I couldn't find any data on "asking for forgiveness," but I think it's a fair assumption that people who have defaulted on their loans are more likely to want those loans forgiven.
From your argument, we would probably expect to see that business majors rarely default on their student loans, and arts/humanities majors default often. Furthermore, the fact that STEM and Vocational majors are very similar suggests that the issue is less about the specific major and more a widespread problem. How do you explain that?
Just accept that you are wrong here. No, people besides lazy arts majors have student loan problems. You said, "Business majors aren't asking for loans to be forgiven." That is clearly, demonstrably, untrue.
As for your NFL example, it shows how clueless you are. If we had a discussion about football and you brought that up, I would call you out for a small sample size and mistaking correlation for causation. We can easily look at the success of NFL players by draft round and see that first round picks, on average, fare better than later round picks. The fact that the Pats have two successful late round players is correlative to their success, not causative. Their system is really good, so they were able to make a mediocre QB like Tom Brady into appearing like an elite one, even if that was a façade.
See, you fail to realize that you are criticizing yourself here. I NEVER use anecdotes like "over the past 20 years the most successful NFL team had at least one player drafted in the 6th round or later start for them" or "the NBA is racist because it has more black players." YOU do that. I use studies, not anecdotes and statistics (for the most part). Yes, I agree. Anecdotes require context. Studies ARE that context.