depending on where one is in the alphabet, the considering list issue plays in different ways - it is big advantage for schools at the back of the alphabet

Holy ****. A user at Xavier has no say as to whether or not he's listed.

Did you have no say when you repeatedly took several players on/off redshirts?

Posted by fd343ny on 7/10/2017 10:10:00 PM (view original):
depending on where one is in the alphabet, the considering list issue plays in different ways - it is big advantage for schools at the back of the alphabet

I wanted to state firsthand that I don't think it's cheating. Just trying to make a point.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2017 10:19:00 PM (view original):
Holy ****. A user at Xavier has no say as to whether or not he's listed.

Did you have no say when you repeatedly took several players on/off redshirts?

You seriously can't make this **** up. I'm going to own you on this thread.

Let's try to follow along here, mkay?

There are teams that are intentionally doing this. They are collecting APs and sitting outside the list of 10. It is a loophole and according to you called cheating.

I'm only going to respond to you in this thread, only reason being, I can't fight a battle with 10 other coaches or nor will I attempt to.

There's no battle. You cheated and now you're trying to deflect.

It's a sim game. You "win" credits. Nice job. You earned those credits!!!!

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2017 10:19:00 PM (view original):
Holy ****. A user at Xavier has no say as to whether or not he's listed.

Did you have no say when you repeatedly took several players on/off redshirts?

So did you have no say while repeatedly taking several players on/off redshirts?

Honestly, I feel sad for you.

Not only did you cheat, you defend it. There's something wrong with you in that it is so important to be good at this game that you'd spend 5 hours(your estimate) cheating in order to gain an advantage. It's sad.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2017 10:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2017 10:19:00 PM (view original):
Holy ****. A user at Xavier has no say as to whether or not he's listed.

Did you have no say when you repeatedly took several players on/off redshirts?

So did you have no say while repeatedly taking several players on/off redshirts?

I see what you did here. Don't redirect the topic. I had plenty of say and addressed the issue. It's been debated for the past 2 days. This is why people can't take you seriously.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2017 10:30:00 PM (view original):
Honestly, I feel sad for you.

Not only did you cheat, you defend it. There's something wrong with you in that it is so important to be good at this game that you'd spend 5 hours(your estimate) cheating in order to gain an advantage. It's sad.

Again, if you want to discus it, go do that in the other thread. If you aren't sure what this subject is about, put on your reading glasses or in fact get a new pair of glasses and reread the subject title.

This is why you're considered a blatant cheater by the vast majority of the users here.

Sad.

I rest my case. I'm done with you. You're a clown bro.

If someone else would like to have an intelligent conversation, please feel free to reply to the OP.

I'll preface my post saying I think the flaw of not allowing players to view all schools that a recruit is interested in should be fixed ASAP (either by allowing us to scroll or sort through other means other than alphabetically).

I think shoe would say that if you are vulnerable to someone who is not visible it is probably due to the fact that you aren't prioritizing the target (i.e. attempting to cheap out to funnel your AP/recruiting $$$$ elsewhere). Obviously there are risk/rewards to such a strategy but its true that some schools having a clear advantage over others through no fault other than picking a school with a low initial letter.

I have on occasion even publicly notified the user (ironically it was you at WF for Derek Flynn) when I was lurking on the consideration list even though I was not visible (I was letting you know primarily due to the fact you were considering cutting an actual player off your roster at the time for a recruit in CA which I was targeting to replace an EE at the start of RS2).

How would you want us as coaches to behave due to this? To avoid what you would call late "poaching" (while I assume if Alabama was doing it, that's OK since they are visible)? How about if you are visible for 1 or 2 sessions and then are pushed off (do they get a pass then?)

Posted by thewizard17 on 7/10/2017 10:36:00 PM (view original):
I rest my case. I'm done with you. You're a clown bro.

If someone else would like to have an intelligent conversation, please feel free to reply to the OP.

You aren't banned yet?