Posted by tangplay on 8/26/2019 10:46:00 PM (view original):
The DNC doesn't want Tulsi to win for the same reason that Republicans didn't want Ron Paul to win 8 years ago.

Interesting

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/26/2019 10:36:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/26/2019 10:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/26/2019 1:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 8/23/2019 4:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/23/2019 12:26:00 PM (view original):
I find it comical that the Democrats have pushed out Tulsi. She doesn't fit their narrative of being a strong woman, with a military background and fairly conservative fiscal and foreign policy ideas while liberal on social policies. She would get my vote in a second and should be the face of that party not AOC.

Democrats are so F*CKING stupid.

Why would Dems nominate someone with fairly conservative ideas? They aren’t trying to appeal to you, Trump supporter.

True as I live in MA. But if she appeals to me she must appeal to others who may think like me in swing states.

Again, regardless of the state you live in, Dems aren’t trying to appeal to you. You are a Trump supporter.

I just told you I would vote for Tulsi. I am not beholden to any party. Do you only see what you want to see?

You, a single voter, might vote for Tulsi. At the same time, if Tulsi were to get the nomination, a huge chunk of actual Democrats would probably stay home on Election Day.

Get it?

That's probably not true.

Tulsi has progressive chops, to the point where a Sanders supporter like myself can also like her.

I'd vote for Kasich over Assad's *****
Gabbard vs. Trump?

I'd stay home.

Posted by tangplay on 8/27/2019 12:17:00 AM (view original):
That's probably not true.

Tulsi has progressive chops, to the point where a Sanders supporter like myself can also like her.

So, I first say that if I feel like I can flip to a Democrat vote for Tulsi then likely there are others, especially in swing states. bad luck ignores that and says she would only get my vote. He thinks people would stay home for her but turn out in droves for HRC 2.0, Elizabeth Warren.

Smh

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2019/7/30/20691246/elizabeth-warren-massachusetts-unpopular

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/27/2019 7:18:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 8/27/2019 12:17:00 AM (view original):
That's probably not true.

Tulsi has progressive chops, to the point where a Sanders supporter like myself can also like her.

So, I first say that if I feel like I can flip to a Democrat vote for Tulsi then likely there are others, especially in swing states. bad luck ignores that and says she would only get my vote. He thinks people would stay home for her but turn out in droves for HRC 2.0, Elizabeth Warren.

Smh

Gabbard supports medicare for all.

Posted by gomiami1972 on 8/27/2019 7:30:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/27/2019 7:18:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 8/27/2019 12:17:00 AM (view original):
That's probably not true.

Tulsi has progressive chops, to the point where a Sanders supporter like myself can also like her.

So, I first say that if I feel like I can flip to a Democrat vote for Tulsi then likely there are others, especially in swing states. bad luck ignores that and says she would only get my vote. He thinks people would stay home for her but turn out in droves for HRC 2.0, Elizabeth Warren.

Smh

Gabbard supports medicare for all.

While maintaining the private option for those
that want it

Let BC stay home!!! He won't anyway. I am a genuine Independent HOPING to be able to vote for a Democrat this time (2020) to defeat someone I feel is completely morally unfit to be POTUS! There are literally millions like me. I CAN NOT vote for Sanders or Warren (or Harris or Booker) and IF the Dems choose someone I can't vote for, I will (once again) vote for a "minor" party candidate as I have in many Presidential elections.
There are many many more voters like me, not so many like BC with some kind of weird anti Semitic opposition to Gabbard.

Wanna WIN and turn Trump out.

TULSI in 2020

Posted by laramiebob on 8/27/2019 9:03:00 AM (view original):
Let BC stay home!!! He won't anyway. I am a genuine Independent HOPING to be able to vote for a Democrat this time (2020) to defeat someone I feel is completely morally unfit to be POTUS! There are literally millions like me. I CAN NOT vote for Sanders or Warren (or Harris or Booker) and IF the Dems choose someone I can't vote for, I will (once again) vote for a "minor" party candidate as I have in many Presidential elections.
There are many many more voters like me, not so many like BC with some kind of weird anti Semitic opposition to Gabbard.

Wanna WIN and turn Trump out.

TULSI in 2020

According to bad luck, I am the only person who would vote for Tulsi so she is not worth running.

Posted by tangplay on 8/27/2019 12:17:00 AM (view original):
That's probably not true.

Tulsi has progressive chops, to the point where a Sanders supporter like myself can also like her.

Gabbard is a fake progressive. Her record in congress isn’t progressive at all.

If you want a real progressive you should support Sanders or Warren.

Posted by cccp1014 on 8/27/2019 9:24:00 AM (view original):

Posted by laramiebob on 8/27/2019 9:03:00 AM (view original):
Let BC stay home!!! He won't anyway. I am a genuine Independent HOPING to be able to vote for a Democrat this time (2020) to defeat someone I feel is completely morally unfit to be POTUS! There are literally millions like me. I CAN NOT vote for Sanders or Warren (or Harris or Booker) and IF the Dems choose someone I can't vote for, I will (once again) vote for a "minor" party candidate as I have in many Presidential elections.
There are many many more voters like me, not so many like BC with some kind of weird anti Semitic opposition to Gabbard.

Wanna WIN and turn Trump out.

TULSI in 2020

According to bad luck, I am the only person who would vote for Tulsi so she is not worth running.

She’s polling at 1%.

Posted by bad_luck on 8/27/2019 9:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 8/27/2019 12:17:00 AM (view original):
That's probably not true.

Tulsi has progressive chops, to the point where a Sanders supporter like myself can also like her.

Gabbard is a fake progressive. Her record in congress isn’t progressive at all.

If you want a real progressive you should support Sanders or Warren.

I believe this is dead on. Gabbard is not a progressive, she is a liberal...and there is still a distinction (although fading) between those two terms.

Posted by laramiebob on 8/27/2019 11:27:00 AM (view original):
I take no issues with the labels as you have termed it. Nor do I really care about labels. Liberal is NOT a dirty word to this Independent.

IF the only real progressives are Warren and Sanders and either of them win the dem. nomination you are ensuring Trump's re-election. The heartland will NOT vote for a shrill Progressive, NOR a Socialist Democrat. You might win the popular vote (again) but you will LOSE the Electoral college.

The BIGGEST question of the 2020 election is whether or NOT the dems. learned anything at all from the HRC defeat. Obviously BC learned nothing.

CCCP wants to pretend like he'd vote for Gabbard. He wouldn't. Neither would all the other 8chan retards. There's a reason they (and Trump) are pushing for her to get the Nomination.

And you want to pretend that a Sanders-supporting, progressive, Hindu from Hawaii is the key to white, working-class voters in Pennsylvania and Michigan. That's nuts.

The mistake of 2016 was the DOJ not going public with the Trump investigation while going public with the Clinton investigation. That was probably enough to tilt the tiny margin of victory in PA, MI, and WI to Trump and give him the presidency. If you're afraid of an unelectable candidate getting the nomination, you should not be supporting Gabbard.