Because you're not currently a member of this world, your access is limited to newspaper-type areas of the game.
Below is a snapshot of what makes HBD the #1 baseball simulation game on any device.
scoop015
03/04
I would vote no to this clause. I don’t have a problem with including more cash in a deal.
timb116
03/04
This is a rare time Gorshar and I disagree. I too consider it an asset which can be traded
gorshar
03/04
I have no problem with cash limits on trades. We all get 185m to start. Sort yourself out when we set budgets instead of begging someone to send you cash to sign a draft pick you failed to budget for...
gobosox514
03/04
I veto every trade anyway (kidding). Unless it is completely ridiculous (and like porn, you'll know it when you see it) I don't think it's a big deal if someone wants an extra million or...
jlinchec
03/04
I vote yes
mistro
03/04
I’ve never been a proponent on restricting cash. I consider it as much an asset as players, so restricting it beyond the power of the veto isn’t something I’d be in favor of.
SpC1165
03/04
I feel that cash for player deals are ok. Ie if I send $4m and a scrub for a useful player making $3m that should be ok. We’re both getting something from the deal.
drummer_66
03/04
I would like to put an unofficial rule into words so it can be enforced moving forward.
drummer_66
03/04
It has to do with the amount of money involved in trades. The rule would read: "For trades involving cash, the amount of money going from one franchise to another cannot exceed the amount remain...
drummer_66
03/04
on contracts of the players involved." This has not been an issue, but a loose end I want to tie up. I will leave this open for discussion, but will also record votes for those who definitively s...