Posted by Guitarguy567 on 6/11/2020 8:41:00 AM (view original):
What were these comments (microagressions) that were found to be so offensive? Were they legitimately offensive, or offensive to only the most sensitive SJW's?
I personally don't know. They allegedly happened at Loyola. Then once the "issue" surfaced, at that point many ASU professors (and perhaps others) ALSO publicly complained about the "candidate's" behavior and attitude while here at ASU (not very long).
The original complaints had to do with "splaining" to POC (black women IF I'm not incorrect) that they needed to wear their hairstyles to make themselves appear "less black" if'n they wanted to actually succeed in the law business.
I interpret that as trying to "splain" to them that IF they wanted to maximize their job opportunities and career advancement likelihood that these women wannabe lawyers needed to be "aware" that wearing "fro" or going "nappy" is gonna cost them. Whiten up if'n you want to get ahead seems to be the message she advocated.
Certainly not very PC, or acceptable at this moment in time.