Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

This part of the world schedule really breaks the game momentum. Speaking of development updates that should be quick and easy to make... Why do we need 4 hours between the team renewal deadline and applications starting?

We definitely don’t need 69 hours for jobs changes. 48 hrs should be enough.
12/12/2020 10:36 PM
Posted by craigaltonw on 12/12/2020 10:36:00 PM (view original):
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

This part of the world schedule really breaks the game momentum. Speaking of development updates that should be quick and easy to make... Why do we need 4 hours between the team renewal deadline and applications starting?

We definitely don’t need 69 hours for jobs changes. 48 hrs should be enough.
Preach!
12/13/2020 1:11 AM
I would remind you that this is also when coaches (with previous experience) can come in from not playing. And if you get denied a job (multiple coaches apply). you need time to apply for another job. I am ok to speed it up, just that you need time to apply for and maybe reapply up to 4 times.
12/13/2020 7:09 AM
Side note-- interesting in Crum-- this offseason going into Season 117 we have new Div-1 coaches at UCLA, Ohio State, UConn, Rhode Island, USC, Gonzaga, Ole Miss, Temple, Army, Boston U, Marquette, Richmond, UC Riverside... may have forgotten some. Huge changes.
12/13/2020 9:11 AM
If we cut the time down (which I'm all for), I'd LOVE to see an option where a coach could apply to multiple jobs at a time and rank them from 1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice, etc. Right now if you apply for 4 jobs at once you'll get assigned one randomly. Applying for multiple at once and ranking them means you wouldn't have to log back in every few hours to re-apply for a new job (say, your third choice), if you were denied your first and second choices.
12/13/2020 10:09 AM
Posted by darnoc29099 on 12/13/2020 10:09:00 AM (view original):
If we cut the time down (which I'm all for), I'd LOVE to see an option where a coach could apply to multiple jobs at a time and rank them from 1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice, etc. Right now if you apply for 4 jobs at once you'll get assigned one randomly. Applying for multiple at once and ranking them means you wouldn't have to log back in every few hours to re-apply for a new job (say, your third choice), if you were denied your first and second choices.
Yeah, I'm with Darnoc. I honestly think in the current system 3 days is probably a good idea...
12/13/2020 11:19 AM
Posted by cubcub113 on 12/13/2020 11:19:00 AM (view original):
Posted by darnoc29099 on 12/13/2020 10:09:00 AM (view original):
If we cut the time down (which I'm all for), I'd LOVE to see an option where a coach could apply to multiple jobs at a time and rank them from 1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice, etc. Right now if you apply for 4 jobs at once you'll get assigned one randomly. Applying for multiple at once and ranking them means you wouldn't have to log back in every few hours to re-apply for a new job (say, your third choice), if you were denied your first and second choices.
Yeah, I'm with Darnoc. I honestly think in the current system 3 days is probably a good idea...
Me too.. If we could do that, we could indeed speed it up.
12/13/2020 1:17 PM
Posted by npb7768 on 12/13/2020 9:11:00 AM (view original):
Side note-- interesting in Crum-- this offseason going into Season 117 we have new Div-1 coaches at UCLA, Ohio State, UConn, Rhode Island, USC, Gonzaga, Ole Miss, Temple, Army, Boston U, Marquette, Richmond, UC Riverside... may have forgotten some. Huge changes.
Crum is my case in point.

It’s the biggest carousel shift of coaches I’ve witnessed in playing HD. Also, changes happened at multiple big name schools. When you look at the activity in the last 24 hours, crickets... These huge shifts and assumed multiple application choices all happened basically within the first 48 hours. Did every coach get the job he wanted? No. Some stayed put. Some took a 3rd choice.

Annnnd... I’ll say it louder, the jobs cycle takes too long! The time gap between RS1 and RS2 is too long. Let’s poll new users about the effects to their interest levels in continuing with the game while they watch vets compete for titles and then twiddle their thumbs during job changes waiting for RS2.

Sure, let’s implement applying for prioritized jobs at once. Move it along.
12/13/2020 1:47 PM
Seems like "unprecedented carousel movement" could be the new norm with the shift to making it easier to advance...

So my only concern here would be that once we adjust to this type of movement at the top of D1, do we need time for the 2nd & maybe 3rd clusters of dominoes to fall? I.e. the coaches who are new at UCLA, Ohio State, UConn, etc. presumably left good teams behind. Could the lack of movement after those changes be due to lower coaches not expecting so many good schools (presumably lower D1 and good D2) to now be both open and available to them?

I just applied to a job I'm def. not qualified for in Tark, but I'm expecting that if a more qualified coach gets it then I will take a look at the school he's leaving. I was able to jump from D3 to D2 in Tark after only 1 season (I assume with the other new job logic changes they also now consider your overall experience instead of only your experience in that world), and because I didn't expect to get a D2 job I didn't take any time to make sure I applied to good D2s (that's my excuse for my 3-24 season!).

