Posted by Baums_away on 9/12/2021 10:58:00 AM (view original):
Has anyone built a team with 80+ PER at every position? It’s something I’ve always wanted to do but don’t think there are enough bigs out there that can shoot.
i'm curious what you'd be looking to get out of such a scheme?
i don't know if its been done, but i imagine it would not go very well. i tried pretty hard to advance a 4-guard lineup scheme under press and was unsuccessful. i'm sure someone could build a good program with it or whatever, that sort of thing, but it was always meaningfully worse than equally talented, more balanced lineups, for me. with crappier teams especially fb/fcp, i do find that small ball route to be more viable, like 4 guard or 3 guard sf, i have definitely gotten good mileage from that from low prestige d1 type of situations. but its not a good strategy for high end teams. anyway, i had thought the extra TOs generated at the 4 would pay for the reb, but if you have good TO generation from the 1-3 already, you just don't get much more. and then the extra per scoring, i found i was just spreading it around, but it wasn't really raising the quality.
also my opinion of per bigs is poor. i think using a bit of 3pt scoring in your bigs can help offset lack of 3pt scoring on the team in general, and sometimes that can be a valuable strategy really. but when you face 3pt defenses and quality teams, 3pt scoring bigs just aren't that efficient, and now they take all those pesky long 2s which are just really bad under HD. so combining them with quality per scoring guards just doesn't make sense IMO.