mrtheedge
03/17
Man, you really need to let it go. You are not going to win this argument,
mrtheedge
03/17
in fact, your last post actually confirms that the veto was the right call last season, because Brennaman is projected to be better than any of the guys you would have sent him and it isn’t even clos...
mrtheedge
03/17
Scouting, always do, so they are as accurate as possible. If you really need me to do a rating by rating analysis on all guys to help you understand why the return on Olmos was pennies on the dollar,...
jway11
03/17
tmantom I personally think that trade violated one of your rules because it was incredibly unbalanced,
jway11
03/17
that’s why I vetoed it. We had a replacement owner come in who knew nothing of our league and right off the bat accepted this unbalanced trade and did not provide any defense on why he did it. Pretty...
tmantom3285
03/17
Sorry - have two #3s haha
tmantom3285
03/17
And to be clear - in my opinion - you should ONLY veto a trade
tmantom3285
03/17
if 1) There is some obvious/sketchy collusion 2) It breaks some other private world rule 3) If one of the owners involved asks for a veto (which is a judgement call) or 3) It is predatory or unbalance...
tmantom3285
03/17
defend it… should NEVER have anything to do with “impact” or how good teams in question are… by saying that you’re essentially acknowledging that both that you’re veto reason has nothing to do with th...
tmantom3285
03/17
Just to follow up on the nonsensical comments made both this and last year about what the “return” would be on Olmos. Many owners explained that the comp picks would produce great value. Well,