Because your wrong way of thinking and speaking is far more serious then his opinion.

You don't think that him thinking this unconfirmed report qualifies as enough evidence to believe in the lab leak theory is a "wrong way of thinking"?

I do but you do it intentionally and he thinks as a Republican thinks.
people from the far left such as yourself do their fair share of falsifying information.

According to a top notch Washington post reporter there is a us intelligence report identifying 3 Wuhan lab researchers who went to the hospital.
before this is catagorized as circumstantial evidence one should want to know whether the names of the researchers was verified and whether it was verified that they went to the hospital at same time.

remember the Russian bounty imbroglio?

Barely….

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/covid-likely-lab-leak-gop-house-member-175438517.html

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/31/2021 9:17:00 PM (view original):
Barely….

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/covid-likely-lab-leak-gop-house-member-175438517.html

Read my post above - before you jump to conclusions.
Does anyone know the specifics in the report and if anything has been verified.

Don’t you think that congressman could be biased or maybe even not very thorough. We have seen that before.
most Republican house members in particular are not very smart or honest so I’m still waiting for more before I bite.

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/31/2021 9:17:00 PM (view original):
Barely….

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/covid-likely-lab-leak-gop-house-member-175438517.html

Once again, I don't think you read what you post.

This is one House GOP member saying he believes it leaked from a lab. There isn't any evidence here. It's just one guy's opinion.

Posted by tangplay on 5/31/2021 10:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/31/2021 9:17:00 PM (view original):
Barely….

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/covid-likely-lab-leak-gop-house-member-175438517.html

Once again, I don't think you read what you post.

This is one House GOP member saying he believes it leaked from a lab. There isn't any evidence here. It's just one guy's opinion.

No - you can’t read either - he said his opinion was based on an intelligence briefing and one could assume the intelligence report.
we do NOT know whether or not the briefing contained evidence or third hand unverified allegations.
it might or might not.

...which is why one guy giving his opinion is not evidence.

Maybe the report itself could contain evidence. But not this one guy's opinion.

Posted by tangplay on 6/1/2021 1:02:00 AM (view original):
...which is why one guy giving his opinion is not evidence.

Maybe the report itself could contain evidence. But not this one guy's opinion.

More twisting.
you said there is no evidence here. The report and briefing could contain discussion of evidence.

it is getting repetitious. How can you be a reporter if you can’t distinguish wording and definitions and terms correctly.

Yes. It could. The article simply about one guy giving his opinion, however, is not evidence.

You keep quoting my posts and restating what I said, but swapping out one word or two. We agree on this issue, and you would recognize that it you got your head out of your ***.

Posted by tangplay on 6/1/2021 12:09:00 PM (view original):
Yes. It could. The article simply about one guy giving his opinion, however, is not evidence.

You keep quoting my posts and restating what I said, but swapping out one word or two. We agree on this issue, and you would recognize that it you got your head out of your ***.

You do not know how to think or write clearly or communicate.
if the report had conclusive evidence then his statement would be more then mere opinion. It would be opinion based on evidence.

IF the report.............. IF a pig had wings.... it'd still be a pig. A flying pig maybe......... that oinks, and poops from high above.
Like a big, fat, ugly Pigeon.

Single Pigeon.

But we don't know whether the report has conclusive evidence... hence why I said to wait for the report. This one person's opinion is clearly not evidence on its own.

Stop being such a pedant.

Posted by tangplay on 6/1/2021 1:38:00 PM (view original):
But we don't know whether the report has conclusive evidence... hence why I said to wait for the report. This one person's opinion is clearly not evidence on its own.

Stop being such a pedant.

The first paragraph is correct.