With the new career logic, I think it definitely makes the most sense to bail on this team rather than go the slow/painful/rewarding rebuild route.
(especially since the slow/painful rebuild in Tark will hurt my overall W/L record and I'm assuming that will also hurt my chances of getting a good D1 job in another world).
3/22/2021 4:50 PM
Posted by bigham23 on 3/22/2021 4:51:00 PM (view original):
Seems like "unprecedented carousel movement" could be the new norm with the shift to making it easier to advance...

So my only concern here would be that once we adjust to this type of movement at the top of D1, do we need time for the 2nd & maybe 3rd clusters of dominoes to fall? I.e. the coaches who are new at UCLA, Ohio State, UConn, etc. presumably left good teams behind. Could the lack of movement after those changes be due to lower coaches not expecting so many good schools (presumably lower D1 and good D2) to now be both open and available to them?

I just applied to a job I'm def. not qualified for in Tark, but I'm expecting that if a more qualified coach gets it then I will take a look at the school he's leaving. I was able to jump from D3 to D2 in Tark after only 1 season (I assume with the other new job logic changes they also now consider your overall experience instead of only your experience in that world), and because I didn't expect to get a D2 job I didn't take any time to make sure I applied to good D2s (that's my excuse for my 3-24 season!).

With the new career logic, I think it definitely makes the most sense to bail on this team rather than go the slow/painful/rewarding rebuild route.
(especially since the slow/painful rebuild in Tark will hurt my overall W/L record and I'm assuming that will also hurt my chances of getting a good D1 job in another world).
to you final point, your success (or lack thereof) in one world has no impact on the jobs process in the others. you basically have 10 distinct, unrelated resumes, one per world.
3/22/2021 5:09 PM
One thing I dont understand is if you apply for a job (and not right at the end of the job process) why do you have to wait 12 hours to find out? maybe if a job opened up - but not one thats been a SIM since version 1.0!
3/22/2021 7:35 PM
I don't see much of change in the jobs logic too me. Just spent a season at Missouri state, winning record, regular season conf champ. D Prestige, this is coming off of D2 4 out of 5 seasons NT 1st round and I barely qualify for C- maybe a few C jobs but nothing actually good as far as programs go in Tark. I dont see the big difference everyone is talking about.

EDIT : My guess is coaches are qualifying a letter grade above them so this is heavily effecting the mid major grind coaches. The ones that took C- maybe D+ programs to B- or B jobs and now they are snagging A- or A jobs. Previously you had to wait for those programs to die. Not real mad about that if its the case. Just means I need to get Missouri state into the C range and i'll pickup a good spot.
3/22/2021 7:59 PM
I think the major difference to me is the number of jobs that I am eligible for coming from D2
3/22/2021 9:20 PM
somehow, someway, there has to be a way to make a little more casual version of HD to draw in users. recruiting outside of high d1, and probably even in high d1, requires a large number of hours to be spent to really optimize - and a lot of those in a few number of hours/days. really at any level, i think there is fairly clear and significant value to spending extra / a lot of time, whether its something like taking the extra couple hours to really carefully evaluate the recruit pool up front, or paying attention in depth each cycle - watching a meaningfully wide set of recruits for a deeper understanding of the field, your backup options, the going-ons of other teams you might bump into, and all that stuff. its also just way too hard at any level to do anything about lost dice rolls, at least without a lot of effort. at least IMO!

back in the day, there was meaningfully less recruiting competition in d2 and d3, compared to today, even with double the population and more. also, there was less watching cycle over cycle to see who was going to fall which way, where that meticulous paying attention cycle over cycle for an extended period paid real dividends. the main thing was prep work finding targets before recruiting opened, but then everyone at all levels basically jumped at the starting gun. even in d2/d3, most of your class could be more or less locked up by roughly a day in, and then not much later, signings hit, and the whole thing was quite often over. as a side note, this also helped keep the between-seasons period from getting TOO boring, although it still was for NT/jobs, because at least you had all of recruiting in there.

as a result, d2/d3 served as a refuge of sorts, for folks who just didn't want to fight for every inch, while d1 you had the more vigorous recruiting competition - so folks had a choice. also high d1 without the coin flips and all, it was probably a lot easier to coast there, so probably easier at all levels really to invest moderate time. and i'm not saying the changes are bad - because having all of recruiting end so quick for so many folks obviously had its downsides. but i do think its a lot harder to coast in recruiting today, and if you need to be checking every cycle for days, it really seems like in today's world, that should roughly be smart phone workable - and checking recruit progress for 25-50 guys every 6 hours for 4 days on a phone definitely isn't that. not necessarily everywhere - but at least somewhere in HD!

