i actually disagree and think you could pull this off relatively confidently, but some gaming of the system is in order. i also can't remember if the 80% rule is only different for promises (for sure it is there) or also starts.
anyway, here's the rub. if you don't start a guy until you get a complaint *and then meet your promise the rest of the way*, i believe you are still guaranteed for him to stay. this was true in the olden days and i haven't really had much reason to think its different now, although there was a thread once that raised an eyebrow - but i could be wrong. there has long been logic to protect coaches who make a simple mistake from losing a guy to promises, and what i just described... is not pushing that logic to its limits. i think its still safe, i would say like, im 95% sure its 100% safe to do that, and i think you can push that rule a *lot* farther before you get to 0% odds of keeping a guy. as a little test i did two guys on a test team and skipped the first 12 and 14 games respectively, then started the rest of the way, and both stayed. it might have been 10 and 12. i meant to do like 7 and 12 but i forgot to pay attention.
so i would basically say - skip the first 7 games till the first complaint (not sure its always 7 anymore but close). this gives you a buffer on the rest of the guys - then rotate 4/5 of them each game from there on out. treat the complainer as sacred. if you get another complainer i would be kinda scared but i think he'd be the odd man out and it would be decently late into the season, and you could start rotating 3/4 for the rest, and you'd still get all 4 to 80%. and as kc says, you do have the CT to make amends.
5/24/2020 2:01 PM (edited)