Posted by cccp1014 on 3/3/2019 11:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dino27 on 3/3/2019 11:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 3/3/2019 10:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dino27 on 3/3/2019 10:19:00 PM (view original):
i dont like omar and tlaib either...despise omar dont know as much about tlaib....probably despise her too....there are way more bad people on the republican side..way way more.
how come you dont find republicans you should label unamerican.

I'll do it for you. The Republican party is a crappy party who pretend to be for freedom and liberty, but really are only in office for personal gain. There are good ones, but like the Dems, the majority are crappy. They nominated a presidential candidate that doesn't have an ounce of character and the majority defend him at every turn. He has done some good, but that doesn't excuse the fact that he's a piece of crap person.

read this cccp...any comments.

I disagree with KO. Unlike you Leftists I dont agree blindly with what KO says. I wish DJT was even more harsh toward the biased Media and the hateful Left who are still butthurt that he won. Trump 2020 and Ben Shapiro 2024.

GOP is the party of capitalism. The Democrats started the KKK and were behind Jim Crow.

Then the parties switched. Or did you miss that part in history class?

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/3/2019 11:50:00 PM (view original):
No I did not. Some social media here and there but mostly unchecked. I am Happy to vote for Dan Crenshaw if Shapiro doesn’t run in 2024

Crenshaw is a good man.

Hillary has a new target to blame her loss on. She is now saying the supreme court cost her the election. She is a joke. How does she not realize that she was ****** candidate? That is like 20 different things now that she has blamed for her loss, but none of the 20 by her own doing. Her list runs from Jill Stein to the Supreme Court. What an idiot she is.

Posted by strikeout26 on 3/4/2019 9:16:00 AM (view original):
Topic of the day: Free Speech; Should there be limits? Why or why not?

Idk. Maybe.

Lol. I love how you answer with conviction. You make me proud, Tang!

Walking a tightrope. Like a true politician.

The correct politician answer would have been to deflect.

"Speech doesn't cost any money, but what does cost money are the social programs. Those are not free. We can freely discuss them, but the implementation will cost money. So, to answer your question Bob, Welfare is more expensive than speech."

Posted by strikeout26 on 3/4/2019 9:16:00 AM (view original):
Topic of the day: Free Speech; Should there be limits? Why or why not?

There are some limits on free speech for good reason. You can’t threaten people, you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater, you can’t cause harm (libel/slander).

Other than that, free speech is pretty broad and unrestricted.

So, do you think "speech is violence" as you hear so many say?

As far as your response, I agree with you.

ear plugs

what total crap this idea that name calling is bullying

the girl who told her boyfriend he should kill himself

same as Son of Sam saying his dog made him do it

Posted by strikeout26 on 3/4/2019 10:12:00 AM (view original):
So, do you think "speech is violence" as you hear so many say?

As far as your response, I agree with you.

Not really. I think it’s perfectly reasonable to hold people accountable for ****** things they say, shaming, complaining, boycotting etc. are also part of free speech.

I agree.

I also don’t think being banned by twitter/Facebook/YouTube constitutes a violation of your free speech rights.

These days, far too many people are far too sensitive about every word everyone else says. Just relax and stop trying to interject your own intent to their words.

It is highly "interesting" that many of the same people who want to limit what others say, feel that they should be allowed to post whatever they want to social media and other internet sites. WTH? Comments heard by a handful of people in the moment are more harmful than comments for all the World to read for eternity? Another example of just how screwed-up many people's beliefs and priorities are.

Posted by bad_luck on 3/4/2019 10:23:00 AM (view original):
I also don’t think being banned by twitter/Facebook/YouTube constitutes a violation of your free speech rights.

I don't either. They are private entities. Private entities should be able to do what they want. We don't have a right to be anyone's customer.