anyway, my point is this - this game takes quite a bit of effort - between recruiting, scheduling, practice planning... stuff that is both a lot for new coaches, and for a lot of reasonably tenured folks. i think there needs to be a version that is more accessible and casual, and not just for rookies. i think a full-effort version that is basically today's d1 makes sense, but i also think there fundamentally has to be a HD-lite somewhere in HD that is fun and compelling, but requires less effort, or at least penalizes less harshly for less effort. seble was aiming in that direction to some extent, but i think we actually went the other way - again, not complaining.

but really what i was aiming at, is i think RS2 needs to be a real session, to help with that in between period. maybe even have new recruits that nobody is already on, that come out after the first NT weekend or something, so folks have something to do. its bad enough the NT and jobs takes forever, but then it is bookended with a RS2 that is a significantly sub-par session for a lot of d1 teams, many of whom try their best to do the absolute minimum in RS2, and its awful for everyone in their 1st season everywhere. having most of the d2/d3 community waiting till RS2 to actually start signing players makes no sense to me either, that is just way too much time to spend preparing, and too little time spent signing. if d2 is that way, fine, but its TERRIBLE preparation for how d1 works, and its so inaccessible, so hard for new coaches to walk in and do well without investing a ton of effort.

but i'm fuzzy on a bunch of this, because i think there has to be a rethink somewhere. for example, i don't know that having 1 recruit pool and style for d1 and d2/d3 makes any sense, and frankly, i think its substantially the opposite. maybe have 1 division like d2 work like d2/d3, but have d3 actually distinct, with a much higher ratio of recruits to humans, so it is a lot less competition. d3 folks should only recruit from an exclusive d3 pool (no dipping down either), one which generates quality recruits in part in proportion with the human coaches instead of just total openings like now, and one which features an ample selection of solid, good, and very good players that are easy to pick up late in recruiting. but whatever the case - i think both RS2 needs a rethink, because it just sucks, but also just something needs to be done to make recruiting more casual for some segments of HD at least. that doesn't necessarily mean dumbing it down, but making it a little less brutal - a rough RS1 is just like, brutal for a newer d1 coach. RS2 should offer some path to redemption. so anyway, i kinda think the two issues are linked, the RS2 issues and the challenges with recruiting for both more casual and newer coaches.

lastly, i think the jobs change was the right spirit but not exactly ideal - i would have went for something more like, anyone - even someone with 0 experience in a world - can take any job up to d+ d1 or so. then any experience in the world unlocks higher levels of team, but making sure that decent low d1 success gives low d1 coaches a better shot than d2/d3 coaches with significantly more success on an objective basis. this way folks who slog through low d1 up to a b-/b don't get super frustrated by getting jumped over. and also nobody is forced into today's d2/d3, which some folks really like, but which is an absolute nightmare (bc of recruiting format) to many others. which division to play in should be a choice. i actually think a lot of new coaches would pick up d1 recruiting more easily, because d2/d3 now is so dependent on understanding who is likely to fall through, which you really have to watch carefully for a long time to start getting a hang of. sure, low d1 has this too, but at least you can start fighting from the gate and start getting feedback, none of this sitting around watching for all of RS1 and maybe some of RS2 trying to get a feel for what the heck is happening before even starting to bring in any players.
3/22/2021 11:44 PM (edited)
gillispie1: Overall great post. In particular that last paragraph is so spot on and absolutely nails it.

I feel that with this new make it easier to get to D1 push they are doing, they really need to do one thing in conjunction with it. (I think it is a good thing they are doing and think the new team programming and running WIS are a welcome breath of fresh air).

That one thing is to ramp up the firing process for D1 jobs. For the lower level D1 conferences and teams not much is needed. For the top 6 conferences and baseline prestige jobs above C+ there needs to be as transparent as possible guideline set up so there is an expectation of some success for a coach to keep a job at those schools. Make it up front that coaches moving up to the good D1 jobs know that they cannot stay there forever without some success at getting to the NT and at the highest of baseline prestige schools--a level of NT success. For example in the top 6 conferences Kentucky should have a higher expectation than Mississippi St and Michigan St should have a higher expectation than Northwestern etc. Coaches new to D1 teams should get a 3 season grace period and then the clock should start ticking. Otherwise with the number of D1 coaches coming into the game, jobs in the power 6 conferences will get very hard to get as unqualified coaches languish for 10 to 20 seasons at schools they are not succeeding at. Also give coaches that get fired their next season free. Simply let coaches new to D1 (like jumping from a D2 job into the Big 10) and current coaches already in D! know that yes you can move up much easier but there is a level of success expected after a period of time or some other coach will get a chance at that upper level D1 job.

I don't think we should call out coaches by name on here but without naming the world, in the first power 6 conference I looked at there is a coach who has been at Tennessee for 13 seasons and has never made the NT. There are many similar cases out there that need to be addressed.
3/23/2021 8:17 AM
12 Next ▸

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.