Lets debate! Topic

Posted by dino27 on 2/14/2019 8:56:00 PM (view original):
are you going to have warnings on hamburgers or any high calorie food too...fast food joints post calorie content.
Yep and definitely calorie counts. Right on dino the redline machino
2/14/2019 10:46 PM
Commie and K are horribly uninformed and have ZERO idea about the truth of marijuana. At least K recognizes that it should be legal, but all of the associations to fat and the munchies are moronic, childish, unintelligent and have no validity to them. You can spout all the recycled nonsense that you want but if you actually got off your ***** and did some minimal research you would see how completely ridiculous you sound in a very short time. You both also seem to have little personal experience with marijuana. God forbid you actually KNOW what you're talking about in the literal sense. I also find your ignorance to the medicinal benefits both physically and psychologically quite appalling. Both of you could use some serious deprogramming because, when it comes to marijuana, you are both obviously brainwashed by the pharmaceuticals, plastics, textiles and myriad other industries that have lobbied against marijuana for centuries.

End of lesson.
2/14/2019 10:48 PM
Parasite, I said it should be legal but should come with warning labels. Are you seriously stating that people never get munchies from it?
2/14/2019 11:12 PM
omg..munchies...alert the fda - kook !
next the super bowl is going to start with a stern annual warning about overeating from michelle o.
and forget about thanksgiving....outlaw it for children.
and put a warning on the turkey.
2/14/2019 11:32 PM
Posted by rsp777 on 2/14/2019 10:48:00 PM (view original):
Commie and K are horribly uninformed and have ZERO idea about the truth of marijuana. At least K recognizes that it should be legal, but all of the associations to fat and the munchies are moronic, childish, unintelligent and have no validity to them. You can spout all the recycled nonsense that you want but if you actually got off your ***** and did some minimal research you would see how completely ridiculous you sound in a very short time. You both also seem to have little personal experience with marijuana. God forbid you actually KNOW what you're talking about in the literal sense. I also find your ignorance to the medicinal benefits both physically and psychologically quite appalling. Both of you could use some serious deprogramming because, when it comes to marijuana, you are both obviously brainwashed by the pharmaceuticals, plastics, textiles and myriad other industries that have lobbied against marijuana for centuries.

End of lesson.
You write this, but you have yet to put out any actual evidence to support your argument. If you remember, I actually cited evidence from the APA. It looks like I may possibly be more informed than you. If you want to cite some evidence to support your claims, go for it. So far, you have just mimicked the talking points of the left.
2/15/2019 6:03 AM

2/15/2019 6:41 AM

2/15/2019 6:42 AM
Topic of the day: The death penalty

Let's hear your thoughts
2/15/2019 8:39 AM
I am against it. Too much risk of an innocent death. Costs too much. Impractical. That's without getting into ethical reasons.
2/15/2019 8:57 AM
All I have to say about this is that anyone who is willing to kill an innocent child inside it's mother should certainly be willing to kill a POS that has already cost society enough time, suffering and money to be convicted for life.
2/15/2019 9:21 AM
Posted by strikeout26 on 2/15/2019 8:39:00 AM (view original):
Topic of the day: The death penalty

Let's hear your thoughts
The death penalty is wrong. We shouldn’t do it.
2/15/2019 9:42 AM
Love the substance to everyone's posts so far. Congrats!
2/15/2019 9:55 AM
Posted by all3 on 2/15/2019 9:21:00 AM (view original):
All I have to say about this is that anyone who is willing to kill an innocent child inside it's mother should certainly be willing to kill a POS that has already cost society enough time, suffering and money to be convicted for life.
It costs more money to do the death penalty.
2/15/2019 10:10 AM
  1. I am 100% for it.
  2. It should be 100% clear that the person is guilty -- example Parkland shooting
  3. Should be done quickly. None of this years of appeal.
Those who say it is wrong = subjective. Those who say it costs too much = fix it so it does not. I don't see how you can be anti death penalty but pro choice? It makes you a hypocrite IMO. I am pro choice for the reasons we discussed. But I am also 100% pro death penatly in certain situations.

Now I have to address this: "Too much risk of an innocent death". That is true in war as well so should we NEVER ever go to war? Of course not. Sometimes there are consquences.
2/15/2019 10:39 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
◂ Prev 1...97|98|99|100|101...229 Next ▸
Lets debate! Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.