Lets debate! Topic

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 9:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 11:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 3/11/2019 10:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 10:48:00 PM (view original):
I disagree. One of the issues he ran on, and won on, was border enforcement.

He may have lost the battle, but may still get his wall.

I don't agree with everything he says and does, but he is doing what he said he'd do. Repeal and replace is his only promise he hasn't made good on...

Most Americans had no idea what he would do. Based on his accomplishments versus his campaign promises, how will voters view him for reelection ? He is a known commodity, love him or hate him. If the economy continues on this trajectory, he may not need a change of address card for awhile.
Oh he's gonna get re-elected... democrats are incompetent.

But he hasn't made good on his promise on the wall... first off the wall isn't built, secondly, Mexico isn't paying for it.
Construction is underway. And with an improved trade deal with Mexico, they are paying for it, albeit in a roundabout way. Perception is a funny thing, ain't it?
Mexico will pay for it via remittances. Once the wall is built he will implement a 10% tax on them. At least that was his plan. Who knows now. The Democrats have turned evil. Electing devout Muslim extremists to Congress is a non-starter for me. Tang still denies that the Democrats are slowly inching toward open anti semitism.
You have no earthly idea what the Democrats are inching toward(s)......... you are biased against the name/(idea of) Democrats. Everyone on here KNOWS that.

As to Mexico, you are completely off the realm of sanity. The Trump claim that "Mexico will pay for the wall" was (and IS!) clearly bullshit! A baldfaced LIE! He (just like you) had no idea how to make Mexico pay for his wall. It was nothing more than pandering to the deplorables that vote for him out of ignorance. We HAVE walls/fences where we need them NOW! There are places where you can't build a wall. It's childish nonsense to think that a wall is the answer to our border problems! THAT concept is fodder for the doofusses that follow him on the twit thing.............

Mexico has repeatedly said STRAIGHT OUT that they will never pay for a wall. THEY don't like it, or want it, and you can't put high enough tariffs on Tequila and Kahlua to pay for the wall.
Stop it with the repeating of bullshit from the horse's *** of mindless poop/propaganda.

TRUMP LIED when he claimed he'd make Mexico pay for the wall. Simple!
He has broken his promise the MINUTE he spends our tax dollars on anything resembling his vanity project-------- that big beautiful NEW wall he talks on and on and on about.

Just why do you think HE keeps talking about it? WHO is he doing that for??
YOU?
3/12/2019 12:53 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 9:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 11:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 3/11/2019 10:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 10:48:00 PM (view original):
I disagree. One of the issues he ran on, and won on, was border enforcement.

He may have lost the battle, but may still get his wall.

I don't agree with everything he says and does, but he is doing what he said he'd do. Repeal and replace is his only promise he hasn't made good on...

Most Americans had no idea what he would do. Based on his accomplishments versus his campaign promises, how will voters view him for reelection ? He is a known commodity, love him or hate him. If the economy continues on this trajectory, he may not need a change of address card for awhile.
Oh he's gonna get re-elected... democrats are incompetent.

But he hasn't made good on his promise on the wall... first off the wall isn't built, secondly, Mexico isn't paying for it.
Construction is underway. And with an improved trade deal with Mexico, they are paying for it, albeit in a roundabout way. Perception is a funny thing, ain't it?
Mexico will pay for it via remittances. Once the wall is built he will implement a 10% tax on them. At least that was his plan. Who knows now. The Democrats have turned evil. Electing devout Muslim extremists to Congress is a non-starter for me. Tang still denies that the Democrats are slowly inching toward open anti semitism.
just because a couple of muslim women were elected, does not mean the whole democratic party is turning towards anti semitism. Of course, you can't or won't see that. As far as you are concerned, tang and I vote democratic (most of the time) and the democrats elected a couple of women who may or may not be anti semitic( from what I have read, they are surely leaning that way, but you can't beleive everything you read) so that means me and tang are anti semitic. Just like a few people waved Palestinian flags at the DNC so all democrats are supporters of Palestine. Just like your two black friends never experienced any institutional racism, therefore it doesn't exist.
3/12/2019 12:56 PM
And since when is electing a Muslim to Congress a bad thing?
3/12/2019 12:57 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 11:55:00 AM (view original):
For the US government, spending more than you take in is absolutely a sustainable course of action, as we've seen for the last 40 years.

