Let's see if I have this correct. People here want to forgive and ignore the 10% of "protesters" who are actually looters and destroyers because the other 90% are "good", but they want to crucify the .1% of white police who have shot an unarmed black man, in spite of the 99.9% who haven't.
Now I know that shooting a man ruins lives much quicker, but it could be argued that the looting and destruction ruins many more lives in the long run. How is 10% ok, but .1% not? (Both would ideally be 0%.)