Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Topic

Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
11/19/2021 6:13 PM
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
And I'll answer.

The governor called in 500 national guard troops ahead of the verdict, fearing more destruction and mayhem following a certain verdict of not guilty. To pretend that doesn't factor in the equation is naive or willfully ignorant.

Your turn.
11/19/2021 6:32 PM
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 6:32:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
And I'll answer.

The governor called in 500 national guard troops ahead of the verdict, fearing more destruction and mayhem following a certain verdict of not guilty. To pretend that doesn't factor in the equation is naive or willfully ignorant.

Your turn.
Once you bring in naive and willfully ignorant I ignore the question and I turn away.
11/19/2021 6:38 PM
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 6:32:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
And I'll answer.

The governor called in 500 national guard troops ahead of the verdict, fearing more destruction and mayhem following a certain verdict of not guilty. To pretend that doesn't factor in the equation is naive or willfully ignorant.

Your turn.
Once you bring in naive and willfully ignorant I ignore the question and I turn away.
How surprising
11/19/2021 6:43 PM
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 6:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 6:32:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
And I'll answer.

The governor called in 500 national guard troops ahead of the verdict, fearing more destruction and mayhem following a certain verdict of not guilty. To pretend that doesn't factor in the equation is naive or willfully ignorant.

Your turn.
Once you bring in naive and willfully ignorant I ignore the question and I turn away.
How surprising
If you knew anything about me you would not be surprised at all because I have certain standards and principles that I insist upon when discussing politics.
No hyperbole from me and no big deal either.
11/19/2021 7:00 PM
You had a chance to answer before I fell short of your high standards, but chose to flip the question on me instead. I answered, in spite of your substandard deflection routine.
11/19/2021 7:13 PM
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 7:13:00 PM (view original):
You had a chance to answer before I fell short of your high standards, but chose to flip the question on me instead. I answered, in spite of your substandard deflection routine.
You did not grasp my point and that’s ok.
11/19/2021 7:17 PM
I'm glad I could provide an out for you.
11/19/2021 7:23 PM
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 6:32:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
And I'll answer.

The governor called in 500 national guard troops ahead of the verdict, fearing more destruction and mayhem following a certain verdict of not guilty. To pretend that doesn't factor in the equation is naive or willfully ignorant.

Your turn.
They could’ve been called up in case of a guilty verdict.

11/19/2021 7:29 PM
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 7:23:00 PM (view original):
I'm glad I could provide an out for you.
Wrong and I will say this for the last time. I never shy away from giving my point of view but only when I can enjoy having a respectful discussion and that’s my final word on this.

You can have the final word and say whatever you like.
11/19/2021 7:30 PM
Posted by Uofa2 on 11/19/2021 7:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 6:32:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
And I'll answer.

The governor called in 500 national guard troops ahead of the verdict, fearing more destruction and mayhem following a certain verdict of not guilty. To pretend that doesn't factor in the equation is naive or willfully ignorant.

Your turn.
They could’ve been called up in case of a guilty verdict.

Yep. I bet that was the reason.
11/19/2021 7:32 PM
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 7:32:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Uofa2 on 11/19/2021 7:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 6:32:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 6:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bruceleefan on 11/19/2021 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Jetson21 on 11/19/2021 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think they rendered the safe verdict instead of the right verdict,
Please elaborate. In what way was a not guilty verdict "safe"?
I could ask the same question of you?
And I'll answer.

The governor called in 500 national guard troops ahead of the verdict, fearing more destruction and mayhem following a certain verdict of not guilty. To pretend that doesn't factor in the equation is naive or willfully ignorant.

Your turn.
They could’ve been called up in case of a guilty verdict.

Yep. I bet that was the reason.

There were reports and pictures of Rittenhouse supporters with AKs outside the courthouse.
11/19/2021 7:49 PM
No Uofa, right wingers never riot due to political frustrations, especially around court cases. Never happened before.
11/19/2021 8:14 PM
Just want everyone to remember: OJ didn’t kill Nicole or Ron. He was found not guilty.
11/19/2021 11:09 PM
There were 45 incidences of "civil unrest" from 2010 thru today according to Wikipedia.
Maybe 5 of them were from people considered "right wingers".
11/19/2021 11:25 PM
◂ Prev 1...16|17|18|19|20...30 Next ▸
Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.