Establish a “Guilt Beyond All Doubt” verdict with strict eligibility and conviction guidelines based on severity of crime and removal of ALL doubt of guilt. Line ‘em up and kill ‘em all if you are you are convicted under said new guidelines. No appeals, no waiting in line for the gallows. Straight up justice served cold. Kill and be killed. End of problem.

Executions should be held in a public area and attended by all. They should be used only to "cull the herd" and remove people that our beloved President finds offensive.. Federal lottery should be established and the winner gets to pull the switch.

i am pro choice on abortion and pro choice on execution.
there should be mandated death penalty in limited situations.
otherwise the convicted murderer can choose life in prison or death penalty.

Posted by dino27 on 2/15/2019 12:15:00 PM (view original):
i am pro choice on abortion and pro choice on execution.
there should be mandated death penalty in limited situations.
otherwise the convicted murderer can choose life in prison or death penalty.

A murderer convicted of “Guilt Beyond All Doubt” in my statement above should have zero “choice” the same way their victim had no “choice.” Kill and be killed. Problem solved.

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/15/2019 10:39:00 AM (view original):

1. I am 100% for it.
2. It should be 100% clear that the person is guilty -- example Parkland shooting
3. Should be done quickly. None of this years of appeal.

Those who say it is wrong = subjective. Those who say it costs too much = fix it so it does not. I don't see how you can be anti death penalty but pro choice? It makes you a hypocrite IMO. I am pro choice for the reasons we discussed. But I am also 100% pro death penatly in certain situations.

Now I have to address this: "Too much risk of an innocent death". That is true in war as well so should we NEVER ever go to war? Of course not. Sometimes there are consquences.

I agree with this, if we MUST do it then it should only.be in situations with 100% confidence.

https://www.amnestyusa.org/issues/death-penalty/death-penalty-facts/death-penalty-cost/

North Dakota is NOT every state.

Posted by rsp777 on 2/15/2019 12:27:00 PM (view original):
Establish a “Guilt Beyond All Doubt” verdict with strict eligibility and conviction guidelines based on severity of crime and removal of ALL doubt of guilt. Line ‘em up and kill ‘em all if you are you are convicted under said new guidelines. No appeals, no waiting in line for the gallows. Straight up justice served cold. Kill and be killed. End of problem.

I agree with the parasite

let dog eat dog.

Not a fan of redemptive violence, kinda goes against my religion.

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/14/2019 7:45:00 PM (view original):
Wait, you think exercise makes you fat? Exercise is good for you, you know that right? Exercise also doesn’t impair your judgement so you don’t end up eating three whoppers. Pot impacts your judgement. You know that, right? So there should be a warning that pot may impair your judgment and cause you to gain weight as a possible side effect. That would be helpful. You know that right?

wait! aren't you always telling BL not to start his posts with wait?

Posted by all3 on 2/15/2019 9:21:00 AM (view original):
All I have to say about this is that anyone who is willing to kill an innocent child inside it's mother should certainly be willing to kill a POS that has already cost society enough time, suffering and money to be convicted for life.

and anyone who says all life is sacred should be against the death penalty for that very reason.

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/15/2019 10:39:00 AM (view original):

1. I am 100% for it.
2. It should be 100% clear that the person is guilty -- example Parkland shooting
3. Should be done quickly. None of this years of appeal.

Those who say it is wrong = subjective. Those who say it costs too much = fix it so it does not. I don't see how you can be anti death penalty but pro choice? It makes you a hypocrite IMO. I am pro choice for the reasons we discussed. But I am also 100% pro death penatly in certain situations.

Now I have to address this: "Too much risk of an innocent death". That is true in war as well so should we NEVER ever go to war? Of course not. Sometimes there are consquences.

so, someone who is pro life and pro death penalty (like a large number of conservatives) isn't being hypocritical? After all, all life is sacred, right?

Posted by wylie715 on 2/15/2019 1:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/14/2019 7:45:00 PM (view original):
Wait, you think exercise makes you fat? Exercise is good for you, you know that right? Exercise also doesn’t impair your judgement so you don’t end up eating three whoppers. Pot impacts your judgement. You know that, right? So there should be a warning that pot may impair your judgment and cause you to gain weight as a possible side effect. That would be helpful. You know that right?

wait! aren't you always telling BL not to start his posts with wait?

Sarcasm 101

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/14/2019 7:45:00 PM (view original):
Wait, you think exercise makes you fat? Exercise is good for you, you know that right? Exercise also doesn’t impair your judgement so you don’t end up eating three whoppers. Pot impacts your judgement. You know that, right? So there should be a warning that pot may impair your judgment and cause you to gain weight as a possible side effect. That would be helpful. You know that right?

Exercise, like weed, can make you hungry. If you get hungry you might eat more than you need and get fat. Same logic as your warning for weed.

Posted by wylie715 on 2/15/2019 1:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/15/2019 10:39:00 AM (view original):

1. I am 100% for it.
2. It should be 100% clear that the person is guilty -- example Parkland shooting
3. Should be done quickly. None of this years of appeal.

Those who say it is wrong = subjective. Those who say it costs too much = fix it so it does not. I don't see how you can be anti death penalty but pro choice? It makes you a hypocrite IMO. I am pro choice for the reasons we discussed. But I am also 100% pro death penatly in certain situations.

Now I have to address this: "Too much risk of an innocent death". That is true in war as well so should we NEVER ever go to war? Of course not. Sometimes there are consquences.

so, someone who is pro life and pro death penalty (like a large number of conservatives) isn't being hypocritical? After all, all life is sacred, right?

I honestly haven't formed a solid opinion yet on the death penalty, but you can be pro-life and pro-death penalty without being hypocritical. The unborn baby is an innocent life. The convicted killer isn't so innocent (assuming he's not falsely convicted).