Once again the game decides that my #1 QB is leaving the program. He was a redshirt junior this past season and was ranked as the #2 QB in all of Hayes according to the GUESS rankings. He was poised to be the #1 ranked QB in all of Hayes and would have been my starter as a redshirt senior this season. But instead he has been removed from my roster.
THAT IS BULLSH!T
FECKIN' BULLSH!T

I've seen it happen most when a new coach takes over a team.

From your previous post, you knew this was a thing now. Like you, I'm not a fan of it but, I make sure my JRs start at least one half of one game. Especially the good ones. Some of my JRs I don't when they suck and hope they get cut!

Posted by realist9900 on 12/22/2025 11:37:00 AM (view original):
From your previous post, you knew this was a thing now. Like you, I'm not a fan of it but, I make sure my JRs start at least one half of one game. Especially the good ones. Some of my JRs I don't when they suck and hope they get cut!

(He just took over the team.) But you're right about ******* off the worthless players to get 'em to leave, that was a bigger part of the game way back when :)

realists rule

Posted by majique on 12/22/2025 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by realist9900 on 12/22/2025 11:37:00 AM (view original):
From your previous post, you knew this was a thing now. Like you, I'm not a fan of it but, I make sure my JRs start at least one half of one game. Especially the good ones. Some of my JRs I don't when they suck and hope they get cut!

(He just took over the team.) But you're right about ******* off the worthless players to get 'em to leave, that was a bigger part of the game way back when :)

I didn't see that in his post. Yea that is poor design. I thought new owners of teams didn't have to fulfill any kind of playing time promises from previous coach, which would assume also applied to JRs not getting playing time.

Posted by realist9900 on 12/22/2025 12:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by majique on 12/22/2025 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by realist9900 on 12/22/2025 11:37:00 AM (view original):
From your previous post, you knew this was a thing now. Like you, I'm not a fan of it but, I make sure my JRs start at least one half of one game. Especially the good ones. Some of my JRs I don't when they suck and hope they get cut!

(He just took over the team.) But you're right about ******* off the worthless players to get 'em to leave, that was a bigger part of the game way back when :)

I didn't see that in his post. Yea that is poor design. I thought new owners of teams didn't have to fulfill any kind of playing time promises from previous coach, which would assume also applied to JRs not getting playing time.

Since it certainly seems they are making small but significant tweaks to the game, I wish they would tell everyone what they have done.

Transparency.

Integrity.

Posted by realist9900 on 12/22/2025 12:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by majique on 12/22/2025 12:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by realist9900 on 12/22/2025 11:37:00 AM (view original):
From your previous post, you knew this was a thing now. Like you, I'm not a fan of it but, I make sure my JRs start at least one half of one game. Especially the good ones. Some of my JRs I don't when they suck and hope they get cut!

(He just took over the team.) But you're right about ******* off the worthless players to get 'em to leave, that was a bigger part of the game way back when :)

I didn't see that in his post. Yea that is poor design. I thought new owners of teams didn't have to fulfill any kind of playing time promises from previous coach, which would assume also applied to JRs not getting playing time.

It wasn't in his post. I knew he just got the job at Penn St in Hayes. Not sure it has anything to do with promises, probably just another unpublished aspect of the game.