Posted by cccp1014 on 7/21/2020 2:01:00 PM (view original):

SimLeague Overall

Record: 20-105 (.160)

Championships: 0


Impressive for an Ivy Leaguer....

Maybe his Daddy will hire someone to run his SIM teams for him. Spoiled little delusional rich kid whining about people being privileged. Priceless.

There are Republican nominees for Congress who believe in a Democratic sex-trafficking pedophile ring and a deep state that Trump is trying to take down.

The El Paso shooter, Tree of Life, that guy sending bombs, QAnon believers running for Congress, Michael Flynn pledging to QAnon, what Trump/Barr did in Layfette Square, etc, etc

"undeniably more extremists on the left." unreal.

social media is not real life, boomer.

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/21/2020 3:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/21/2020 3:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dahsdebater on 7/21/2020 2:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/21/2020 9:31:00 AM (view original):
Or we could vote for the Party containing people who want to abolish police, open boarders and hand-out things for "free" left and right.
Now THAT would be STUPID!!

You can do that for either party.

You clearly want to vote for the party containing people that want to exterminate the Jews, expel all non-whites from the country, and allow private citizens to own M16s and RPGs. Who cares what the fringes of the party want?

It's like tang keeps saying - unless you can pin those things on the candidate, they really aren't relevant.

Look at this site. Look at any social media site. Which "side" has more "extremists" based on that? It is undeniably the left, and it's not even close. I'm pretty sure those extremists are still a small part of the Repubs. Can't say the same for the Dems.

A Trump supporter just killed a child of a federal judge, who he was trying to kill. The acting DHS is saying the New York Times is publishing addresses to incite violence (they're not). Stephen Miller.

Divorced from reality to say there's "undeniably more extremists on the left" especially when they have no power, unlike on the right. The difference is you're fine with the right's extremists.

I'm NOT fine with any extremists. You continuing to try to make BS assertions about me is getting really old.
You keep making assumptions about me and proving the old adage correct.

Posted by tangplay on 7/21/2020 3:35:00 PM (view original):
There are Republican nominees for Congress who believe in a Democratic sex-trafficking pedophile ring and a deep state that Trump is trying to take down.

Trump and Mueller are taking down. And JFK Jr. is alive.

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/21/2020 3:37:00 PM (view original):
The El Paso shooter, Tree of Life, that guy sending bombs, QAnon believers running for Congress, Michael Flynn pledging to QAnon, what Trump/Barr did in Layfette Square, etc, etc

"undeniably more extremists on the left." unreal.

social media is not real life, boomer.

Your denial of facts doesn't make it so. Those are real people posting real sentiments. As much as I truly hate social media, it is how and where people live these days.

Posted by all3 on 7/21/2020 3:37:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/21/2020 3:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/21/2020 3:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dahsdebater on 7/21/2020 2:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/21/2020 9:31:00 AM (view original):
Or we could vote for the Party containing people who want to abolish police, open boarders and hand-out things for "free" left and right.
Now THAT would be STUPID!!

You can do that for either party.

You clearly want to vote for the party containing people that want to exterminate the Jews, expel all non-whites from the country, and allow private citizens to own M16s and RPGs. Who cares what the fringes of the party want?

It's like tang keeps saying - unless you can pin those things on the candidate, they really aren't relevant.

Look at this site. Look at any social media site. Which "side" has more "extremists" based on that? It is undeniably the left, and it's not even close. I'm pretty sure those extremists are still a small part of the Repubs. Can't say the same for the Dems.

A Trump supporter just killed a child of a federal judge, who he was trying to kill. The acting DHS is saying the New York Times is publishing addresses to incite violence (they're not). Stephen Miller.

Divorced from reality to say there's "undeniably more extremists on the left" especially when they have no power, unlike on the right. The difference is you're fine with the right's extremists.

I'm NOT fine with any extremists. You continuing to try to make BS assertions about me is getting really old.
You keep making assumptions about me and proving the old adage correct.

Based on months and months of your posts, it's clear what you're fine with.

Posted by all3 on 7/21/2020 3:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 7/21/2020 3:37:00 PM (view original):
The El Paso shooter, Tree of Life, that guy sending bombs, QAnon believers running for Congress, Michael Flynn pledging to QAnon, what Trump/Barr did in Layfette Square, etc, etc

"undeniably more extremists on the left." unreal.

social media is not real life, boomer.

Your denial of facts doesn't make it so. Those are real people posting real sentiments. As much as I truly hate social media, it is how and where people live these days.

.....wow.....

great rebuttal, dude.

You have no freakin' clue about me or my life. If you think I'm OK with extremist or racist actions of any kind I can't change that opinion, but I don't really care, since those who do know me know the truth and see it in how I live.

Let's not get derailed. All3's argument is that he won't vote for Joe Biden because some people on social media said that they want to abolish the police.

Yup. Sound logic............ for someone willing to buy Trump as fit to lead his "challenged" flock on even a burger run to McDonalds.

All3 can't escape the lunacy of his core argument, so he HAS to pivot away to other issues, like whether or not he's fine with white nationalists. Don't let him do that.

Would I take Biden over Trump if it was strictly one-on-one? Quite possibly, but it isn't one-on-one, it's Party vs. Party, because as much as any of us hate it, that IS the way today's politics work.

Whatever tang posted, I highly doubt it was "sound logic", and I'm sure it wasn't close to entirely true, as he loves to twist things even more than Uofa. He's just not worth reading.

There's the core of the argument. It's ******* ridiculous. Uofa, dahs, y'all want to take a swipe at the Party vs Party argument?

Posted by tangplay on 7/21/2020 4:27:00 PM (view original):
There's the core of the argument. It's ******* ridiculous. Uofa, dahs, y'all want to take a swipe at the Party vs Party argument?

People on social media saying things 98% of democrats aren’t implementing is worse and more extreme than Trump’s party, attorney general, and supporters. Checks out, yeah.

This is insane, of course.