"Dems" a fightin' word Topic

Posted by wylie715 on 11/23/2018 1:17:00 AM (view original):
Democrats are not anti-Jew. Sure, some of them are, but not all of them. Just like some Red Sox fans are actually decent people. Not many, but I am sure there must be a few.
I vehemently disagree. In fact eventually that party will have to make a choice. Are they pro Israel or Pro Islam. Cannot be both and by the most recent election results I see they are headed toward the pro Islam track.

Its like saying one can be a Red Sox or a Yankees fan. Cannot be both. Eventually you have to decide.
11/23/2018 10:46 AM
Posted by The Taint on 11/22/2018 2:07:00 AM (view original):

The sharp cut in tax rates President Trump signed last year was supposed to trigger an investment boom. In June, six months after the tax cuts went into effect, Trump called the tax-cut law an “economic miracle” and said, “Our country is doing so well. I don’t think it’s ever done like this, in terms of the economy.”

The miracle was more like a mirage. One key element of the Republican tax legislation was a sharp cut in the corporate tax rate, from 35% to 21%, which went into effect at the start of the year. As expected, the tax cuts roughly doubled the growth rate in corporate profits. Investors expected a stock-market rally. Yet equities have wobbled all year and the S&P 500 is now down about 6% in 2018.

The market, apparently, hasn’t been fooled by the bubbly math accompanying the corporate tax cuts. Earnings growth for the S&P 500 rose from 12% last year to an estimated 23% this year, according to Goldman Sachs. But EPS growth is likely to drop back to 6% next year and just 4% in 2020. Those numbers are still good, and the lower growth rates of the next two years will come atop higher baseline profits. But the sharp slowdown in earnings growth that investors now expect explains a good part of the stock-market selloff of the last two months.

Trump also claimed that corporations overflowing with profits would spend bigly on new facilities and more workers. But that isn’t happening, either. A variety of indicators, such as business fixed investment and capital goods orders, show that businesses are spending at roughly the same pace, or perhaps even a bit less, than they were before the tax cuts went into effect. “There has been a clear leveling off in both capital goods orders and shipments, which suggests that the near stagnation in business equipment investment in the third quarter may be the beginning of a more sustained weakness,” research firm Capital Economics wrote recently to clients. Stagnation was not something Trump or his fellow Republicans promised.

Job growth is strong, one reason the underlying economy remains relatively healthy. But the pace of job growth, averaging 213,00 new jobs per month, is just slightly above the pace in 2016 and 2017, and actually lower than the pace of job growth in 2014 and 2015. The White House says the corporate tax cuts will eventually raise pay by around $4,000 per year, which would be a 6.5% raise for a family earning the median household income of around $63,000. But pay this year is only rising by 3.1%, which is better than last year but still barely ahead of inflation. The tax windfall hasn’t trickled down yet.

As for the overall economy, GDP growth was strong in the second quarter of this year, at 4.2%—but that may have been the peak. The third-quarter growth rate dropped to 3.5%, and fourth quarter growth is running at just 2.3%, according to forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers. Most economists expect a slowdown during the next two years, perhaps to 2% growth. Stocks have sold off during the last several weeks in large measure because investors believe slower growth will put a lid on corporate profits and possibly lead to a recession.

Republicans who were the sole backers of last year’s tax cuts thought voters would thank them with a Republican sweep in the 2018 midterms, which was obviously a miscalculation. Many Americans say they haven’t noticed any tax cut for themselves, even as corporate coffers swell. Meanwhile, the government’s annual deficit, which normally goes down when the economy is strong because more economic activity generates more tax revenue, is going the opposite direction now. Annual deficits will soon top $1 trillion, with some analysts worried all that federal borrowing could force interest rates higher—another worrying contributing to the selloff in stocks.

So nearly a year after the historic Republican tax cuts, the stock market is lower, a growth slowdown seems to be underway and investors are worried about soaring levels of federal debt. This party barely got started before it was over.

