Posted by wylie715 on 12/14/2018 12:20:00 PM (view original):
who the hell cares? they are both lying politicians

A lot of people care that the President is a criminal. And more should care. It's a big deal.

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:05:00 PM (view original):
My point, again, is that anyone who sees the evidence against Clinton as significant and the evidence against Trump as insignificant (as you do, apparently), is a ******* moron.

I just said IDC about Clinton and its apples and oranges. Her alleged crimes consist of pay for play. Trump's is hush $$ to keep out of tabloids. Trump would have been doing this even if he were not running for POTUS. Not sure why you cannot get this.

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 12/14/2018 12:20:00 PM (view original):
who the hell cares? they are both lying politicians

A lot of people care that the President is a criminal. And more should care. It's a big deal.

Criminal? LOL
Paying Stormy is not the same as grabbing cash because you were Secy of State and using leverage of favors to make yourself rich. Come on bad luck, you're failing here. Bigly.

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 12:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:05:00 PM (view original):
My point, again, is that anyone who sees the evidence against Clinton as significant and the evidence against Trump as insignificant (as you do, apparently), is a ******* moron.

I just said IDC about Clinton and its apples and oranges. Her alleged crimes consist of pay for play. Trump's is hush $$ to keep out of tabloids. Trump would have been doing this even if he were not running for POTUS. Not sure why you cannot get this.

Literally every sworn testimony so far is that the payments were made to protect the campaign.

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 12:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 12/14/2018 12:20:00 PM (view original):
who the hell cares? they are both lying politicians

A lot of people care that the President is a criminal. And more should care. It's a big deal.

Criminal? LOL
Paying Stormy is not the same as grabbing cash because you were Secy of State and using leverage of favors to make yourself rich. Come on bad luck, you're failing here. Bigly.

Paying her off to protect the campaign and then trying to hide it is a felony.

Posted by all3 on 12/14/2018 10:22:00 AM (view original):
Same sheit you, and others, have been posting here for 2 years bob.
What part of "When (if) something is proven, THEN bash and convict him." is hard to understand?
Why is is so hard to afford someone elected POTUS the same rights you'd afford someone living under a bridge?
Why can't you understand that nobody from any Country will respect our President if we don't?

Let me see If I understand what you are saying.............

The POTUS you'd like everyone to "respect" first told all us American potential voters that all these women were nuts, loony liars.
Now He admits that that wasn't really the case at all, but so what.........it isn't a crime.
On the Russia stuff, 1st he said he'd NEVER had any dealings with Russia but NOW claims it is only a "technical" campaign violation similar to something Obama supposedly did.
His personal lawyer and "fixer" is now sentenced. His company CFO is cooperating as part of a deal. His former campaign manager is in jail facing a difficult prospect over financial dealings associated with Crimea or somewhere.

Every damn thing he says is a freaking LIE.
And Mr. Mueller (a man with high credibility and a stellar record) hasn't even finished his probe NOR has he tipped his hand at how much He already knows.
And many (You probably?) Trump supporters are now standing on the ground that well, yea, but you can't indict a sitting POTUS.

Just what part of all that don't YOU understand??
His time in office has a DARK shadow already over it and I'll make you a public proposition right here right now.......... I'll bet you $1000.00 cold cash that Trump NEVER sees a day of a second term as POTUS for any number of reasons.
The primary one being that NOBODY but a few stubborn fools will have ANY respect for him, just as I have NONE for him now........

BECAUSE (you blind fool) He is NOT worthy of MY respect nor anyone else's who possesses a clear mind!
Just what part of THAT do you not understand??

Maybe you are different all3, but I do not respect someone because of what they do. I respect them (or don't)for who they are. In general I respect policemen/women but does that mean I respect every policeman or woman? No, some of them do not deserve respect. Same goes for firemen, soldiers and any other group you can name. I respect the office of the President of the United States. That does not mean I have to respect the person who occupies that office. If Trump wants respect from me or other countries, maybe he should stop acting like a buffoon, but its probably too late.

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 12:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:05:00 PM (view original):
My point, again, is that anyone who sees the evidence against Clinton as significant and the evidence against Trump as insignificant (as you do, apparently), is a ******* moron.

I just said IDC about Clinton and its apples and oranges. Her alleged crimes consist of pay for play. Trump's is hush $$ to keep out of tabloids. Trump would have been doing this even if he were not running for POTUS. Not sure why you cannot get this.

Literally every sworn testimony so far is that the payments were made to protect the campaign.

Link? What sworn statements?

Jose Canseco is ready to take a swing at politics.

The former major league slugger has made his pitch for a big job at the White House, tweeting to President Donald Trump: "u need a bash brother for Chief if (sic) Staff."

Canseco told his "little buddy" he has "a secret reorg plan already." He suggested Trump send him a direct message and signed off (hashtag)yeswecanseco.

The outspoken Canseco knows his way around Washington. He testified on Capitol Hill before Congress during its 2005 hearings into the use of steroids in baseball.

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 2:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 12:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:05:00 PM (view original):
My point, again, is that anyone who sees the evidence against Clinton as significant and the evidence against Trump as insignificant (as you do, apparently), is a ******* moron.

I just said IDC about Clinton and its apples and oranges. Her alleged crimes consist of pay for play. Trump's is hush $$ to keep out of tabloids. Trump would have been doing this even if he were not running for POTUS. Not sure why you cannot get this.

Literally every sworn testimony so far is that the payments were made to protect the campaign.

Link? What sworn statements?

This is not difficult.

Cohen has sworn, under oath, that the payments were made to protect the campaign. AMI president David Pecker has sworn, under oath, that the payment was made to protect the campaign and it was made in coordination with the campaign.

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 2:47:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 2:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 12/14/2018 12:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 12/14/2018 12:05:00 PM (view original):
My point, again, is that anyone who sees the evidence against Clinton as significant and the evidence against Trump as insignificant (as you do, apparently), is a ******* moron.

I just said IDC about Clinton and its apples and oranges. Her alleged crimes consist of pay for play. Trump's is hush $$ to keep out of tabloids. Trump would have been doing this even if he were not running for POTUS. Not sure why you cannot get this.

Literally every sworn testimony so far is that the payments were made to protect the campaign.

Link? What sworn statements?

This is not difficult.

Cohen has sworn, under oath, that the payments were made to protect the campaign. AMI president David Pecker has sworn, under oath, that the payment was made to protect the campaign and it was made in coordination with the campaign.

You mean those who lied before and had something to gain from this? OK

I’ll believe their statements under oath over their statements to the press prior on this. I guess we’ll see what kind of corroborating documentation the investigators have.

He never proclaimed Trump guilty.