Posted by mtnwild on 10/9/2020 11:32:00 AM (view original):
I mean, I don't even see this guy being drafted this season (maybe next year if he stayed): Brian Bicknell
This player is actually a really instructive example, looking more closely. He is top 20 by position as a recruit (not an actual standard, but another good rule of thumb), he has an elite skill - distributing, with high 90s speed and passing, he’s a fairly good scorer with LP+per nearing the 140 mark, and his physical/defense cores are passable, if not excellent. His OVR is deceiving because of his low durability, which the system ignores just like we do - if he had 50 durability, his OVR would be over 800.
I’d ignore the snarky comment about holding back his defense or speed, but there is an important player development issue to think about, related to those key areas above, specifically the scoring attributes. Did you really need those extra 7 points of LP this season? How much value did they add to your team in the postseason? My suspicion is if you would have held off developing LP until his senior season, he would have been safe.
So the next question is usually “but how was I supposed to know he was that close if he wasn’t on the Big Board?” And that’s kind of the point. The Big Board isn’t supposed to be a substitute for your player evaluation skills. With experience, a coach should be able to gauge whether or not a player they recruit *might* leave early without the Big Board, which is an evaluation tool, not an outcome.
10/9/2020 2:13 PM (edited)