Without you, who would I simultaneously troll in 3 different threads?

Posted by bad_luck on 8/27/2018 2:09:00 PM (view original):
Without you, who would I simultaneously troll in 3 different threads?

I am sure you'd find someone. They would block you though. So sad.

Would they?

Posted by bad_luck on 8/27/2018 2:13:00 PM (view original):
Would they?

They is a pronoun.

Are you sure about that?

Posted by bad_luck on 8/27/2018 2:18:00 PM (view original):
Are you sure about that?

You is a pronoun.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/27/2018 2:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/27/2018 2:09:00 PM (view original):
Without you, who would I simultaneously troll in 3 different threads?

I am sure you'd find someone. They would block you though. So sad.

MikeT revived

I miss how MikeT used to humilate bad luck.

I doubt MikeT 'humiliated' anyone. From the very limited experience I have had with him, he isn't a great debater.

Posted by tangplay on 8/27/2018 3:36:00 PM (view original):
I doubt MikeT 'humiliated' anyone. From the very limited experience I have had with him, he isn't a great debater.

Your experience was limited. Thank you. He schooled bad_luck.

It was. My experience was limited to him arguing that Abraham Lincoln caused the civil war. Sorry, but that experience is all I really need to know. He blocked me BTW. I made an argument that he couldn't refute so he just blocked me. XD.

Posted by tangplay on 8/27/2018 3:41:00 PM (view original):
It was. My experience was limited to him arguing that Abraham Lincoln caused the civil war. Sorry, but that experience is all I really need to know. He blocked me BTW. I made an argument that he couldn't refute so he just blocked me. XD.

LOL so you base your theory on one debate?

MikeTitty was a terrible debater. He only claimed victory through forfeit by boredom

Yes, b_l is so off-the-charts stupid that even Mike regularly abused him. Mike loved it too, because b_l was the one-and-only person he could ever make look bad. As tang says, Mike usually just kept telling people he was blocking them after they made him look foolish. That's where b_l got the practice from.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/26/2018 11:29:00 AM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 8/26/2018 3:04:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/25/2018 10:27:00 AM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 8/24/2018 6:44:00 PM (view original):
also, do you think there are many white corner backs out there with NFL talent who can't get a job because they are white?

My point it is that sometimes the naked eye doesn’t mean racism. There aren’t white CBs because they aren’t as good as the black ones. Nothing to do with racism.

Right...that is what I have been saying all along, so why do you keep bringing up what a high percentage of blacks there are in the NFL and NBA? I still don't understand what you are trying to say.

My point is that stats can be misleading. Tang and bad idiot keep bringing up stats and they state that African Americans don’t earn as much as whites because of racism. But that is not true. There are many factors that are involved in unequal outcomes and race may be at times and may not be at times. I don’t think companies or colleges will purposely deny the best candidate because of skin color. They will take the very best to help them succeed. Just like professional baseball teams do.

Yes, stats can be misleading. You can pretty much use stats to show whatever it is you want to show if you cherry pick whicg stats to use or how to interpret them. But as far as I am concerned, the high percentages of blacks in the NBA and NFL has very little (if anything) to do with the color of their skin, and a lot to do with their talent.