Posted by majique on 2/24/2021 2:44:00 PM (view original):
Posted by shoe3 on 2/24/2021 2:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by majique on 2/21/2021 7:09:00 PM (view original):
If 4.0 happens it will likely be its own entity and not tied to 3.0. Totally different game and will probably have a different name. Envision two college football games on WIS.
Having been around and in the middle of the HD transition to 3.0, I think this is probably the smart way to do it, assuming it’s feasible, rather than just snap the fingers and change all at once. Start with one new world. From there, you can open new worlds as demand requires. They could start transferring existing GD worlds to the new format if demand is good, and offer users credits or the opportunity to transfer rosters to an open team in another “legacy” world. Probably a good idea to keep at least a couple long term legacy worlds open, at least for the foreseeable future, until “4.0” is well established.
Gridiron Dynasty is tantalizing but frustrating. It’s close to a great game, but then there are stupid things like 100 touchdown seasons, and 300 game win streaks with no end in site, and it’s clear there are some systemic things that should be addressed, and probably require an overhaul, if they’re going to go to the trouble of getting into the coding (which is likely necessary). So I get the need. It’s the rollout that’s going to be tricky.
No worries about a "rollout", if it comes to fruition it will be a stand alone game and have ZERO impact on the current WIS GD.
Yeah, I get all that. I guess the concern is that there is sort of a zero sum kind of scarcity at work, where “4.0” will be cannibalizing the user base. If people really like it, current GD will empty further (the concern goes). What happens to existing worlds and the coaches who want to stay? I don’t know the answer to that. Maybe that’s discussed by you all, I haven’t listened to all episodes discussing this. And I’m sure that’s a source of discussion with the developers and higher-ups. In a perfect world, people have lots of disposable income and free time and will play both, but realistically a lot of us are limited in one or both, and will eventually have to make choices.
That said, I am certainly not arguing against developing this 4.0 idea. I think a new iteration of the game, with some of the core concepts (that work) still in place, but taking a new approach to some of the concepts that get gamed and gimmicked in the current version, which produces some of these absurd and unbalanced and non-competitive outcomes, I think that’s a worthy endeavor, for sure. I’m excited to hear and see more about what they’re thinking and doing.
2/24/2021 3:31 PM (edited)