to win.

As I’m sure you’re aware, 30% is still a fairly likely scenario.

Typical b_l trying to BS his way out of his stupidity. Go back and look - he was claiming double-digit victory for the loser beotch.

BL is certainly an interesting person. Doesn't see the ultra Left as psychos.

probably anyone you would call the ultra-anything are psychos.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/17/2018 5:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 8/17/2018 5:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/17/2018 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/16/2018 6:04:00 PM (view original):
2) They were predicting an HRC win.
6) They got in when? Nov? Come on. Just stop it. Go watch Too Big to Fail. Bailouts were coming regardless of POTUS.
7) OK I am right.
11) OK
14) My votes don't count either.
16) Bush and Obama were both bad.
21) Correct.Civil is one thing. Good is another.
22) I know. I am hoping they spread the word.

2) The polls predicted that voters would choose Clinton by a slightly larger margin than they would choose Trump.

Which was 100% correct.


The prediction models like 538 and Upshot had her at around 70% to win.

As I’m sure you’re aware, 30% is still a fairly likely scenario.

Typical b_l trying to BS his way out of his stupidity. Go back and look - he was claiming double-digit victory for the loser beotch.

BL is certainly an interesting person. Doesn't see the ultra Left as psychos.

?

Did you actually read what I wrote?

Posted by tangplay on 8/17/2018 5:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/17/2018 11:06:00 AM (view original):
2) No they predicted she would be the next POTUS. Stop it.
14) It doesn't count
16) For one year compared to another year. In his 8 years he never balanced the budget, never attacked enititlements and put on more debt than all of the prior presidents combined.
21) We have relations with everyone. They need us more than we need them.
22) Good Luck...You may change your mind in 20 years.

2. I agree with what BL said on this.
14. Remove the electoral college.
16. I agree with your statement. I am saying that Obama did a good job with the deficit. Fair?
21. You just said that we shouldn't have relations with Libya or Iran.
22. I might. But I currently live in the here and now.

Do you agree with what b_l wrote now, or what he wrote then, since they are totally different things (as b_l loves to do)?