Cali Dedication Topic

Show me where I conceded that.
10/29/2018 9:03 AM
It might have been miami. Anyway, we know your policies don't work. I can see that in my home state.
10/29/2018 9:16 AM
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 8:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 10/29/2018 8:08:00 AM (view original):
First off, Tang you focused on the income inequality portion of the article. I am not sure why people give a crap about income equality. It's irrelevant how much the top has. What matters is that the bottom is able to provide for their family.

Second, California policies, for whatever reason have led to a state of very high poverty rates. They might want to reevaluate their political beliefs as they are definitely not working.

Bernie built a platform around free education. California has this for low income earners and has indisputably the best college system in the country and yet still has all of these issues. Socialism just doesn't work.
Yeah and as I said Cali has high housing prices. That would make it harder to stabilize. Tons of other factors.

Cali isn't socialist. They are somewhat a social democracy. We know social democracy works elsewhere, as you yourself have conceded.
Name one place it works?
10/29/2018 9:28 AM
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 9:16:00 AM (view original):
It might have been miami. Anyway, we know your policies don't work. I can see that in my home state.
So, Kansas has a higher poverty rate than California?
10/29/2018 9:49 AM
Tang, it appears that "my" policies do work based on your state. Kansas is 10th in the country in lowest Supplemental poverty rate. You always bash your state, but it is doing much better than the "liberal" states.
10/29/2018 9:56 AM
California's poverty rate is 23.8% when adjusted for cost of living. Think about that. That's almost 1/4 of the people despite having more economic potential than any other state in the country. It has a beautiful coast, many tourism attractions, Silicon Valley, Hollywood.

And more to what you were saying, Tang. Look at many large cities. They have been ran by democrats for many years and are in terrible shape.

So yes. I would say "my" policies do work better.
10/29/2018 10:00 AM
Posted by cccp1014 on 10/29/2018 9:28:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 8:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 10/29/2018 8:08:00 AM (view original):
First off, Tang you focused on the income inequality portion of the article. I am not sure why people give a crap about income equality. It's irrelevant how much the top has. What matters is that the bottom is able to provide for their family.

Second, California policies, for whatever reason have led to a state of very high poverty rates. They might want to reevaluate their political beliefs as they are definitely not working.

Bernie built a platform around free education. California has this for low income earners and has indisputably the best college system in the country and yet still has all of these issues. Socialism just doesn't work.
Yeah and as I said Cali has high housing prices. That would make it harder to stabilize. Tons of other factors.

Cali isn't socialist. They are somewhat a social democracy. We know social democracy works elsewhere, as you yourself have conceded.
Name one place it works?
Scandinavia.
10/29/2018 10:30 AM
Posted by strikeout26 on 10/29/2018 9:49:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 9:16:00 AM (view original):
It might have been miami. Anyway, we know your policies don't work. I can see that in my home state.
So, Kansas has a higher poverty rate than California?
I didn't say that.
10/29/2018 10:31 AM
I know you never said that. I was showing you the flaw in your logic.
10/29/2018 10:33 AM
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 10:30:00 AM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 10/29/2018 9:28:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 8:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 10/29/2018 8:08:00 AM (view original):
First off, Tang you focused on the income inequality portion of the article. I am not sure why people give a crap about income equality. It's irrelevant how much the top has. What matters is that the bottom is able to provide for their family.

Second, California policies, for whatever reason have led to a state of very high poverty rates. They might want to reevaluate their political beliefs as they are definitely not working.

Bernie built a platform around free education. California has this for low income earners and has indisputably the best college system in the country and yet still has all of these issues. Socialism just doesn't work.
Yeah and as I said Cali has high housing prices. That would make it harder to stabilize. Tons of other factors.

Cali isn't socialist. They are somewhat a social democracy. We know social democracy works elsewhere, as you yourself have conceded.
Name one place it works?
Scandinavia.
Nope. Those are purely capitalist countries with some social policies. Also please let me know the % of non-scandanavians? Very homogeneous with tough immigration policies. The US has socialist programs too. SSI, Medicare, Medicaid.
10/29/2018 10:46 AM
Posted by strikeout26 on 10/29/2018 10:00:00 AM (view original):
California's poverty rate is 23.8% when adjusted for cost of living. Think about that. That's almost 1/4 of the people despite having more economic potential than any other state in the country. It has a beautiful coast, many tourism attractions, Silicon Valley, Hollywood.

And more to what you were saying, Tang. Look at many large cities. They have been ran by democrats for many years and are in terrible shape.

So yes. I would say "my" policies do work better.
Yeah, you are wrong. Kansas is in a **** ton of debt and we have terrible infersstructure and education.
10/29/2018 11:14 AM
Posted by cccp1014 on 10/29/2018 10:46:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 10:30:00 AM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 10/29/2018 9:28:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 10/29/2018 8:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 10/29/2018 8:08:00 AM (view original):
First off, Tang you focused on the income inequality portion of the article. I am not sure why people give a crap about income equality. It's irrelevant how much the top has. What matters is that the bottom is able to provide for their family.

Second, California policies, for whatever reason have led to a state of very high poverty rates. They might want to reevaluate their political beliefs as they are definitely not working.

Bernie built a platform around free education. California has this for low income earners and has indisputably the best college system in the country and yet still has all of these issues. Socialism just doesn't work.
Yeah and as I said Cali has high housing prices. That would make it harder to stabilize. Tons of other factors.

Cali isn't socialist. They are somewhat a social democracy. We know social democracy works elsewhere, as you yourself have conceded.
Name one place it works?
Scandinavia.
Nope. Those are purely capitalist countries with some social policies. Also please let me know the % of non-scandanavians? Very homogeneous with tough immigration policies. The US has socialist programs too. SSI, Medicare, Medicaid.
Yes. Mo

Those are purely capitalist countries with some social policies

That is social democracy.

10/29/2018 11:19 AM
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/08/nordic-socialism-context-key-policies-will-not-work-in-the-us/

10/29/2018 1:06 PM
Yeah, they aren't socialist. They are social democracies. Capitalist.
10/29/2018 3:07 PM
Point is what works there would not work here.

Nationalized Healthcare is a myth.
10/29/2018 3:25 PM
◂ Prev 123456 Next ▸
Cali Dedication Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.