For this specific topic, there is significantly more hypocrisy on the right.
i would say just imagine if a dime out of every dollar you made went to old stuff you already bought

the thing about bankruptcy when you're the USA is there is no bankruptcy court to reset your debt to zero

i think it'd be kinda a debtors prison where we go from top dog to canada and mexico and china's b*tch

canada has no debt, mexico wants their caliphate back, and china will be our lender of last resort

the dollar will fall by the wayside
3/12/2019 12:58 PM
In Arizona, with the exception of the Navajo Nation portion of the state, we don't do the whole DST thing. And we'd NEVER go along with having DST all year long, but I'm quite sure we couldn't give a flying you know what what the rest of you do.

We don't want an extra hour of light in the evening!! We want that hour in the morning when the air is cool.
Put an extra hour of daylight on us in June (or a LOT of the time between April and October) and in some locations it might not fall under 100 degrees before 2 AM!

I can't imagine how much extra energy would be expended if it stayed light (that means HOT much of the year) an extra hour.
Millions of AC units working that much longer and harder all over Phoenix and Tucson.
Nope........ never gonna happen!
3/12/2019 1:03 PM
Posted by laramiebob on 3/12/2019 1:03:00 PM (view original):
In Arizona, with the exception of the Navajo Nation portion of the state, we don't do the whole DST thing. And we'd NEVER go along with having DST all year long, but I'm quite sure we couldn't give a flying you know what what the rest of you do.

We don't want an extra hour of light in the evening!! We want that hour in the morning when the air is cool.
Put an extra hour of daylight on us in June (or a LOT of the time between April and October) and in some locations it might not fall under 100 degrees before 2 AM!

I can't imagine how much extra energy would be expended if it stayed light (that means HOT much of the year) an extra hour.
Millions of AC units working that much longer and harder all over Phoenix and Tucson.
Nope........ never gonna happen!
You realize that time doesn't actually change how long the sun is out, right?
3/12/2019 1:04 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 3/12/2019 12:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 9:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 11:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 3/11/2019 10:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 10:48:00 PM (view original):
I disagree. One of the issues he ran on, and won on, was border enforcement.

He may have lost the battle, but may still get his wall.

I don't agree with everything he says and does, but he is doing what he said he'd do. Repeal and replace is his only promise he hasn't made good on...

Most Americans had no idea what he would do. Based on his accomplishments versus his campaign promises, how will voters view him for reelection ? He is a known commodity, love him or hate him. If the economy continues on this trajectory, he may not need a change of address card for awhile.
Oh he's gonna get re-elected... democrats are incompetent.

But he hasn't made good on his promise on the wall... first off the wall isn't built, secondly, Mexico isn't paying for it.
Construction is underway. And with an improved trade deal with Mexico, they are paying for it, albeit in a roundabout way. Perception is a funny thing, ain't it?
Mexico will pay for it via remittances. Once the wall is built he will implement a 10% tax on them. At least that was his plan. Who knows now. The Democrats have turned evil. Electing devout Muslim extremists to Congress is a non-starter for me. Tang still denies that the Democrats are slowly inching toward open anti semitism.
just because a couple of muslim women were elected, does not mean the whole democratic party is turning towards anti semitism. Of course, you can't or won't see that. As far as you are concerned, tang and I vote democratic (most of the time) and the democrats elected a couple of women who may or may not be anti semitic( from what I have read, they are surely leaning that way, but you can't beleive everything you read) so that means me and tang are anti semitic. Just like a few people waved Palestinian flags at the DNC so all democrats are supporters of Palestine. Just like your two black friends never experienced any institutional racism, therefore it doesn't exist.
#1) Started with the Palestinian flag at the DNC. You said oh its nothing.
#2) Now we have devout Muslim extremists in Congress with openly antisemitic verbiage and actions. You say oh its nothing.