JPM disagrees. I believe the best bank in the world over some biased Yahoo! Leftist.
11/23/2018 10:47 AM
Posted by wylie715 on 11/23/2018 1:21:00 AM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 11/22/2018 10:15:00 AM (view original):
Voting against people like Ocasio-Cortez because of her race or gender or whatever, is immediately labeled racism or sexism or some ism by the Libs, but voting for her for that very same reason is called "support". Total hypocritical BS. People who proudly said "I voted for Obama because he's black." or "I voted for HRC because she's a woman." are Racists and Sexists just as much as those who voted against them for those reasons. THAT is the point you Libs (Hilarious that you have come to take that as some kind of offensive slur.) are missing in your haste to spread your hate.
Thankfully for you, we live in a Country where such garbage is allowed. You should certainly remember to give thanks for that today.
I don't recall anyone here saying they voted for Obama because he is black, or the voted for HRC because she is a woman. I may have missed someone saying that, but I don't recall it. Yes, some people voted for Obama because he is black, and some people voted for HRC because she is a woman (at lest I think she is), but I'd think there were just as many who refused to vote for Obama because he is black or refuse to vote for HRC because she is a woman. I voted for both of them because I felt they were the best option available. I still think that.
Again missing the entire point because you want to argue.
If anyone (not just posters on this site) voted for either of those candidates (or any candidate) simply because of their race, gender or the like, then they are just as sexist, racist or whatever, as anyone who voted against them for that same reason, yet Liberals will loudly scream "___ist, ___ist, ___ist" at the one while applauding the support shown by the other. Textbook hypocrisy. You going to try to pretend that's not true or defend it?
11/23/2018 10:58 AM
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/23/2018 10:46:00 AM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 11/23/2018 1:17:00 AM (view original):
Democrats are not anti-Jew. Sure, some of them are, but not all of them. Just like some Red Sox fans are actually decent people. Not many, but I am sure there must be a few.
I vehemently disagree. In fact eventually that party will have to make a choice. Are they pro Israel or Pro Islam. Cannot be both and by the most recent election results I see they are headed toward the pro Islam track.

Its like saying one can be a Red Sox or a Yankees fan. Cannot be both. Eventually you have to decide.
Pro/anti-Israel =/= pro/anti-Jew.

Israel is another country. Not a religion. They might take action that isn’t in the best interest of the US.
11/23/2018 3:26 PM
You mean....Like .....Mexico-Canada-China-Iran-France-South Africa-Venezuela-Cuba-Germany-Saudi Arabia-RussiaRussiaRussia?
11/23/2018 5:25 PM
Hey Doug! Suck a dick on this fine holiday weekend!
11/23/2018 6:24 PM
Posted by The Taint on 11/23/2018 6:24:00 PM (view original):
Hey Doug! Suck a dick on this fine holiday weekend!
You have been forgiven by me. But not by me. Jesus did that for you.

I wish you the best this Thanksgiving where we give thanks to GOD for the founding of America.

This is the time we give Thanksgiving for his wisdom in the creation of this nation.

We recommit ourselves every year to love, honor, family, commitment, GOD and our neighbors.

Thank you for reaching out and never stop following. You should be pretty good at it by now.
11/23/2018 6:40 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 11/23/2018 10:47:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 11/22/2018 2:07:00 AM (view original):

The sharp cut in tax rates President Trump signed last year was supposed to trigger an investment boom. In June, six months after the tax cuts went into effect, Trump called the tax-cut law an “economic miracle” and said, “Our country is doing so well. I don’t think it’s ever done like this, in terms of the economy.”

The miracle was more like a mirage. One key element of the Republican tax legislation was a sharp cut in the corporate tax rate, from 35% to 21%, which went into effect at the start of the year. As expected, the tax cuts roughly doubled the growth rate in corporate profits. Investors expected a stock-market rally. Yet equities have wobbled all year and the S&P 500 is now down about 6% in 2018.

The market, apparently, hasn’t been fooled by the bubbly math accompanying the corporate tax cuts. Earnings growth for the S&P 500 rose from 12% last year to an estimated 23% this year, according to Goldman Sachs. But EPS growth is likely to drop back to 6% next year and just 4% in 2020. Those numbers are still good, and the lower growth rates of the next two years will come atop higher baseline profits. But the sharp slowdown in earnings growth that investors now expect explains a good part of the stock-market selloff of the last two months.

Trump also claimed that corporations overflowing with profits would spend bigly on new facilities and more workers. But that isn’t happening, either. A variety of indicators, such as business fixed investment and capital goods orders, show that businesses are spending at roughly the same pace, or perhaps even a bit less, than they were before the tax cuts went into effect. “There has been a clear leveling off in both capital goods orders and shipments, which suggests that the near stagnation in business equipment investment in the third quarter may be the beginning of a more sustained weakness,” research firm Capital Economics wrote recently to clients. Stagnation was not something Trump or his fellow Republicans promised.

Job growth is strong, one reason the underlying economy remains relatively healthy. But the pace of job growth, averaging 213,00 new jobs per month, is just slightly above the pace in 2016 and 2017, and actually lower than the pace of job growth in 2014 and 2015. The White House says the corporate tax cuts will eventually raise pay by around $4,000 per year, which would be a 6.5% raise for a family earning the median household income of around $63,000. But pay this year is only rising by 3.1%, which is better than last year but still barely ahead of inflation. The tax windfall hasn’t trickled down yet.

