Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 11/8/2018 1:15:00 PM (view original):
You and b_l keep saying that, but you keep dodging the question of who pays for housing, feeding and caring for these people for the period (possibly years, according to even b_l's post) the process takes.
They pay for it themselves. They aren't eligible for benefits.
"They pay for it themselves." Now I know you're saying totally moronic sheit just for the sake of argument.

Please tell us how many people in the caravan you think have enough money to support themselves for one day, let alone the year + it may take to get them through the process.
11/8/2018 4:08 PM
So you are arguing to change the system to have us pay for them? I mean, I agree that that is a problem.
11/8/2018 4:16 PM
Quit pretending you're b_l. It is you and he who seem intent on the US paying to take care of these people for the duration of the asylum process, or do you think Mexico is going to house and care for them for over a year? (Because they sure aren't paying for it themselves.)
11/8/2018 4:21 PM
WWJD?
11/8/2018 4:30 PM
11/8/2018 4:37 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 2:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 11/8/2018 1:15:00 PM (view original):
You and b_l keep saying that, but you keep dodging the question of who pays for housing, feeding and caring for these people for the period (possibly years, according to even b_l's post) the process takes.
They pay for it themselves. They aren't eligible for benefits.
The dad comes down with lung cancer. Has no insurance. He pays for it himself? How?
Yes, we should definitely deny everyone asylum on the off chance that one asylum seeker will come down with a terminal illness while they are pending a hearing.

******* retard.
11/8/2018 4:55 PM
Posted by all3 on 11/8/2018 4:21:00 PM (view original):
Quit pretending you're b_l. It is you and he who seem intent on the US paying to take care of these people for the duration of the asylum process, or do you think Mexico is going to house and care for them for over a year? (Because they sure aren't paying for it themselves.)
I never said that. You just made an argument for changing the system to do that, not me.

Pick a lane.
11/8/2018 4:56 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 4:55:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 2:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 11/8/2018 1:15:00 PM (view original):
You and b_l keep saying that, but you keep dodging the question of who pays for housing, feeding and caring for these people for the period (possibly years, according to even b_l's post) the process takes.
They pay for it themselves. They aren't eligible for benefits.
The dad comes down with lung cancer. Has no insurance. He pays for it himself? How?
Yes, we should definitely deny everyone asylum on the off chance that one asylum seeker will come down with a terminal illness while they are pending a hearing.

******* retard.
Dad breaks an ankle. Son catches pneumonia. Mom has a bad allergic reaction. There could be 100s of medical situations. What if kids need vaccines? Who pays? You talk so bravely on these boards. Face to face you would not be as brazen. Typical Leftist.
11/8/2018 6:00 PM (edited)
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 6:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 4:55:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 2:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 11/8/2018 1:15:00 PM (view original):
You and b_l keep saying that, but you keep dodging the question of who pays for housing, feeding and caring for these people for the period (possibly years, according to even b_l's post) the process takes.
They pay for it themselves. They aren't eligible for benefits.
The dad comes down with lung cancer. Has no insurance. He pays for it himself? How?
Yes, we should definitely deny everyone asylum on the off chance that one asylum seeker will come down with a terminal illness while they are pending a hearing.

******* retard.
Dad breaks an ankle. Son catches pneumonia. Mom has a bad allergic reaction. There could be 100s of medical situations. What if kids need vaccines? Who pays? You talk so bravely on these boards. Face to face you would not be as brazen. Typical Leftist.
Those are all relatively minor and relatively inexpensive issues. I would consider them a small price to pay while doing the right thing.

And I would call you a retard to your face, don’t worry.
11/8/2018 6:23 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 6:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 6:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 4:55:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 2:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/8/2018 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 11/8/2018 1:15:00 PM (view original):
You and b_l keep saying that, but you keep dodging the question of who pays for housing, feeding and caring for these people for the period (possibly years, according to even b_l's post) the process takes.
They pay for it themselves. They aren't eligible for benefits.
The dad comes down with lung cancer. Has no insurance. He pays for it himself? How?
Yes, we should definitely deny everyone asylum on the off chance that one asylum seeker will come down with a terminal illness while they are pending a hearing.

******* retard.
Dad breaks an ankle. Son catches pneumonia. Mom has a bad allergic reaction. There could be 100s of medical situations. What if kids need vaccines? Who pays? You talk so bravely on these boards. Face to face you would not be as brazen. Typical Leftist.
Those are all relatively minor and relatively inexpensive issues. I would consider them a small price to pay while doing the right thing.

And I would call you a retard to your face, don’t worry.
The "right thing" is subjective and small prices add up to a big bill. Yeah, because you're a rude person. Calling someone a retard who disagrees with you politically. Real mature. I'd spin kick you in the face but you'd probably sue me since you are a sissy boy.
11/8/2018 7:29 PM
um, cccp...you constantly call people who disagree with you idiots and morons. Showing your hypocrisy again??? You're also always talking about how you'd kick BL's ***. Why is violence always the answer for you?
11/8/2018 7:33 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 11/8/2018 7:33:00 PM (view original):
um, cccp...you constantly call people who disagree with you idiots and morons. Showing your hypocrisy again??? You're also always talking about how you'd kick BL's ***. Why is violence always the answer for you?
Bleh...I do it here but if I saw you, tang or Taint in person I would be very polite. Bad Luck? I'd be polite too. Although he would annoy me.
11/8/2018 7:35 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 7:35:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 11/8/2018 7:33:00 PM (view original):
um, cccp...you constantly call people who disagree with you idiots and morons. Showing your hypocrisy again??? You're also always talking about how you'd kick BL's ***. Why is violence always the answer for you?
Bleh...I do it here but if I saw you, tang or Taint in person I would be very polite. Bad Luck? I'd be polite too. Although he would annoy me.
I think almost all of us would sit at a table and be civil and our bullshit online bravado would go right out the window. As long as that one guy isn’t there.
11/8/2018 8:05 PM
Posted by rsp777 on 11/8/2018 8:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 7:35:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 11/8/2018 7:33:00 PM (view original):
um, cccp...you constantly call people who disagree with you idiots and morons. Showing your hypocrisy again??? You're also always talking about how you'd kick BL's ***. Why is violence always the answer for you?
Bleh...I do it here but if I saw you, tang or Taint in person I would be very polite. Bad Luck? I'd be polite too. Although he would annoy me.
I think almost all of us would sit at a table and be civil and our bullshit online bravado would go right out the window. As long as that one guy isn’t there.
I agree 100%.
11/8/2018 8:07 PM
Posted by rsp777 on 11/8/2018 8:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/8/2018 7:35:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 11/8/2018 7:33:00 PM (view original):
um, cccp...you constantly call people who disagree with you idiots and morons. Showing your hypocrisy again??? You're also always talking about how you'd kick BL's ***. Why is violence always the answer for you?
Bleh...I do it here but if I saw you, tang or Taint in person I would be very polite. Bad Luck? I'd be polite too. Although he would annoy me.
I think almost all of us would sit at a table and be civil and our bullshit online bravado would go right out the window. As long as that one guy isn’t there.
You bring the blow, I'll bring the hookers.
11/8/2018 8:16 PM
◂ Prev 1...11|12|13|14|15|16 Next ▸

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.