I WIN MORE INNERNET ARGUMENTS THEN SDEDALUS EVER DID AND YE CAN QUOTE ME ON THAT!

Posted by kermit on 4/7/2021 8:46:00 PM (view original):
I WIN MORE INNERNET ARGUMENTS THEN SDEDALUS EVER DID AND YE CAN QUOTE ME ON THAT!

quoted

Posted by kermit on 4/7/2021 8:46:00 PM (view original):
I WIN MORE INNERNET ARGUMENTS THEN SDEDALUS EVER DID AND YE CAN QUOTE ME ON THAT!

Debate me, coward!

SDEADALU........ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/7/2021 6:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 4/7/2021 6:15:00 PM (view original):
Do you think MLB cares where the money comes from? No, they don't. Their decision was money based.
You're right...maybe the political parties should not give out food and water at polling places. I admit I haven't read the exact wording of the bill, just that it makes it illegal to give water to voters waiting online. If it specifies political parties giving out supplies I have no problem with that. If it just sayys it is illegal to give food or water to waiting voters, I do have an issue with that.

You’re not allowed anywhere to campaign in line, political parties were never handing out water or food.

Now you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. A person wearing a dozen pins for either Party comes-up and gives you food. It wasn't the Party, but it was very clear where that food came from, and what intent it had. I think we'd all agree that their are far too many lazy and/or dumb voters, who would let this influence how they vote. Maybe not for the "big" POTUS elections, but certainly for most others.

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/7/2021 6:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/7/2021 2:19:00 PM (view original):
Requiring ID to vote is NOT bad. (WTH doesn't have an ID these days - see earlier list.)
Restricting Parties from handing-out food or water to voters is NOT bad.
Adding an extra early day to vote is NOT bad.
Not mailing absentee ballots to all voters is NOT bad.
You're making a blanket statement about the Bill, when I bet if you broke it down, it has as many "good" things as it does "bad" to most people - except maybe extremists like you and others here..

Dude, it allows the state to intervene if they don’t like the result, is this a serious conversation right now?

I never came close to saying everything in the Bill was "good". I noted some things in it that I think are good and believe many others think are good. Almost any Bill is going to have good and bad points, in almost everyone's opinion.
Of course, good and bad only became an issue after you stopped trying to convince people (including maybe yourself), that the Bill was racist, which it is NOT.

The bill doesn't ban people with party pins from handing out water. It bans everyone from handing out water. All3 is once again lying about the bill.

Posted by tangplay on 4/8/2021 1:49:00 PM (view original):
The bill doesn't ban people with party pins from handing out water. It bans everyone from handing out water. All3 is once again lying about the bill.

He's lying about the RACIST bill. Which it is. allMOUTH again lives up to his name, ignores facts and believes outright LIES. He's TRASH.

"Funny" how MLB Commish Manfred thinks the GA voter Bill is so bad that he needed to move the ASG, but doesn't feel it's bad enough to give-up his membership to Augusta. Great example of hypocrisy there Mr. Manfred.

Posted by all3 on 4/8/2021 11:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/7/2021 6:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 4/7/2021 6:15:00 PM (view original):
Do you think MLB cares where the money comes from? No, they don't. Their decision was money based.
You're right...maybe the political parties should not give out food and water at polling places. I admit I haven't read the exact wording of the bill, just that it makes it illegal to give water to voters waiting online. If it specifies political parties giving out supplies I have no problem with that. If it just sayys it is illegal to give food or water to waiting voters, I do have an issue with that.

You’re not allowed anywhere to campaign in line, political parties were never handing out water or food.

Now you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. A person wearing a dozen pins for either Party comes-up and gives you food. It wasn't the Party, but it was very clear where that food came from, and what intent it had. I think we'd all agree that their are far too many lazy and/or dumb voters, who would let this influence how they vote. Maybe not for the "big" POTUS elections, but certainly for most others.

Yes, I’m the one arguing for the sake of arguing.

Political parties haven’t been allowed to hand stuff out in voting lines since like Tammany Hall.

Posted by all3 on 4/8/2021 11:18:00 AM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/7/2021 6:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/7/2021 2:19:00 PM (view original):
Requiring ID to vote is NOT bad. (WTH doesn't have an ID these days - see earlier list.)
Restricting Parties from handing-out food or water to voters is NOT bad.
Adding an extra early day to vote is NOT bad.
Not mailing absentee ballots to all voters is NOT bad.
You're making a blanket statement about the Bill, when I bet if you broke it down, it has as many "good" things as it does "bad" to most people - except maybe extremists like you and others here..

Dude, it allows the state to intervene if they don’t like the result, is this a serious conversation right now?

I never came close to saying everything in the Bill was "good". I noted some things in it that I think are good and believe many others think are good. Almost any Bill is going to have good and bad points, in almost everyone's opinion.
Of course, good and bad only became an issue after you stopped trying to convince people (including maybe yourself), that the Bill was racist, which it is NOT.

Jesus Christ

Well, as long as you think there’s some good in the bill it’s ok to give power to the legislature to overturn the voters if they don’t like the votes. That’s fine by you.

Yup, that's exactly what I said. And people say I'm the one who puts words in others' mouths.

Posted by all3 on 4/9/2021 5:58:00 PM (view original):
Yup, that's exactly what I said. And people say I'm the one who puts words in others' mouths.

************, yes, it’s what your words said.

My argument was that the Bill was not racist. You for some reason decided to switch that to the Bill being good or bad by stating some of the bad, so I stated some of the good. I never said the whole Bill was good. Maybe if you'd stop worrying so much about arguing everything I post, you'd have actually noted that.

You challenge people to debate you, but why would they waste their time (yes, I have too much free time) when name-calling, profanity, and twisting their words is what you resort to?

I've been reasonable and honest enough to openly admitted the Bill has bad things in it. Why can't you be reasonable and honest enough to admit it has good in it, instead of resorting to such things? I'll say no more about it.

Someone should have asked all3 whether he would have voted for the bill.

I suspect the answer is yes, and it would force him to give up the disingenuous "good things and bad things" bullshit.