NO EVIDENCE. NO WITNESSES.

Posted by dino27 on 9/30/2018 1:29:00 PM (view original):
they are ruled inadmissible for trials.....they are considered reliable by fbi and cia - OFFICIALLY - and employees are obligated by law to take them...furthermore , kavenaugh himself has ruled in a decision that they are valid and useful tools by the federal government....you can look it up.

Dino please go away. Thank you.

he lives in the pit now

very popular over there

has followers who lick on his old clinks

it ded

Posted by cccp1014 on 9/30/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dino27 on 9/30/2018 1:29:00 PM (view original):
they are ruled inadmissible for trials.....they are considered reliable by fbi and cia - OFFICIALLY - and employees are obligated by law to take them...furthermore , kavenaugh himself has ruled in a decision that they are valid and useful tools by the federal government....you can look it up.

Dino please go away. Thank you.

he cant handle the truth...neither can kavenaugh......they cant handle the tooth.

that was my final comment.

Posted by dino27 on 9/30/2018 1:29:00 PM (view original):
they are ruled inadmissible for trials.....they are considered reliable by fbi and cia - OFFICIALLY - and employees are obligated by law to take them...furthermore , kavenaugh himself has ruled in a decision that they are valid and useful tools by the federal government....you can look it up.

You do realize that all you need to do to pass is stay calm, right? It's bogus science. Lots of people get away with crimes or are convicted unfairly due to it.

I believe this way regardless of the results. I don't buy innocence or guilt by polygraph.

I also seem to recall a certain person on this thread calling me an idiot for saying this a while back... I am sure their opinion on this hasn't changed.

i am not allowed to say anything so i wont...but the fbi and cia consider their tests reliable and are allowed to fire people and even charge them with crimes partially because of results...the courts uphold this.....the govt and the federal courts consider it to be a reliable tool...when done by federal experts of fbi and cia.

Posted by dino27 on 9/30/2018 9:03:00 PM (view original):
i am not allowed to say anything so i wont...but the fbi and cia consider their tests reliable and are allowed to fire people and even charge them with crimes partially because of results...the courts uphold this.....the govt and the federal courts consider it to be a reliable tool...when done by federal experts of fbi and cia.

They are wrong, sorry.

dont be sorry......but the experts say you are wrong......sorry.

http://www.apa.org/research/action/polygraph.aspx
https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92847&page=1
https://www.vox.com/2014/8/14/5999119/polygraphs-lie-detectors-do-they-work
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/21/health/lie-detector-facts-accuracy/index.html

Keep in mind that I don't hate lie detectors being used in court, per say, but I don't want to base innocence or guilt on it.

they are tools considered so reliable in the federal law enforcement array that the FBI could compel kavenaugh to take one in a matter of criminal inquiry or national security.....maybe mayberry lie detectors are not reliable but the FBI and CIA are experts and it is considered to be a reliable science with them......and the federal courts including kavenaugh specifically have held it to be......if he refuses the test and he will that is extremely telling....fbi agents and cia agents take them routinely.

Sure, whatever, believe what you want. I reserve my judgement.

of course you are entitled.........but im basing my opinion on the fbi and cia and nsa and the Pasadena pta.