When will it be something?
3/12/2019 1:15 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 12:57:00 PM (view original):
And since when is electing a Muslim to Congress a bad thing?
electing devout Muslim extremists

3/12/2019 1:15 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 1:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 12:57:00 PM (view original):
And since when is electing a Muslim to Congress a bad thing?
electing devout Muslim extremists

1) being devout religiously doesn't disqualify someone from serving in Congress
2) What is extreme about these two?
3/12/2019 1:18 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 1:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 1:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 12:57:00 PM (view original):
And since when is electing a Muslim to Congress a bad thing?
electing devout Muslim extremists

1) being devout religiously doesn't disqualify someone from serving in Congress
2) What is extreme about these two?
1) Never said it should DQ them
2) Google it. It is all the talk of your party.

3/12/2019 1:23 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 3/12/2019 12:48:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 11:01:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 3/11/2019 10:59:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 10:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ncmusician_7 on 3/11/2019 10:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DoctorKz on 3/11/2019 10:48:00 PM (view original):
I disagree. One of the issues he ran on, and won on, was border enforcement.

He may have lost the battle, but may still get his wall.

I don't agree with everything he says and does, but he is doing what he said he'd do. Repeal and replace is his only promise he hasn't made good on...

Most Americans had no idea what he would do. Based on his accomplishments versus his campaign promises, how will voters view him for reelection ? He is a known commodity, love him or hate him. If the economy continues on this trajectory, he may not need a change of address card for awhile.
He is going the wrong way on -eliminating the debt-.
True. His OMB chief addressed that today. They are looking to reverse that. Spending is still too high. And they could eliminate some of the loopholes that the wealthy take great advantage of. They could tweak rates on the wealthy. But it is a concern. In 2015, Trump said 24T was the over the falls number...

Funny how the Left are concerned now, they didn't give a rat's *** as Obama drove it up through the clouds...

And they could eliminate some of the loopholes that the wealthy take great advantage of. They could tweak rates on the wealthy.

ha! ha ha! Trump? Doing that? lol

He IS on record as saying that he is open to it.
he is on record saying a lot of things. Many of those things he says turn out to be complete bullshit.
Sounds a lot like most politicians.
3/12/2019 1:24 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 1:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 1:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 12:57:00 PM (view original):
And since when is electing a Muslim to Congress a bad thing?
electing devout Muslim extremists

1) being devout religiously doesn't disqualify someone from serving in Congress
2) What is extreme about these two?
1) Never said it should DQ them
2) Google it. It is all the talk of your party.

I'm not your researcher. If you want to claim they are extreme, it should be pretty easy for you to find the extreme things they have done.

Until you do, I'm going to assume you don't know what you are talking about...again.
3/12/2019 1:25 PM
Comrade cccp is just a brighter version of swamphawk and winnepeggy
3/12/2019 1:28 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 1:25:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 1:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 1:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/12/2019 1:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 3/12/2019 12:57:00 PM (view original):
And since when is electing a Muslim to Congress a bad thing?
electing devout Muslim extremists

1) being devout religiously doesn't disqualify someone from serving in Congress
2) What is extreme about these two?
1) Never said it should DQ them
2) Google it. It is all the talk of your party.

I'm not your researcher. If you want to claim they are extreme, it should be pretty easy for you to find the extreme things they have done.

Until you do, I'm going to assume you don't know what you are talking about...again.
When you assume you make an *** out of you and me. Since you're already one it matters little to you and if you don't know current events I am not going to post them for you. LOL.

That would be like me saying the Red Sox won the 2018 WS and you demanding I post links and proof.
3/12/2019 1:31 PM
Um, ok, great. We'll operate under the assumption that there are no Muslim extremists in congress.
3/12/2019 2:01 PM
◂ Prev 1...197|198|199|200|201...229 Next ▸
Lets debate! Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.