As for the overall economy, GDP growth was strong in the second quarter of this year, at 4.2%—but that may have been the peak. The third-quarter growth rate dropped to 3.5%, and fourth quarter growth is running at just 2.3%, according to forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers. Most economists expect a slowdown during the next two years, perhaps to 2% growth. Stocks have sold off during the last several weeks in large measure because investors believe slower growth will put a lid on corporate profits and possibly lead to a recession.

Republicans who were the sole backers of last year’s tax cuts thought voters would thank them with a Republican sweep in the 2018 midterms, which was obviously a miscalculation. Many Americans say they haven’t noticed any tax cut for themselves, even as corporate coffers swell. Meanwhile, the government’s annual deficit, which normally goes down when the economy is strong because more economic activity generates more tax revenue, is going the opposite direction now. Annual deficits will soon top $1 trillion, with some analysts worried all that federal borrowing could force interest rates higher—another worrying contributing to the selloff in stocks.

So nearly a year after the historic Republican tax cuts, the stock market is lower, a growth slowdown seems to be underway and investors are worried about soaring levels of federal debt. This party barely got started before it was over.

JPM disagrees. I believe the best bank in the world over some biased Yahoo! Leftist.
Oh god that's just sad.
11/24/2018 1:54 AM
Posted by all3 on 11/23/2018 10:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 11/23/2018 1:21:00 AM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 11/22/2018 10:15:00 AM (view original):
Voting against people like Ocasio-Cortez because of her race or gender or whatever, is immediately labeled racism or sexism or some ism by the Libs, but voting for her for that very same reason is called "support". Total hypocritical BS. People who proudly said "I voted for Obama because he's black." or "I voted for HRC because she's a woman." are Racists and Sexists just as much as those who voted against them for those reasons. THAT is the point you Libs (Hilarious that you have come to take that as some kind of offensive slur.) are missing in your haste to spread your hate.
Thankfully for you, we live in a Country where such garbage is allowed. You should certainly remember to give thanks for that today.
I don't recall anyone here saying they voted for Obama because he is black, or the voted for HRC because she is a woman. I may have missed someone saying that, but I don't recall it. Yes, some people voted for Obama because he is black, and some people voted for HRC because she is a woman (at lest I think she is), but I'd think there were just as many who refused to vote for Obama because he is black or refuse to vote for HRC because she is a woman. I voted for both of them because I felt they were the best option available. I still think that.
Again missing the entire point because you want to argue.
If anyone (not just posters on this site) voted for either of those candidates (or any candidate) simply because of their race, gender or the like, then they are just as sexist, racist or whatever, as anyone who voted against them for that same reason, yet Liberals will loudly scream "___ist, ___ist, ___ist" at the one while applauding the support shown by the other. Textbook hypocrisy. You going to try to pretend that's not true or defend it?
No. I agree. People do that, and it racist and sexist.
11/24/2018 2:00 AM
It’s so refreshing to see dummy hammering away with his MYTHEOLOGY. There’s really nothing like a guy defending the bottom-feeder garbage he posts here with a desperate cling to the rope of his religion.
11/24/2018 6:53 AM
My OPINION:
All3 is totally a partisan hack. He never uses the left in a positive light and almost always uses the right in a positive manner.

11/24/2018 12:02 PM


YEAH! Like tang is the defender of the right. Look at him. He's got a severe case of mennonitoisis.

It's where you pretend one way and do the other. Too much fake news.
11/24/2018 3:43 PM


Are we going too fast for you?
11/24/2018 4:40 PM
Posted by DougOut on 11/24/2018 3:43:00 PM (view original):


YEAH! Like tang is the defender of the right. Look at him. He's got a severe case of mennonitoisis.

It's where you pretend one way and do the other. Too much fake news.
It's Arkady.

He's a Russkie spy...

BOO!!!

dummy even uses russians in his attempted insults

11/24/2018 4:45 PM
Posted by tangplay on 11/24/2018 12:02:00 PM (view original):
My OPINION:
All3 is totally a partisan hack. He never uses the left in a positive light and almost always uses the right in a positive manner.

Try to change the subject when you can't face the truth. Another b_l "trick". You really have become a pathetic joke. (Insult #1)
11/24/2018 4:47 PM
◂ Prev 1...5|6|7|8|9...11 Next ▸
"Dems" a fightin' word Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.