I've got a 2009 prog team headed to the playoffs, and have to make a decision at the transaction deadline on which full time 3B to send down. Real life stats:
Andy LaRoche
B+/A-
.258/.330/.401/.731
Adrian Beltre
B/A
.265/.304/.379/.683
Going into the season I expected the decision would be easy: Beltre goes down. But take a gander at their SIM stats:
LaRoche
364 PA
.222/.288/.313/.602
Beltre
270 PA
.337/.356/.450/.805
I know, small sample size, and I've never believed in "poisoned" or "boosted" players, but gee whiz. That's a pretty stark contrast. They haven't been used enough to make their performance histories worth taking seriously (LaRoche used only three times, Beltre twice), but LaRoche does have the edge there.
Thoughts?