Yeah, I had the same problem with
this dude a while ago, and he has 13 pts less LP and 5 pts less Per. +2 at the 3 only netted me 50.4% 3pters JR year and 49.6% 3pters SR year which strikes me as ridiculous.
I've had
this guy on +2 at the 3 as well this year and he is at least shooting 72.3% threes. And he's shooting 63.6 eFG% on 2s with 18 LP at the 3 as well as 66.2% eFG% on 3s with 97 Per at the 3. So 0 complaints there, the +2 at the 3 works perfectly. I think statistically you want the eFG% on 2s higher because of the negative curve between Usage/Efficiency is steeper on 2s (especially at very low volumes that are heavily dunks/layups), but I'll take that anytime.
Also, while we're on the topic of playing 100 ath/sp/de/per/bh guards at the 3, how about Harmon having 15 fouls in 477 minutes. Jesus.
7/11/2020 12:52 PM (edited)